Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jimmy Carter announced his presidential candidacy on December 12, 1974.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 12:38 PM
Original message
Jimmy Carter announced his presidential candidacy on December 12, 1974.
Edited on Thu Oct-11-07 01:00 PM by BuyingThyme
He had to announce early because nobody knew who the hell he was. As I recall, he eventually won the thing.

Bill Clinton announced his presidential candidacy on October 3, 1991. He too had to announce a bit early because very few people had ever heard of Arkansas.

Al Gore announced his presidential candidacy on June 16, 1999. He won the race, but because he entered so damn early, he was penalized two million votes.

John Kerry announced his presidential candidacy on September 2, 2003, not as early as Gore, but the early-announcement penalty was just enough to cost him the office.

Al Gore, a seasoned veteran, will announce his {latest} presidential candidacy between October 15 and October 31, 2007. The timing is perfect. He's sure to win by an uncontested landslide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Uncontested landslide?
Based on what, exactly? I'm pretty certain that there are at least three candidates who will most definitely "contest" Gore's coronation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Oh, I'm not wasting any time on the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Good luck with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. He will? Where did you get your information?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The same place he got "uncontested landslide"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Correct.
The numbers don't lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. The same place she gets all her information
snatched out of the ether.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Oh, oh. Cali's here to lose another battle of wits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I'll leave that to others to decide.
But don't let that stop you from making silly claims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Like I didn't quote Johnathan Turley on impeachment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. I'm glad you brought that up.
What the constitution says:

Section 4.


The President, Vice President and all Civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.



What you say in that OP:

CONSTITUTION: Congress shall impeach for treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.
PELOSI: “Impeachment is off the table.”

CONSTITUTION: The Senate shall have the sole power to try all impeachments.
PELOSI: “I have the sole power.”

CONSTITUTION: Judgment in the cases of impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from office, but the party convicted shall be liable and subject to indictment, trial, judgment, and punishment, according to law.
PELOSI: “Moot point.”

CONSTITUTION: The senators and representatives shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution.
PELOSI: “Well, that depends on what the meaning of shall is.”


I know you're incapable of grasping this but the Constitution does NOT say that shall impeach. It says shall remove upon impeachment and conviction.

And stop with the Turley agrees with your made up constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. All we have to do now is figure out who does the impeaching.
Then we can do the removing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. All you have to do is stop making
up your own private constitution, and pretending its the real thing.

See ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. All I want to know is who does the impeaching.
I figure if we get in good with the impeachers it will be easier to get to the removers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I've been working on this for a long time.
I can back up the numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. do it then.
you're always making claims you can't back up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. With which numbers are you having problems?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. The numbers that indicate that Gore would win
in a landslide, or anything in the real world that provides evidence for that. Clue: DU opinion polls don't count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Oh, that's simple. Al Gore is a way better candidate than any Republican.
People will vote for him way more. Lots even.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. nope. not numbers. not evidence.
just pulled out of your......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Way more or lots?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. 2ed? It would be his third campaign for the presidency
Edited on Thu Oct-11-07 12:51 PM by RGBolen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. This thesis is based solely on winning Democratic campaigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. Don't forget Wesley Clark!
He was the last Democrat ti enter the primary race last time. How well did that work out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Wesley Clark has never won a presidential race.
We only deal with winners here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
21. The primaries weren't as compressed as they are now
With all of the states moving their primaries up, it would definitely make it more difficult to announce this late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. When was the arguable deadline?
When Thompson got in?

How's that primary legal battle going, anyways?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. Not trying to argue with you
I want Gore to get in, and I wouldn't even have to think about it to vote for him. And I hate that all the 2008 election crap started less than a week after the 2006 election. I was just pointing out that the primaries for most of the states have been moved up to an earlier date, and it would make it more difficult to enter late and win.

As far as Thompson goes, I think that the repukes hate their candidates soooo much, that they are looking for a savior, so they were promoting Fred Thompson even before he decided to run. Now that he has joined the race, and opened up his mouth and spoke, I don't think that he has as much support. It will be interesting. Run Al, Run!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. I know.
It's just fun posting ridiculous threads like this. It gives me hope.

But I really don't know how that primary challenge is panning out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zandor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
31. He has no intention!
Which means he might!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. I have no intention of dying of cancer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC