Greenspan Embarrassment Tour
09.17.07 -- 9:51PMBy Josh Marshall
Yep, I was wondering the same thing. Alan Greenspan's claim that Saddam was going to gain control of the Strait of Hormuz breaks down about 30 seconds after you look at a map. Why is no one else pointing this out?
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/053397.phpIraq was going to take over the straghts of Hormuz!?
....................
So Iraq has no port or border on the Strait. Saddam had no naval capability of consequence after the first Gulf War. He had no air force. On the ground, he would have had to fight his way through a legion of enemies to approach the Strait from either side, and plainly would have been crushed. The U.S. Navy is invincible in those waters.
At least one can see why the Fed has no statutorily delegated role in military matters.
Dr. Greenspan's book-promoting trip through the mainstream media is turning him into the Britney Spears of economists cum regulators: do he or she have any idea how they are perceived by others?
Yet, between these strange lines, Dr. Greenspan may be admitting that he assured the White House that the Fed would bolster the economy and the markets in the event that an invasion of Iraq led to another oil shock. If so, he would have contributed quite a great deal to the Administratin's comfort level in deciding to invade. Indeed, it may be that he extended the duration of his preternaturally low interest rate policy precisely to fulfill such a promise to the Administration. I merely speculate. But under this interpretation, his claim to having worried about the Strait of Hormuz would be, then, either a smokescreen or a particularly spurious recollection.
http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/coffeehouse/2007/sep/17/dr_greenspans_mysterious_media_tour