Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who is Mike Gravel?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 10:28 PM
Original message
Who is Mike Gravel?
http://www.gravel2008.us/?q=node/332

http://www.gravel2008.us/bio

AMERICA’S LOST VISION

By Senator Mike Gravel

February 3, 2007

Winter Meeting, Democratic National Committee

Governor Dean. As a lifelong Democrat––proud when my party did great things and occasionally ashamed when it did the wrong things––I honor and commend your leadership in rebuilding the party in every corner of this nation. Even more, you have my respect for your earlier and outspoken opposition to the Iraq war in your own presidential candidacy.

I plan to speak truth to power today. You, the delegates, have the power to decide who will be the Democratic nominee. I also plan to speak truth to the American people, who have the power to choose the next President of the United State.

But first, I have one small favor to ask of all of you. Whenever anyone raises the question of my age in this campaign, please point out that Washington is in great need of adult supervision.

Permit me to introduce my wife Whitney, the love of my life, and my sister Marie. Between them with the iconic hat, is Granny “D,” Doris Haddock, my strongest supporter in New Hampshire. Other candidates may have large campaign bank accounts; I’ll take Granny “D” on my side.

Fairness. Freedom. Justice. Morality. Opportunity. Peace. All goals of our Founding Fathers and concepts central to the character of most Americans.

Our Founders envisioned the People and their political leaders working together to nurture these goals and to shape these concepts from generation to generation. Unfortunately, early on, in a compromise to perpetuate the evil institution of slavery in the Constitution, the People lost their power to amend the Constitution and make laws. The compromisers knew the People would not ratify a Constitution that legalized slavery and would outlaw it if they had lawmaking powers. The results of this moral compromise brought about the primacy of representative government and its monopoly on lawmaking power.

History teaches us that nations fail when leaders fail their people. The decision to invade Iraq without provocation and fraudulently sold to the American people, by a President consumed with messianic purpose, sadly confirms this lesson of history.

The Democrats controlled the Senate on October 11, 2002 and provided political cover for George Bush to invade Iraq. The Senate leadership could have refused to even take up the resolution, or a few Senators who opposed it could have mounted a filibuster.

But the fear of opposing a popular warrior President on the eve of a mid-term election prevailed. Political calculations trumped morality, and the Middle East was set ablaze. The Democrats lost in the election anyway, but the American people lost even more. It was Politics as Usual.

Given the extreme importance of any decision to go to war, and I am anguished to say this,
it’s my opinion that anyone who voted for the war on October 11––
based on what President Bush represented––is not qualified to hold the office of President.


Political leaders must bring two qualities to any public office: political integrity and moral judgment.

If political calculations trump morality and occasion substantial loss of human life, it reveals the sense of moral responsibility these candidates are likely to bring to the office of President.

Saying “I would not have voted for the resolution if I had known the mess it would create”––or worse, saying “the decision was right but Bush botched the job”––is inadequate rationale for a person who may hold the most powerful political position in the world. Presidents have moral responsibility for the life and death of millions of people.

Politics as Usual is not acceptable for the presidency.

I feel I am entitled to raise this issue because when I served in the Senate, during the Vietnam War, I spoke truth to power.

I officially released the Pentagon Papers, and as a result, Richard Nixon sued me all the way to the Supreme Court.

I successfully filibustered to force an end to the military draft.

I filibustered alone and with others to end the appropriations for the Vietnam War. Those are my credentials.
I’ve been there and know how hard it is to oppose the majority of your peers.

I ask that you hold other presidential candidates to the same standard.
Political leaders who had the opportunity and the power to stop the Iraq war before
it could get started and did nothing–– allowed it to happen...

more at link....



http://www.gravel2008.us/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. (D) senator from Alaska in the 1970's nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Right on...
you win! :)

He's a breath of fresh air, imho!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Pentagon Papers. He was my senator for three years when I lived in Alaska
as a kid. He introduced parts of the Pentagon Papers into the Congressional Record.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Yes and stopped the draft!
Edited on Tue Feb-13-07 11:09 PM by Breeze54
In 1971, he waged a successful one-man filibuster for five months that forced the Nixon administration to cut a deal, effectively ending the draft in the United States. He is most prominently known for his release of the Pentagon Papers, the secret official study that revealed the lies and manipulations of successive U.S. administrations that misled the country into the Vietnam War. After the New York Times published portions of the leaked study, the Nixon administration moved to block any further publication of information and to punish any newspaper publisher who revealed the contents.

From the floor of the senate, Gravel (a junior senator at the time) insisted that his constituents had a right to know the truth behind the war and proceeded to read 4,100 pages of the 7,000 page document into the senate record. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled that Senator Gravel did not have the right and responsibility to share official documents with his constituents.

He then published The Senator Gravel Edition, The Pentagon Papers, Beacon Press (1971). This publication resulted in litigation, Gravel v. U.S., resulting in a landmark Supreme Court decision (No. 71-1017-1026) relative to the Speech and Debate Clause (Article 1, Section 6) of the United States Constitution.

He has worked as a cab driver in New York City, a clerk on Wall Street and as a brakeman on the Alaska Railroad. He founded and served as president of The Democracy Foundation, Philadelphia II, and Direct Democracy, nonprofit corporations dedicated to the establishment of direct democracy in the United States through the enactment of the National Initiative for Democracy by American voters.


http://www.gravel2008.us/bio
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montanacowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. I saw that speech he gave on CSpan
why are not any of our current 08 hopefuls talking like this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Good question!
Edited on Tue Feb-13-07 10:50 PM by Breeze54
Many of them voted for war on Iraq! They voted FOR the IWR!

None of them have earned my support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DonkeyInChinaShop Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Pretty impressive wikipedia entry too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cabcere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Welcome to DU, DonkeyInChinaShop!
:hi: Great username. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuskiesHowls Donating Member (582 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks for posting this!!!
As you said, he IS a breath of fresh air, and the first candidate that really makes sense, to me!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I feel the same way and
I like his sense of humor too! ;) "Washington needs adult supervision" :rofl:

Mike Gravel is an old fighter...a good guy! We need a whole lot more like him!! :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. Heard him speak at the DNC
winter meeting. He was wonderful, said what needed to be said. Amazing isn't it that he is totally ignored, even more the Dennis and he was a Senator too. He's quite old but he knew what he was talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I wish I had heard him speak.
There is a video available on his website.

Video of Mike Gravel at the DNC Winter Conference
February 7, 2007

Video of Mike Gravel from the C-Span.org website from the DNC Winter Conference.

http://www.gravel2008.us/?q=node/365

I'll download it and see him in action! ;)

He does speak the truth!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. He's only in his 70's
Edited on Tue Feb-13-07 11:05 PM by Breeze54
isn't he?

We have senators older than that!! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. Right on Iraq, he's wrong on Social Security and wrong on taxes.
Investment bankers must adore him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I'm not sure about
a national sales tax.... but he also calls on Congress
to stop raiding the Social Security Trust Fund.
That's a good thing! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. It's bullshit rhetoric used by people who want Junior's "plan" of pay-go and stocks.
Edited on Tue Feb-13-07 11:48 PM by TahitiNut
Let's keep our heads straight and realize that nobody is "raiding" the Social Security Trust Funds. Yet. That's what Our Leader wants to do. The Social Security Trust Funds are invested in T-Bills - the federal debt. The problem isn't that we have a debt the size of the Social Security Trust Funds, the problem is that we have a debt that's 2-3 times that size and growing.

What these people who are DROOLING over those trillions want to do is shovel that money into the stock market, and inflate the (greater fool) market price of stocks that just cause workers to get beat with longer whips. (Gotta chase that P/E ratio, you see.)

On top of that, they want to INCREASE the amount people pay into Social Security even to have any assurance the GET social Security. They do that by setting it up to pick "winners" and "losers" ... and letting the "winners" who don't live long enough to use up their Social Security pass it on to their heirs. Well, that'll give Sonny the gambler and drug addict a lot of incentive to let Dad go wandering across busy highways and collect his Social Security - or just not be real good at picking nursing homes.

All in all, Gravel's ideas about Social Security suck the BIG ONE. Ayn Rand would love it, though.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. Well worth a read. Recommended #1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Thank You Benhurst!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-14-07 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
19. Had to kick after * press conference!
:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC