Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Greenspan's Claim Breaks Down 30 Seconds After You Look At A Map (TPM)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 10:38 PM
Original message
Greenspan's Claim Breaks Down 30 Seconds After You Look At A Map (TPM)
Greenspan Embarrassment Tour
09.17.07 -- 9:51PMBy Josh Marshall

Yep, I was wondering the same thing. Alan Greenspan's claim that Saddam was going to gain control of the Strait of Hormuz breaks down about 30 seconds after you look at a map. Why is no one else pointing this out?

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/053397.php


Iraq was going to take over the straghts of Hormuz!?

....................

So Iraq has no port or border on the Strait. Saddam had no naval capability of consequence after the first Gulf War. He had no air force. On the ground, he would have had to fight his way through a legion of enemies to approach the Strait from either side, and plainly would have been crushed. The U.S. Navy is invincible in those waters.

At least one can see why the Fed has no statutorily delegated role in military matters.

Dr. Greenspan's book-promoting trip through the mainstream media is turning him into the Britney Spears of economists cum regulators: do he or she have any idea how they are perceived by others?

Yet, between these strange lines, Dr. Greenspan may be admitting that he assured the White House that the Fed would bolster the economy and the markets in the event that an invasion of Iraq led to another oil shock. If so, he would have contributed quite a great deal to the Administratin's comfort level in deciding to invade. Indeed, it may be that he extended the duration of his preternaturally low interest rate policy precisely to fulfill such a promise to the Administration. I merely speculate. But under this interpretation, his claim to having worried about the Strait of Hormuz would be, then, either a smokescreen or a particularly spurious recollection.

http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/coffeehouse/2007/sep/17/dr_greenspans_mysterious_media_tour


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MazeRat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. He said tonight in an interview that scenario was "HIS" fear and why he supported the war...
Edited on Mon Sep-17-07 10:45 PM by MazeRat7
Seemed pretty clear he was speaking of "personal belief". But I too did wonder how such an educated man could make such a mistake :shrug:

MZr7

on edit: He also said because of this belief, that was why he said in the book the war was about Oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Greenspan's limp self-justifications are surely disappointing
I wonder what Ayn Rand would think of such a craven display of ass-covering by the Maestro?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. He was channelling Ayn Rand, or just getting senile.
Edited on Mon Sep-17-07 10:51 PM by EVDebs
Ravi Batra's book Greenspan's Fraud

http://www.buzzflash.com/hartmann/05/07/har05007.html

shows us all what Greedspan's legacy will be: the destruction of the US democratic system in order to fawn to an elite few,

You can have great wealth or a democracy, but you cannot have both--Louis Brandeis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. Greenspan is getting old, he just got his N's and Q's mixed up
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kansasblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. he's try to Powel-ize his legacy. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ossman Donating Member (883 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
6. Wouldn't Iran have a little to say to Iraq about taking over Hormuz?
Thanks old rat jumping from sinking ship. Shut up an go away now.

We know, we know, You were SO against the Bush tax cuts. Oh look, shiny keys!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC