|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 03:01 PM Original message |
So is Nader going to try to help the GOP again this time? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mayberry Machiavelli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
1. If the election was close enough for a Nader to make a difference, whether Clinton is the nominee or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 03:04 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. No it would just mean that some voters are selfish bastards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 03:10 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Third party voters didn't steal 2000, BushCo did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 03:14 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. If the Nader voters would have held their nose and voted Gore, we would have won |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 03:17 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. No, they were going to steal it anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 03:23 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Yes they stole 2000 and 2004 and tried to steal 2006 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 03:28 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. I've been devoting much too much time to this issue since |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:58 PM Response to Reply #16 |
41. They did steal 2006. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-07-07 11:05 AM Response to Reply #41 |
50. Not to mention, due to vote shaving all over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 03:28 PM Response to Reply #5 |
19. 97,000 Florida voters voted for Nader and Bush stole the election by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 08:09 PM Response to Reply #19 |
32. Bush didn't steal the election by less than 600 votes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 11:17 PM Response to Reply #32 |
42. The final vote count, after stealing, was within 600 votes. So if just a tiny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 11:21 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. I understand the resentment against Nader, I really do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-07-07 01:37 AM Response to Reply #43 |
44. He meant to, but he wouldn't have succeeded, any more than Rove |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-07-07 10:15 AM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Ohio had RIOTS on election night 2004. It didn't make any |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
3. Not nearly as much as the "moderate" dems who voted for Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 08:36 PM Response to Reply #3 |
34. It falls on deaf ears. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-07-07 02:31 AM Response to Reply #34 |
45. They should just kidnap him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-07-07 11:03 AM Response to Reply #45 |
47. Well said. It reminds me of all manner of scapegoating ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-07-07 02:20 PM Response to Reply #47 |
56. And how... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
4. Try again later. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daninthemoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
6. I sure hope not, but it is still way too early to know. I'm pretty sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 03:15 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Yes I'm hoping that happens, and the CC candidate sucks off a nice 2-10% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
7. No but... Cynthia McKinney to Announce Presidential Campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monktonman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 03:14 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Cynthia who???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 03:21 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Cynthia Impeach Bush and Your 9/11 Commission Report was a joke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monktonman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 03:41 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. Like I said....Cynthia who? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-07-07 01:35 PM Response to Reply #7 |
54. Woohoo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
8. not this time, unless of course he runs as a republican /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
13. Btw, I heard a rumor today that McKinney may run as a Green. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 04:08 PM Response to Reply #13 |
23. according to this site |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 08:04 PM Response to Reply #23 |
31. Thanks, MonkeyFunk. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-07-07 11:04 AM Response to Reply #23 |
48. I just got an email from the CA Greens that says she's going to declare. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
15. If it ends up Hillary vs the GOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 03:24 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. That's what they said about Nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 03:34 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. and there was actually some truth to that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nosmokes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 04:14 PM Response to Reply #15 |
24. Hillary v GOPosse, not enough difference to see daylight b'twn 'em |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
22. No, but the Naderites will. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
25. Because The "We Suck Slightly Less" Democrats Have been Working So Well For Us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeHereNow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 04:47 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. AMEN. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 08:37 PM Response to Reply #25 |
35. Word! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-07-07 12:26 PM Response to Reply #25 |
51. If you can't see the difference between the most conservative Dem and the GOP, you need glasses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-07-07 03:21 PM Response to Reply #51 |
58. She Doesn't Support Several Of My Pet Projects |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-07-07 03:23 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. petty bastard. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-07-07 01:38 PM Response to Reply #25 |
55. The Dems -- "We suck less than the other guys" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ozone_man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
26. Offer another choice then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Puregonzo1188 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
28. Because it's been too long since we've had a hysterical anti-Nader thread at DU. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:46 PM Response to Reply #28 |
38. And, if we don't keep Nader-hate going, we might see that Gore won Florida --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 06:00 PM Response to Original message |
29. Nader would do much worse this time around |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
30. minus 1 recommend. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
U4ikLefty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
33. Hey, if Hillary loses...we (Dems) gotta blame someone...correct?!? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
36. NO. But the ultra right will fund some Green, no doubt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
37. Gore and Kerry helped the GOP; Nader helped bring in Demcoratic voters --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
39. The Dems are doing a fine job of helping the GOP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laureloak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-06-07 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
40. He wont be needed unless Hillary is the nominee. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beelzebud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-07-07 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
49. Leader Reid and Speaker Pelosi are doing far more to help them than he ever did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larry Ogg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-07-07 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
52. I try to focus my blame on the real culprits, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-07-07 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
53. Ah, the inevitable, irrelevant "I hate Nader" post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-07-07 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
57. slow weekend? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 06th 2024, 08:04 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC