Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Where Do They Stand? - Compare the candidates side-by-side and see where they stand on the issues

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:14 AM
Original message
Where Do They Stand? - Compare the candidates side-by-side and see where they stand on the issues


http://www.thebostonchannel.com/compare-candidates/index.html">Where Do They Stand?

Compare the candidates side-by-side and see where they stand on the issues

Are you unsure how the candidates for 2008 stand on the issues that are important to you?

Use our candidate comparison tool to see two presidential candidates side-by-side.

Just select two names from the drop-down menu and we'll show you their position on the issues.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cspanlovr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for the link. I'll look later when I've got more time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. Cool - Thanks!
Something interesting to play with along the way.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. Great site.
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. Interesting site
Bump......although can you really trust what they say?


Bush:

I'm worried about an opponent who uses nation building and the military in the same sentence.

Nov. 6, 2000 George W. Bush
Let me tell you what else I'm worried about: I'm worried about an opponent who uses nation building and the military in the same sentence. See, our view of the military is for our military to be properly prepared to fight and win war and, therefore, prevent war from happening in the first place. (more)

http://zfacts.com/p/136.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. This should be on the Greatest Page. Can we get some K & Rs for this
very useful reference?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Thanks for the recommend, tom_paine and to all the others too!
;)

I thought it might be a useful tool. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. I did a few comparisons and I think this site may need
Edited on Sat Oct-06-07 10:41 AM by Breeze54
to update it's information possibly. For instance...

Name: D - Chris Dodd & Name: D - Dennis Kucinich

It says that Dodd on Iraq:
Opposes troop increases, but has not supported a timetable for withdrawal
and opposes plans to cut funding. He originally voted in favor of the war.1

But Dodd does support a timetable, according to his website. See below.

It says that Kucinich on Iraq:
Opposed to war from the start, favors immediate withdrawal, and would cut funds
for proposed troop increases.1

http://www.thebostonchannel.com/politics/11251327/detail.html#1">Where They Stand - Sources

-----------------

The Dodd Plan To Restore America’s Moral Authority

http://chrisdodd.com/issues/foreign_affairs

* Strengthen our Alliances. As President, Chris Dodd will work to restore our alliances, rebuild international institutions to better fight the war against terrorism, and enhance America’s security while upholding our common values.

* Diplomacy, Not More Troops in Iraq. Chris Dodd is strongly opposed to the Bush-Cheney troop surge strategy. As President, he will advance a surge of diplomacy in the region, not a surge of more troops.

* End the War in Iraq Decisively. Chris Dodd understands that ending the war in Iraq makes America safer. He strongly supports the Feingold-Reid proposal – the only responsible measure in Congress that sets a timetable to end the war in Iraq by March 31, 2008 – and he has urged all the candidates in the presidential race to join him. It is time to stand up to the President’s misguided Iraq policy.

* Hold America’s Allies Accountable. As President, Chris Dodd would engage key strategic countries, nations like Saudi Arabia and Russia, and call on them to support freedom and democracy in their own countries and to eliminate the conditions that export terrorism and allow our enemies to thrive.

* Enhance and Export Energy Technology to Free America and the World From Reliance On Oil. Chris Dodd believes we need to invest in renewable energy technology that will allow America to achieve energy independence. As President, he would share that technology with our allies to end their alliances of necessity with dictators from oil-producing nations like Venezuela and Iran.



Perhaps Dodd changed his stand since then? :shrug:



Strength Through Peace - the Kucinich Plan

http://www.dennis4president.com/go/issues/strength-through-peace/

http://www.dennis4president.com/go/resources/kucinich-unveils-comprehensive-exit-plan-to-bring-troops-home,-stabilize-iraq/">Kucinich unveils comprehensive exit plan to bring troops home, stabilize Iraq

These are the elements of the Kucinich Plan:

1. The US announces it will end the occupation, close military bases and withdraw....
2. US announces that it will use existing funds to bring the troops and necessary equipment home...
3. Order a simultaneous return of all US contractors to the United States and turn over all
contracting work to the Iraqi government....
4. Convene a regional conference for the purpose of developing a security and stabilization
force for Iraq....
5. Prepare an international security and peacekeeping force to move in, replacing US troops
who then return home....
6. Develop and fund a process of national reconciliation....
7. Reconstruction and Jobs. Restart the failed reconstruction program in Iraq....'
8. Reparations. The US and Great Britain have a high moral obligation to enable a peace process
by beginning a program of significant reparations to the people of Iraq...
9. Political Sovereignty. Put an end to suspicions that the US invasion and occupation
was influenced by a desire to gain control of Iraq's oil assets by: A & B...
10. Iraq Economy. Set forth a plan to stabilize Iraq's cost for food and energy, on par to what
the prices were before the US invasion and occupation....
11.Economic Sovereignty. Work with the world community to restore Iraq's fiscal integrity...
12 .International Truth and Reconciliation....





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. It's incorrect, misleading, and shallow.
For example I looked up Richardson's positions at ontheissues.org earlier today, and to say that he "Opposes gun restrictions" as this site does, is not quite correct. Here is a quote from ontheissues.org:

http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/Bill_Richardson_Gun_Control.htm

A: The issue here, I believe, is instant background checks. Nobody who has a criminal background or is mentally ill should be able to get a weapon. That is the key, and that includes gun sales. That includes gun sales at gun shows. The key is going to be also attacking poverty, dealing with those kids in the ghettos that are heavy users of gun violence and that are victims of gun violence, to make sure that this country attacks the core problems of poverty.


So, I "compared" Richardson with Edwards. Here is what they say for Edwards: "Gun Control:
Supports background checks for gun show purchases."

Wait....you could say that about Richardson, according to the quote at ontheissues.org - but they don't!

That was the FIRST item I looked for. I don't see any reason to spend more time on it, except to warn people AWAY from that site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. I'm not sure that it's intentionally shallow, as much as it needs updating.
I'm going to e-mail them and ask them! ;)

They do provide sources that they base their 'answers' on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. I sent the webstaff an e-mail with your concerns.
Dear Web Staff;

I looked over your answers on Dodd and Richardson, and you have incorrect info on them and I'm going to assume on all the other candidates. The comprisons are in dire need of updating!! Please do it asap!!! Your reputation is in jeapardy!

Dodd IS in favor of a timetable for getting out of Iraq and and to say Richardson "Opposes gun restrictions" as this site does, is not quite correct. See: http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/Bill_Richardson_Gun_Control.htm

and also:
http://chrisdodd.com/issues/foreign_affairs
"Chris Dodd understands that ending the war in Iraq makes America safer. He strongly supports the Feingold-Reid proposal – the only responsible measure in Congress that sets a timetable to end the war in Iraq by March 31, 2008 "

Thank You!!!


OK??? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Thank you, excellent!
I guess I should do the same instead of just bitchin', huh. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. LOL! Go ahead and write them too!
I chose the web staff because I didn't see anything about the political forum listed in the drop down list. ;)

My guess was the weather dept. wouldn't really do anything about it! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lobster Martini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. Observation about Fred Thompson
(LM: Fred Thompson...oh heck, I'll just let the man not speak for himself...)

Homeland Security:
No info

Energy:
No info

Climate Change:
Questions whether global warming caused by manmade activity is real.

Health:
No info

Stem Cell Research:
No info

(LM: Fred Thompson. A man who spends a lot of time thinking...hmmm...might have the tuna salad today...maybe not...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. What a great leader he'd be ..
Edited on Sat Oct-06-07 10:46 AM by Breeze54
In front of a marching band at Disneyland!! :P

-------------

Name: R - Fred Thompson

Iraq:
Supports current Iraq strategy.115

Foreign Affairs:
Critical of the United Nations, saying it's not doing enough to help the world's problems.
Takes a stern view against Russia, accusing old-Soviet regime hardliners of running the
country through fear.114

Homeland Security:
No info

Immigration:
Supports increased border security and enforcement of current laws.
Opposes any path to citizenship for current illegals in the US.114

Economy:
Supports tax cuts made during the Bush Administration.
Says letting them expire would result in a historic tax hike.114

Education:
Says No Child Left Behind isn't working; states should be in charge of testing, not th
federal government. Wants federal money to go to the states with "fewer strings attached."117

Energy:

No info
Climate Change:
Questions whether global warming caused by manmade activity is real.
Cites research suggesting solar system is warming.116

Health:
No info

Social Security:
Supports some privatization.116

Stem Cell Research:
No info

Same Sex Marriage:
Believes states should decide whether to have civil unions.
Does not believe those unions be valid in states that oppose them.116

Abortion:
Anti-abortion114

Gun Control:
Opposes most gun restrictions114

---------------------

That's why he scored a 3 on my "Candidate Quiz"! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. And he didn't get the memo about the USSR being kaput!
But, if bassets and bloodhounds get the vote, he is a sure thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. thanks for that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
14. Ron Paul really is a nut
He may be OK on Iraq but on almost any other issue he would be a disaster. Even several of the other Republican candidates are more reasonable than he is on most issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. He's just like the other rethugs in many ways, as he
Edited on Sat Oct-06-07 12:06 PM by Breeze54
Favors very limited government.

He doesn't want paved roads or clean water, etc. apparently. :crazy:

:silly:

His anti-war stance on Iraq, I think, is a ploy to get attention and he's a repub to boot.

I'm not interested, that's for sure. ;)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. He is a consistent right libertarian.
Unlike his right-authoritarian fellow republican, who pay lip service to this ideology while implementing a fascist theocracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
19. Where's public campaign financing? THE most important issue that needs to be solved...
Edited on Sat Oct-06-07 12:16 PM by calipendence
... before we can get much else done to tear down the corporatocracy. Of course those doing this comparison chart thing know that, and don't want to have us look at that comparison.

Or for that matter breaking up the media consolidation or NAFTA/GATT treaties...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Good question!
You'd think some may want it 'hushed up'! ;)

Is that a main stream 'issue'? It should be and I did a google news search about it and I
got Results 1 - 10 of about 1,556 for reform campaign financing. (0.38 seconds) hits!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
22. Who owns and controls this site
Edited on Sun Oct-07-07 09:39 AM by Robson
and what's their ideology and agenda? That's what is always most important yet rarely gets addressed. As someone pointed out it is most important that the issues not be skewed or out of date. The media controls us by omission more than by blatant lies.

edited for spelling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC