Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here's the text to Ahmadinejads speech! The part I find interesting is about the contracts!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 07:01 PM
Original message
Here's the text to Ahmadinejads speech! The part I find interesting is about the contracts!
What contracts? I never heard about this before. if he's telling the truth I don't blame them for making their own fuel. I sounds like they're getting ripped off by everyone. Does anyone have a link to this contract issue?


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/24/AR2007092401042.html
AHMADINEJAD (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): They tell us you don't let them -- they won't let them inspect. Why not? Of course we do. How come is it, anyway, that you have that right and we can't have it? We want to have the right to peaceful nuclear energy. They tell us, don't make it yourself, we'll give it to you.


Well, in the past, I tell you, we had contracts with the U.S. government, with the British government, the French government, the German government, and the Canadian government on nuclear development for peaceful purposes. But unilaterally, each and every one of them canceled their contracts with us, as a result of which the Iranian people had to pay a heavy cost in billions of dollars.


Why do we need the fuel from you? You've not even given us spare aircraft parts that we need for civilian aircraft for 28 years under the name of embargo and sanctions because we're against, for example, human rights or freedom? Under that pretext, you are deny us that technology? We want to have the right to self-determination toward our future. We want to be independent. Don't interfere in us.


If you don't give us spare parts for civilian aircraft, what is the expectation that you'd give us fuel for nuclear development for peaceful purposes?


For 30 years, we've faced these problems for over $5 billion to the Germans and then to the Russians, but we haven't gotten anything. And the words have not been completed.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/24/AR2007092401042.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Didn't American advisors encourage the Shah to pursue nuclear power
and to conserve Iran's oil?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes they did. But these "contracts" sound more recent....
I don't even know what king of company would sell nuke fuel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. nuclear fuel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Some kindly posted these links yesterday
can't recall title of the post :

U.S. endorsed Iranian plans to build massive nuclear energy industry
http://www.teamliberty.net/id229.html

Past Arguments Don't Square With Current Iran Policy
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A3983-2005Mar26.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thankyou very much. this is good!
What the current Bush Administration is asserting, particularly through its news agency Fox News, or as I like to call it, the Fascist Opinion X-change, is that it needs to prevent Iran from achieving the exact same nuclear capabilities that President Ford and his key appointees, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Wolfowitz were encouraging Iran to accomplish 30 years ago. Iran, a party to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, is guaranteed the right to develop peaceful nuclear power programs – regardless of whether the United States approves or disapproves the politics or political leadership of that country; a point that Iran has repeated over and over again. For 30 years, Iran has proclaimed that it needs nuclear power since its oil and gas supplies are limited, just like the United States, and therefore has the legal right to produce and operate nuclear power plants. Thirty years ago, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld agreed. Today, Cheney and Rumsfeld appear to be crawling out of their skins with uncontrollable militarized lust for control of Iranian oil fields via a U.S. occupied, Iran. The NEO-CON war drumbeaters have already devised their plans for the liberation of the people again, this time Iranian people, and making things all better, just like they have done in Iraq. Scary stuff, but it is true. In preparation, the Bush Administration has primed the mainstream media so effectively that 8 out of 10 Americans believe Iran poises an immediate nuclear threat to the United States. The President’s recent and risky travel to regional nuclear powers, Pakistan and India, no doubt also served as a strategic warning to those countries to prepare for the certain public backlash to be expected once the U.S. or Israel begins to drop bombs on Iran.

But it still doesn't tell us about the contracts. I wonder what companies sell fuel rods!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. Nuclear energy is a racket, that's for sure. With all that sunshine, Iran should go solar.
Really, nuclear energy is dangerous, dirty and monopolized by global corporate predators, of the kind who eat little Muslim babies for dinner. (Sorry, Mr. Swift!) Why encourage, empower and further enrich these bastards?

Iran should be green.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC