Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My LEAST favorite liberal buzzword--and what's yours?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 06:36 PM
Original message
My LEAST favorite liberal buzzword--and what's yours?
Which word, phrase, or expression makes you cringe when others on DU or other liberal forums use it, despite a similar political perspective?

Mine is Police State.

We get accused of hyperbole a lot from the right, although they themselves are the most skilled at it--especially when it comes to the politics of fear. (Axis of Evil, anyone?) Still, I cringe openly when my fellow liberals use the expression to describe Bush's America--it just proves to me that person has absolutely no perspective of the world at large. I want to say, Jesus, open your eyes--Myanmar is a police state. North Korea is a police state. And in some regions, Iraq is a police state. These are nations where an all-powerful, unchecked central government dispatches security forces to brutally silence opposition and covertly settle political scores. The very fact that someone would apply that expression to events where, say, a single uncooperative student is tasered by university security, or a disruptive protest group in the Capitol building is taken into custody by congressional police--it's not just inaccurate; it shows a complete lack of perspective on history and world politics. And to those who argue the point with me, I would say that the very fact that the student was allowed to pose questions to a sitting government official, or that the protest group was allowed into the Capitol building at all, is proof that our country is not the Third Reich--at least as far as jackbooted thugs coming to squash us is concerned.

Now, of course, there are plenty of things Bush has done to inch us in that direction--Gitmo, for one. Wiretapping, for another. Lately we have risked becoming a police state to the rest of the world, if not to our own citizens. I even remember scenes in Fahrenheit 9/11 where perfectly ordinary liberals, guilty of nothing but being outspoken, were spied upon by various government agencies, and I would say that this point in our country marks the closest we've ever come to outright fascism. But if I remember correctly, no one was spirited away in the middle of the night, never to be seen again. Furthermore, The crucial difference is that the uniformed cops that we see on our streets every day do not take orders from the Ruling Party, and they couldn't care less about the political ideology of Individuals. They care if we park in a yellow zone, or if we're being drunk and disorderly at 3 AM. Or, you could argue, if we're not white. But if I went up to a Brooklyn cop and announced "Down with George Bush! Vice President Cheney is the Devil!" he would probably say "Get the F$%# outta my face, pal--I'm watchin' for jaywalkers here!" He would NOT file a report with his superiors, branding me as a subversive, and I would NOT subsequently have my door kicked down by thugs late at night, come to ship me off to a "re-education center."

If you're watching the news to find out what's going on in Rangoon right now--THAT is a police state. Bush's America may be many awful things, but within our borders, we're not there yet--and hopefully, we never will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, let's now discuss what we really, really don't like about DU.
I vote for the mods locking threads too soon, except when they take forever, if at all!

:-) MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. ...
Mine are liberal buzzword :evilgrin:

Isn't trashing liberals a hobby of the DLC not DU? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Not *just* the DLC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
45. Thanks for highlighting my pet peeve "DLC". Too many here use the term in lieu of poopie-head
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. That was *two* words. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. I don't know...
I kinda like people railing and angry about that has been happening. The more people rail, the more others hear it and pay attention to things. That can't be bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. I agree with you, but you may catch hell
I don't think the UF kid should have had a taser used on him, but the way people were making him out to be a free speech martyr on this site was ridiculous! He is a whiny spoiled little brat and I'm disappointed in Greg Palast for rewarding his attention-seeking antics with a job. The last straw for me on DU was when a poster compared what happened to him to the treatment of women in Saudi Arabia by the religious police. I'm like, are you fucking kidding me?!?! :wow:

My least favorite buzzword, though not necessarily liberal, is "Political Correctness". Any comment you preface with "I know this isn't 'pc'...." gets to be as nasty and bigoted as you want it to be and you are granted immunity. It's a bullshit meme and I really hate it when fellow progressives evoke it.

Followed closely by "nanny state".

On DU "strawman" and "broad brush" are really overused and becoming annoying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. Maybe that's because there's
too much "strawman" used on DU and broadly brushing. We need to call it what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
43. I agree with two of yours: 'political correctness' and 'nanny state'
They have genuine meanings, but are too often both used to justify the right to ride roughshod over people.

I also get irritated by the *excessive* use of 'Big Pharma'. I realize that Big Pharma exists, and does some bad things, but it annoys me when *all* modern medicine (to which I owe my life!) is dismissed as nothing but a plot by 'Big Pharma'.

And the use of 'Nazi' for anyone who seems slightly too bossy or interfering. I don't mind so much people calling Bush et al 'Nazis' though I think it's over-the-top; but it really trivalizes the term when it starts being used in such phrases as 'health Nazi', 'smoking Nazi', 'spelling Nazi', 'feminazi', etc.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. baby killers
throw that one out and you might as well put on the love beads and smear patchouli on yourself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. Have you ever seen this used on DU? If so, please link.
Thanks. MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
37. That's a 'liberal' buzzword?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angrycarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. republican and it's various other forms
It is unfair to attribute the beliefs and deeds of the neo conservatives to republicans in general, as I have been recently informed. The rabid conservatives that have taken over the republican party have angered many lifelong republicans who are basically decent people. They are not angry enough to go over to the other side yet but maybe they will try to take back their party.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I thought Republicans had been the ones to rubber stamp everything Bush wanted.
And, support him.

So, um, :shrug: MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angrycarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. I'm not talking about the conservatives in washington
I was recently given a lesson in making broad general statements by a registered republican. Many of the local republicans are horrified by what has been done in the name of the GOP. My point is if many of these alienated people were not met with animosity by progressives the possibility exists to have converts rather than people who will vote rep. out of habit or spite. We are supposed to be the reasonable ones here and making blanket statements about large groups of people is a conservative habit that we should not adopt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Well, they weren't horrified at having total control of the Congress and President, until
pretty recently and now they want the Democratic Congress to rein in the guy they voted for twice.

They were about victory first, country second.

Even when it involved a war of frickin' choice. MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angrycarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. I never said republicans are rational
I suggested a more precise group of people to blame for this mess. Blaming the people who believed in the lies and voted for him is like calling them stupid to their face. You may be right but you will not make any friends that way. No one likes to be reminded daily that they were made a fool of. I am not one to hold grudges against groups as much as against individuals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. But, when they realize the extent to which they've been fooled, why on earth do you think
they'd look to the Democratic Party?

Aren't those of whom you speak much more likely to flock to a Gingrich or Paul?

Why on earth would they want to align with those whom they ridiculed at the height of "Mission Accomplished"?


MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angrycarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #26
38. Demonizing large groups
Is the first step towards discrimination. Save your anger for the group of ultra-rich, power-mad people who have manipulated the government and the media to play on the fears of America rather than the courage. Blame the men in the secret board rooms making plans to control everything. Simply blaming all republicans for the policies of the power elite is not the way to encourage a rational kind of social change. It's the same as people blaming all arabs for the actions of their radical terrorist element. It's too broad a term when talking about government wrong doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #38
42. The Republicans enabled this mess every step of the way. And, that happened from the average voter
to the mega wealthy.

You call it "demonizing". I call it reality.

The voting R's only now regret what their actions have wrought and are looking to the Dems for a fix, until their party is back in ascendency.

They have the conservative mind set, and there's nothing to change that. And, most are NOT looking for "rational social change", which would be inclusive of gays, minorities, the poor, etc.


MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #16
34. So, they won't join us because Dems are PO'd at the neocons?
Huh?

And it's the language progressives use that keeps the republicans from joining us in droves??? :silly:

Where were they for the last seven years??? Certainly not crying fowl loudly while their 'Duh leader' ran amuck!

Give me a break!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
32. Didn't I read this exact same post, verbatim, on another thread?
I think so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. I hate buzz words and phrases period.
They reflect an unwillingness or inability to think critically. I've come to detest the phrase "truth to power" which is now utterly meaningless and thrown about inappropriately with great abandon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's easy to become a "Police State".
Edited on Sun Sep-30-07 07:10 PM by liberalmuse
This is not a liberal buzzword or some piece of bullshit propaganda like the phrase, "War on Terror". A "Police State" is a reality that can happen in America if we sit back and do nothing, say, while the judiciary selects the President, and that President uses each and every day in office to chip away at The Constitution. If ONE student being tasered in America is no big deal, then you are the frog sitting in a pot on the stove.

Too many people in the world go through life barely conscious and apathetic. Thank god for people who are alert and ever aware of the early warning signs that our country may not be headed in the right place. America is not as bad as N. Korea or many other countries around the world-now, but you're throwing out strawmen. How about comparing America to America? When I hear old people who've lived through The Great Depression, WWII and the Red Scare saying they've never seen anything like what is happening now under Bush, I listen.

One day you are a democracy, and the next day you are vigorously waving a flag like it was a call to arms, in a country where a mediocre person gets an 80% approval rating, passionately hating a person whose name you can't even pronouce and supporting a pre-emptive strike against a nation who never did you any harm. Does that even sound vaguely familiar? If not, ask the Germans. I'm sure in the 1920's and for much of the 1930's they would have laughed off the idea of their becoming a police state and instead invited you to have a beer. After all, there were countries like Russia and Italy that were much worse off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fierce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. Progressive.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snarkturian Clone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
31. bah you beat me to it NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
40. gee why does that irritate you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. "brown people" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. Fascism.
Edited on Sun Sep-30-07 07:24 PM by 2rth2pwr
actual DU quotes-
"campaign based on hope? we're 9 stages into fascism. And there are only 10."

"There are many other books and essays before this one which say the exact same thing. Basiciaslly all the people who study fascism come to this same conclusion about what the ten steps are."

"The police are the shock troopers of our fascist corporate masters keeping everyone in line and quiet. Demonstrating, even in "permitted" actions against government policies is a risky way to exercise our supposed rights to assemble and protest with police intimidation and violence a real possibility."

"Despite the fascist shock troopers I would like the gun laws in the USA to be similar to those in other, more civilized, countries.

I wonder how many gun owners would be willing to resist the governments slide towards fascism by combatting and shooting their oppressors?"


Lots more, Just do a basic search.

edited to add box.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
15. I have several in the same theme as yours...'fascist', 'authoritarian', 'police state'...
Those all drive me nuts.

"Fascist" because people use it to mean just about everything accept fascism. "Authoritarian" because that gets used to cover any kind of expectation of civil behavior. And "police state" for the reasons you mention. Those terms smack of melodrama to me. The reality is bad enough. You don't have to exxagerate it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raejeanowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Thank you
Agreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. yeah. whatever you say. I'll take your word over the following any day. what does he know?
Edited on Sun Sep-30-07 08:27 PM by Gabi Hayes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. or this guy.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fading Captain Donating Member (895 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
21. meme
This word drives me nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Meme...a fantastic word to describe the latest catch phrase by the RW noise machine.
MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
24. It is something you can't head off too soon
Granted it's not a police state now. We all know that. Some use of language is rhetorical.

"Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty." -- Wendell Phillips, (1811-1884)

It's admirable that America is a place where the slightest suggestion of police state tactics brings howls of protest. Good. We won't just sit there and let it happen.

The freepers should be howling too, about these same sorts of things. Instead they seem ready to give it up for illusory safety.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
28. Fascism n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
29. Patriarchy. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SayWhatYo Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
30. I call everyone a fascist who disagrees with me...
Edited on Sun Sep-30-07 09:05 PM by SayWhatYo
of course I do it jokingly... So would say fascism is one of the words many people throw around without really knowing what it means... Although, communist and and terrorist are other ones I throw out. It of course depends on who I'm talking to. :P


Oh yeah, if you disagree with me then you're communist fascist terrorist.
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
33. Why do you dislike SPECIFALLY "liberal" things? How'bout disliking WINGNUT things?!1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
35. "Martial Law", often misspelled "Marshall Law" (Yes, even liberals occasionally misspell words.)
When the National Guard is called out in the event of riots or a disaster, someone inevitably screeches that martial law has been declared; this even if no declaration of the kind has been issued by governmental authorities.

Martial law means that judges in the civil courts have been replaced by military judges who hand down to civilians decisions that are based in military law. And it isn't necessarily a bad or harsh thing. Martial law was declared in the Hawaiian Islands during World War II. Regulations such as the curfew were strictly enforced. But the fines were sometimes unusual and often beneficial to the greater good. A person convicted of a traffic violation, for example, might be sentenced to donate a pint of blood for the war effort.

When National Guard troops are sent into the streets without a declaration of martial law, they are there at the request of the civil authority to enforce civil law. And that's the difference...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
36. 'But if I remember correctly, no one was spirited away in the middle of the night, never to be seen
Ever heard of Jose Padilla?

The War at Home

Will a 'Dirty Bomb' Kill Civil Rights?


BY ELIZABETH (BETITA) MARTEZ

http://www.war-times.org/issues/4art8.html

More than a thousand non-citizens living in the U.S. have been secretly detained since Sept. 11. Many remain imprisoned with no legal rights, even though they have not been charged with a crime. Now concern about the rights of U.S. citizens has leaped onto the agenda with reports of a so-called “dirty bomb.

snip-->

Federal agents arrested Jose Padilla, a Brooklyn-born Latino who had converted to Islam and taken the name Abdullah al-Muhajir, in Chicago last May 8. The day before he would have been released under laws protecting U.S. citizens from being held indefinitely, the FBI still could not put together a case against him. President Bush then approved his being reclassified as “an enemy combatant.”

Based on that classification, Padilla is now in military custody, incommunicado, at a South Carolina naval base. He has been denied all legal rights extended to U.S. citizens, such as the right to see a lawyer and due process.


Orange Alert for Civil Liberties

http://zmagsite.zmag.org/Apr2003/milchen0403.html

snip-->

Does abandoning this bedrock principle of freedom make us safer? Not likely. The Freedom of Information Act already allows the government to withhold such information if disclosure could hamper investigation of other suspects or events. Under the government veil of secrecy established last year, we have no legal right to know who among the 1,000-plus people secretly detained by the Bush administration since September 11 was charged with a terror-related crime.


http://www.laweekly.com/news/features/the-list/2637/">The List

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
39. "Alternative" anything
especially technology.

That and "sustainable." :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
41. Can't stand that play-on-words "Repuke"
Only because calling a Republican a "Repuke" is an insult to good, honest, all-natural puke.}(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
44. I agree.
Most people have little clue about the rest of the world and see it through some bizarre set of rose colored glasses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC