Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Grassley: Bush Holding Kids' Health Hostage

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 08:30 AM
Original message
Grassley: Bush Holding Kids' Health Hostage
GOP Senator Says Bush Should Put Health Bill Before Policy Goal

By Jonathan Weisman and Christopher Lee
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, September 25, 2007; Page A04

A senior Senate Republican accused President Bush yesterday of holding a bipartisan expansion of the popular State Children's Health Insurance Program hostage to his broader policy goals of using tax deductions to help people afford private health insurance coverage.

With a five-year, $35 billion expansion of the children's health insurance program due for a final vote in the House today, Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) and White House aides agreed that Bush's opposition to the legislation stems not from its price tag but from far larger health policy issues. The White House wants to use the issue of uninsured children to resurrect the president's long-dormant proposals to change the federal tax code to help the uninsured, adults and children alike, Grassley said, calling that a laudable goal but unrealistic politically.

"The president has a goal that I share, that we need to take care of the uninsured through private health insurance," said Grassley, relating a sharp conversation he had with Bush on Thursday morning. "But you can't put that on this bill."

"It's bad policy," White House spokesman Tony Fratto said of the children's health bill. "Why should we go along with bad policy if we've got something better?"

A day before the House vote, lobbying on Capitol Hill was in high gear. A broad coalition -- including liberal health policy advocates and their usual foes, the health insurance lobby -- endorsed the SCHIP bill, urging House Republicans to get on board and the president to sign it. The bill appears to have at least 69 votes in the Senate, a bipartisan, veto-proof majority, so White House lobbying has focused on House Republicans.

Reps. Heather A. Wilson (N.M.) and Ray LaHood (Ill.) released a letter to fellow Republicans yesterday, urging them to vote for the bill.

more...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/24/AR2007092401562.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Never thought I'd agree with Chuck Grassley on something
:wow:

Hope he gathers enough Senators to override *'s upcoming veto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Or LaHood or Heather Wilson! It's nice to see some push-back, though
cooler heads must realize vetoing this is NOT a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Too bad this is only about their political reputations and not about
insuring children. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. The Democrats need to hold their feet to the fire on this. "Bush wants
sick children to pay for the wars and his deficit."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC