Is There Too Much Binary Thinking At DU?

It's allowed if it's something the other person agrees it...

Too much binary thinking--yes or no? :rofl:

I might agree. Just because Rush Limbaugh "hates Hillary" and "little democrats" doesn't mean they are good things. All they have to do is crank up their noise machine and elicit resistance to guide us in a direction of their choosing.

You only offer two choices...yes or no.

.

.

Kerry wickedly tasering the young mouthpiece for freedom and truth, then NO, NOT AT ALL!

eom

:rofl: :rofl:

:hi:

n/t

00100000 01100010 01100101 01101100 01101001 01100101 01110110 01100101 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01110111 01100101 01101110 01110100 00100000 01110100 01101000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100110 01100001 01110010 00101110

:dunce:

<CR><LF> was useful because the Teletype carriage's
motion back to the left margin was "buried" under
the time it took to execute the line-feed. That is,
the line-feed acted as a sort of purposeful "fill
character".

By comparison, <LF><CR> would have caused the
next character to be printed while the carriage
was still slewing back to the left margin. (Trust
me on this; I know! ;) )

Tesha

... back in the old days. Yes, I was also intimately familiar with TTY (ASR/KSR) devices and "glass TTYs." Besides being the chief software support person for HASP (from the MFT/MVT days, later called JES3), I worked on utilities and standalone systems for taking in spooling tapes from a variety of outside non-IBM systems. I clearly remember formatting protocols where <CR> was interpreted as a <CR><LF> (implicit LF) and protocols with <LF><CR> sequences in lieu of the more common <CR><LF> sequence. Hell, I even remember when the <CR><LF> sequence sometimes had embedded pad <FF> characters for 'timing'.

:shrug: You can take my word for it or not.

:cry:

:toast:

:cry:

long answer: yes with a but.
short answer: no with a maybe.

You've gotta include the occasional null value thinking, too.

are comfortable with 'em.

011000010110110001101100001000000111100101101111011101010111001000100000011000100110000101110011011001010010000001100001011100100110010100100000011000100110010101101100011011110110111001100111001000000111010001101111001000000111010101110011

Those who categorize everyone into two groups - and those who don't.

:rofl:

They're sexier...

OK then have one of those. :toast:

Let's not go there...

This is a PG 13 board...

?

Where?

"Watch this be a "yes or no" poll."

Then I saw your options, and :spray: :rofl: hilarity ensued.

Irony, much?

... those who know binary, and those who don't.

I don't think it's thinking, I think it's trolling and diverting.