Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If a state tried to secede now, what do you think would happen?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:36 AM
Original message
If a state tried to secede now, what do you think would happen?

I don't think this WILL happen, but what if it did?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. It would not be permitted
I mean I don't know any other scenario - nobody would want to fail in the shadow of Lincoln.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. instant martial law for said state and inhabitants
can't have any of that nasty stuff happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. If one does, I hope it's Oklahoma or Texas -- until they agree to replace their
U.S. Senators. Cornyn. Hutchison. Coburn. Inhofe. Yuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. This is the thread that made me think about this:
Border Cities Block Access To Fence Land

Source: AP

Brownsville -- Mayors along the Texas-Mexico border have begun a quiet protest of the federal government's plans to build a fence along the border.

They have refused access to their land.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x3014454


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes. I see the connection.
What a disgrace for the U.S. to pressure Russia to bring the Berlin Wall down and then put that damn fence up along our southern border.

A disgrace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Good point, hadn't thought of that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zywiec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Wasn't one wall to keep people in, and the other to keep people out?
At least that's the way I remember it. I don't think Reagan said tear down this wall so all the poor West Germans could rush into the wonderfully beautiful East Germany for jobs and opportunity. I seem to remember everyone coming West to freedom and democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. I disagree. A wall is put up to divide people, period. It is the act of the
Haves to disenfranchise and isolate the have-nots.

Walls are divisions of the will of a people to identify and act as a collective, as a community, as family, as friends.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zywiec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. You're kidding, right?
The Berlin Wall was built by the Russians (Haves) to disenfranchise and isolate the have-nots (West Germany)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
41. Walls divide. That's their sole architectural function in politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Berlin Wall was both -kept westerners out and kept easterners in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zywiec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Westerners could get into the East with a travel visa
The Easterners could only get out when they were retired and of no use to the government. My wife's family had relatives on both sides of the wall. Believe me, the wall was not built to stop anyone coming in. It was to stop the brain drain going out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. I traveled from west to east-I was harassed upon entering, followed by police, and
was allowed in for the purpose of spending dollars in East Berlin. I was not permitted to travel outside of a small area of East Berlin. East Germany was prevented from fully closing the border access from west because the western powers fought their attempts.

This was a major issue of the Cold War.

The Iron Curtain was the wall of its day. We could not travel freely to Iron Curtain countries, trade was limited, and people could not get out to the west.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
42. Both a physical and ideological barrier, a divide, a wall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. Reagan was a grandstander. Free media and youth culture brought down E Germany.

Youth culture had been making enormous strides in changing Iran until recently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usaftmo Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
25. "Shrub, tear down that fence"
Future quote...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zywiec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. From Americans, or Mexicans? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
43. Wall
Remember, the purpose of the Berlin Wall was keep East Germans in East Germany. The fence on the Souther border is to keep people from entering the country illegally much more like Hadrian's wall in Britain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-05-07 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. Keeping that in mind, certainly, a wall's sole function is to divide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. Ask Texas and South Carolina.
I believe that it comes up regularly in their state legislatures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. I think it would depend on the state, but pretty much what everyone else said. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. A firm education
I think it's a good idea myself. I'd say break the thing up into a thousand pieces if you want. However, if any organized section remained, we'd just end up right back here again. That's the problem with growth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
10. Vermonters have been threatening to secede for years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. I especially like what this man said,
"The argument for secession is that the U.S. has become an empire that is essentially ungovernable -- it's too big, it's too corrupt and it no longer serves the needs of its citizens," said Rob Williams, editor of Vermont Commons, a quarterly newspaper dedicated to secession.
"Congress and the executive branch are being run by the multinationals. We have electoral fraud, rampant corporate corruption, a culture of militarism and war. If you care about democracy and self-governance and any kind of representative system, the only constitutional way to preserve what's left of the Republic is to peaceably take apart the empire."

http://www.boston.com/news/local/vermont/articles/2007/06/03/in_vermont_nascent_secession_movement_gains_traction/

Ah, if only! If Vermont did secede, then I guess they'd have to build their own fence to keep from being flooded with refugees from the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. Congress & Exec run by multinationals? Yes. reason Congress is non-responsive to people.
This is why watching the political show talking heads is counter-productive. the people we need to be watching are the media giant owners and ceos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. silly wabbits. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
13. One word, Blackwater!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mntleo2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
22. States should secede to Canada
...I have been touting this for almost a decade because it would be hard for U.S. to fight the move, IMO. It would be something that would immediately reap benefits for both Canada and the states that seceded ~ no more paying taxes for a needless war that would be good for Canadian coffers, universal healthcare for all, and while at this time the government is more conservative, it is "far left" to ours, our vote would actually be counted ~ by hand, our economy would not be damaged because we are already very tied in with theirs, education, especially higher education would be far less expensive, all the wing nut states that make us pay for their loony ideas such as faith based education/social programs/ wars or what ever they impose but do not pay (most of them pay far less revenue than "blue" states), the list goes on. We would enhance Canada with our resources and population. The only "downside" I can see is that we would have to also learn French, (Ooooo!).

My 2 cents

Cat In Seattle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #22
31. Michigan should go first
:toast:

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #22
34. You would have to learn to say "riding" rather than Congressional District, though. (NT)
Edited on Wed Oct-03-07 10:39 AM by Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #22
37. i like this idea-
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
milord Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #22
40. secession
What makes you think Canada would want us, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
23. The first thing that would happen is bush* will authorize Blackwater
(his personal army) to attack, kill and subdue all us Democrats! After they did away with Democrats...they would surround the capital and White House and protect their Dear Leader.

That bunch of Fundies scare the hell out of me should there ever be any sign of dissent in this country. God help us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
24. oh please let it be Texas!
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usaftmo Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. Don't forget Mississippi!
Edited on Wed Oct-03-07 09:46 AM by usaftmo
They named an airport down here after trent "helmut-head" lott, and he isn't even dead!
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #27
38. Being from the south....
I don't have the same impression of Mississippians as I do of Texans. Right wing Texans are the biggest assholes I've ever met in my life. Mississippians still have a little southern soul left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
26. Many places have threatened to Secede. Some areas have traditions going back decades.

Besides just the South, there have been mutterings about it from many places.

Vermont , Maine, The Upper Peninsula of Michigan, The Panhandle of Idaho have all had campaigns of varying levels of seriousness about Seceding from the USA and either forming their own nations or becoming part of Canada.


Has anyone heard of other states who had grassroots movements like this? I know West Virginia had something but it was more like a name change or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
29. If Idaho seceded, would anybody notice?
Edited on Wed Oct-03-07 09:50 AM by alfredo
We only think about Idaho when we eat a potato or one of their congressmen does something stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
30. It would probably be laughed at by the rest of the nation. And if the legislature actually
tried it, a citizen would sue and the Supreme Court would decide the issue (unless they determined it was non-justiciable).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OxQQme Donating Member (694 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. Two good fictional accounts
by Ernest Callenbach:
Ecotopia.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecotopia
and,
Ecotopia Emerging.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecotopia_Emerging
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobofSWVA Donating Member (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
33. we would force them back in
Either by military action or economic sanctions any state that seceded would be forced to rejoin.

We would also get to enjoy a big argument about the legality of secession. Do the states for them Union and retain the right to break away or does the supremacy of the national government mean it's a one way street and once you're in, you're in for good? We would get to see a rehash of some of the pro and anti secession debates that went on during the Civil War. Strict Constitutionalists vs. the spirit of the Declaration of Independence. Nation of Laws vs. Nation of Ideas. From a scholarly historical perspective it would be very interesting. Maybe we would finally amend the Constitution to explicitly outlaw secession from the Union.

I don’t really see a major divide between different regions in this country to justify secession anymore. We have blue areas in red states and red areas in blue states. You can find purple just about anywhere you look on election maps.

Maybe if something like this happened there would be a split.

Dr. Peter Venkman: This city is headed for a disaster of biblical proportions.
Mayor: What do you mean, "biblical"?
Dr Ray Stantz: What he means is Old Testament, Mr. Mayor, real wrath-of-God type stuff.
Dr. Peter Venkman: Exactly.
Dr Ray Stantz: Fire and brimstone coming down from the skies. Rivers and seas boiling.
Dr. Egon Spengler: Forty years of darkness. Earthquakes, volcanoes...
Winston Zeddemore: The dead rising from the grave.
Dr. Peter Venkman: Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together - mass hysteria.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
35. This article is timely
Secessionists meeting in Tennessee

By BILL POOVEY, Associated Press Writer
Wed Oct 3, 3:15 AM ET

CHATTANOOGA, Tenn. - In an unlikely marriage of desire to secede from the United States, two advocacy groups from opposite political traditions — New England and the South — are sitting down to talk.

Tired of foreign wars and what they consider right-wing courts, the Middlebury Institute wants liberal states like Vermont to be able to secede peacefully.

That sounds just fine to the League of the South, a conservative group that refuses to give up on Southern independence.

"We believe that an independent South, or Hawaii, Alaska, or Vermont would be better able to serve the interest of everybody, regardless of race or ethnicity," said Michael Hill of Killen, Ala., president of the League of the South.


Read the rest here: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071003/ap_on_re_us/secessionist_movement_1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
36. It would depend on which state
Sometimes, I think the federal government would like to give my state to Canada (Michigan).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
39. Probably depends as much on which state (and why) as anything, I'd imagine...
I know you're talking hypotheticals, but did you have one in mind? Montana seceding for (say) libertarian purposes would be different from California or Texas seceding to (say) keep that sweet, sweet tax income away from the federal government.

How they try would be a big deal, too; a referendum would probably be handled differently than a rebellion, of course!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
44. Fox would immediately report that the governor of that state was a leading al Qaeda member
Then we'd get to watch all kinds of cool robot bomb & cruise missle video footage. Boom!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-05-07 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
46. The Rs would start drooling over minerals and resources.
Edited on Fri Oct-05-07 12:15 AM by L. Coyote
The demise of the USA would free up vast territory. The West is 50% public land.

I often wonder if Bushco is trying to break up the USA for this reason.

Also, if CA leaves the Union, the Rs become politically as dominant as Rove hoped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC