Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is America's Aging Infrastructure a Disaster Waiting to Happen?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 11:00 AM
Original message
Is America's Aging Infrastructure a Disaster Waiting to Happen?
from the Westside Gazette, via MassTransitMag:



Is America's Aging Infrastructure a Disaster Waiting to Happen?


Chandler, Westside Gazette


"When you throw the switch & the power doesn't come on; when you turn your faucet & clean water doesn't come out, then you pay attention tO it. That's too late." - Patrick Natale, American Society of Civil Engineers(ASCE)

The Aug. 1st collapse of the eight-lane, 1-35 bridge over the Mississippi River in Minnesota, in which 5 were killed, 80 injured and unknown numbers missing, has cast an acute spotlight on America's aging infrastructure from bridges, roadways and dams, to the rail system, electrical grid, and this country's outmoded water treatment facilities.

It might be noted that the 1-35 bridge failure comes on the heels of a rupture in a century-old steam pipe in Manhattan that left one dead and massive property damage; the catastrophic breakdown of the levee system in New Orleans, resulting in over 1,500 casualties, and the 2003 Silver Lake Dam failure in Marquette, Michigan that led to the evacuation of over 1700 residents. Ominously, the threat to the country's infrastructure comes at a time when the funding for the War on Iraq could surpass $1 trillion, and currently is costing $200 million per day, per MSNBC News.

According to the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), in the three years between 2000 and 2003, roughly 27 percent of the country's 590,750 bridges were rated "struc-turally deficient or functionally obsolete," representing one out of every three bridges in urban centers, and one of every four bridges located in rural areas.

"There was huge boom in bridge building after Eisenhower created the Interstate system, the boom lasting from the late '5Os to the early '7Os," says Edwin Rossow, a civil and environ-mental engineering profes-sor at Northwestern Univer-sity in Chicago. "Being 'structurally deficient' doesn't mean the bridge is no good. It means... that because of changes in the allowable loads a vehicle can carry, and the fact that cars are bigger these days these can all strain an older structure. But all bridges deteriorate over time."

The cost to bring all of these bridges up to satisfactory safety standards will be around $200 billion and will take years to accomplish, civil engineers estimate.

Similarly, the number of dams, under state, local and private control considered to be in a hazardous, unsafe condition has increased by 33 percent to over 3,500 nationwide since 1998, including the massive Wolf Creek Dam in Tennessee the largest dam this side of the Mississippi River. The situation is further compounded by a lack of inspectors to monitor these dams in many instances. Roughly $10.1 billion will be needed to repair all the highhazard dams. Failure to do so could be catastrophic, the ASCE warns.

The U.S. electrical grid is also perilously close to disaster. This is due in Large part to the fact that existing electrical transmission facilities have not been able to keep up with the enormous demand for electricity. Exacerbating the problem, the construction of new power plants has far outpaced efforts to mode-rnize existing power trans-mission facilities or build new ones. In addition, there has been a marked decrease in the amount of funding allocated for maintenance and upkeep of these facilities, resulting in increased consumer costs and greater risks of future blackouts, as 'bottlenecks' clog the system, particularly during the peak summer periods when airconditioning use spikes. ......(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.masstransitmag.com/online/article.jsp?siteSection=3&id=4627



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. waiting to happen? it IS happening on a weekly basis
from levees failing and steam pipe explosions to bridge collapses, I say that since the 1980's days of 'screw you guys, I got mine' the infrastructure has been failing. We have roads in severe disrepair and utilities failing here in my home town on a regular basis. People then scream "fix it, but dont raise taxes". I hate to break it to people, but things cost money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. More money for war, less money for infrastructure, health care, and education.
That's the prevailing trend in America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. While I understand and approve of any illumination cast on the
tragic failure of the self absorbed denizens in the government, I am appalled at the self-indulgent, factually challenged editorializing of the matter. When an ignorant writer or commenter makes up facts to support his thesis it casts a pall on any factual reporting and complicates the process of bringing about important change.

The statement that cars are bigger today than in the heyday of bridge building is simply false. Most cars, those days, weighed two tons and more, with my '62 Ford convertible tipping the scales at over five thousand pounds, more than a half-ton pickup truck, today.
Today's cars generally come in at a ton and a half or less.

Big trucks, however, in the pursuit of profit, have been repeatedly been authorized to carry larger and larger loads, at the cost of roadway destruction and increased fuel usage.

Also, the problems of increasing demand on transmission and generation of electricity is not the cause of the current and impending catastrophes, although it contributes.
The problem arises from eating the seed corn--the practice, demanded by profit hungry investors, of deliberately canceling or deferring scheduled maintenance and upgrading, trying to get a few more years out of a failing system is the real culprit.
Those few years are now gone. The devil is now here to collect his due.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC