|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
JMDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-03-07 07:31 PM Original message |
Hey Nancy -- What about those kids? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NanceGreggs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-03-07 07:49 PM Response to Original message |
1. Yuppers, everything is Nancy Pelosi's fault. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-03-07 07:51 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. He needs to be held accountable, Nance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NanceGreggs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-03-07 08:45 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. I have no problem with blaming the Dems ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-03-07 10:50 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. I believe impeachment would derail them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NanceGreggs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-03-07 11:47 PM Response to Reply #7 |
23. Or it might embolden them, and recapture their lost support. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-03-07 11:52 PM Response to Reply #7 |
24. Pelosi didn't block impeachment. She counted votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:19 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. She took it off the table before she even counted any votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:36 AM Response to Reply #25 |
27. she took it off the table (as did Howard Dean) during the campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 06:43 AM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Which pro-impeachment candidates lost? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 08:09 AM Response to Reply #30 |
31. here's a list of "pro impeachment" candidates -- no winners amongst them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 08:56 AM Response to Reply #31 |
32. None of them had winnable races -- impeachment or not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 09:41 PM Response to Reply #32 |
39. if impeachment is a winning strategy why wasn't it a winning issue? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-05-07 07:22 AM Response to Reply #39 |
41. We just saw that it was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-05-07 03:08 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. a lot of Democrats were elected narrowly. none promoted impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 02:56 AM Response to Reply #42 |
43. And a lot lost narrowly too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JMDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-03-07 07:54 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. I think I made it very clear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-03-07 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
4. Democrats begin push to override veto of kids health insurance bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JMDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-03-07 08:34 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. If the override occurs, I will cheer from the rooftops |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-03-07 11:02 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. If they don't have the votes to override the veto, how do they have the votes to oust Bush? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JMDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-03-07 11:07 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. You know, you are right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-03-07 11:45 PM Response to Reply #10 |
22. thank you for your lack of a thoughtful response |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-03-07 11:05 PM Response to Original message |
9. You aren't going to wait and see re the override? Just gona jump right out there? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JMDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-03-07 11:09 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. You are 100% right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-03-07 11:19 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Adios then amigo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JMDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-03-07 11:21 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. No, I'm gonna hang around and fight back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-03-07 11:23 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. No. I believe you are jumping the gun on the kids' insurance. And good luck with that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JMDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-03-07 11:25 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. And pray tell -- what has Bush NOT received that he's wanted in the last 11 months? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-03-07 11:42 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Pugs are crapping themselves. That I can already see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-03-07 11:11 PM Response to Original message |
12. I had gas tonight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JMDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-03-07 11:19 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. So you don't think impeachment proceedings are called for, I assume |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-03-07 11:24 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. You need to get a clue duddie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JMDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-03-07 11:26 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. I'd say you do too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-03-07 11:38 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. You haven't been around long enough to be calling posters out about unknowns. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:23 AM Response to Reply #20 |
26. What kind of tubes are you talking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:58 AM Response to Original message |
28. k&r. i think impeachment hearings would open a lot of shit up for the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 09:45 PM Response to Reply #28 |
40. you could be right. But how do you get to that point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 05:32 AM Response to Original message |
29. What a ridiculous leap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JMDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 09:08 AM Response to Reply #29 |
33. Except that they would know we mean business |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:04 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. repukes weren't a majority from 1994 on. Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zandor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
34. So Cheney Would Have Signed It? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 11:35 AM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Pay attention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zandor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 11:54 AM Response to Reply #35 |
36. And then Bush will be tried and hung? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 12:00 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. As if you really were interested |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC