Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why did Bush attack Iraq? It wasn't for his amusement.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:47 AM
Original message
Why did Bush attack Iraq? It wasn't for his amusement.
It was for far worse.

Bush knew they didn't have WMD. He wanted to get Saddam, and he obviously didn't care that he would be destroying a country and contributing to the death of nearly one million Iraqis.

He did it for his own ego and to benefit his friends.

From the day Bush lied to start the war to the day he sanctioned torture to his continued arrogance, he doesn't deserve blind or shut-one-eye respect.

Why he continues to subject the Iraqi people to an unnecessary tragedy is beyond comprehension, but it's not amusing.

I suspect members of Congress would be censured for saying Bush is sending our soldiers to get their heads blown off for power and profit. I'll even acknowledge decorum and say it may not be appropriate, but it's not wrong.

Bush's actions are illegal (and possibly criminal), but not amusing.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sadie4629 Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. I believe
that he really thought, erroneously and misguidedly, that he could make Iraq the central battlefield for his war on terror. Don't know if he knew there were no WMD, but I think he thought he could lure AQ to Iraq and wipe them out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. He knew their were no WMDs.
US and foreign intell knew it. The IAEA knew it. He intentionally mislead the country to get the war he wanted.

And if he really thought that he could lure AQ in and destroy them, he's an idiot. He knew that AQ was in Afghanistan and Rummy watched OBL and other top AQ move to Pakistan. Rummy even called off the strike, when they were in our sites.

He didn't make honest mistakes. He committed war crimes for profiteers and power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. That's his justification
that isn't his motive.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. He knew
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. The last 3 nations w oil of significance...Bush and the GOP needs that OIL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. He invaded for political power
“He was thinking about invading Iraq in 1999,” said author and journalist Mickey Herskowitz. “It was on his mind. He said to me: ‘One of the keys to being seen as a great leader is to be seen as a commander-in-chief.’ And he said, ‘My father had all this political capital built up when he drove the Iraqis out of Kuwait and he wasted it.’ He said, ‘If I have a chance to invade….if I had that much capital, I’m not going to waste it. I’m going to get everything passed that I want to get passed and I’m going to have a successful presidency.”

Herskowitz said that Bush expressed frustration at a lifetime as an underachiever in the shadow of an accomplished father. In aggressive military action, he saw the opportunity to emerge from his father’s shadow. The moment, Herskowitz said, came in the wake of the September 11 attacks. “Suddenly, he’s at 91 percent in the polls, and he’d barely crawled out of the bunker.”

http://www.gnn.tv/articles/article.php?id=761



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. No, it wasn't.
Which makes Stark's statement even more tepid, doesn't it? And yet he was smacked down by his own people for stating the obvious (not in the word "amusement" but in the implication that Bush regime doesn't give fuck about soldiers, children, or anything other than bottom line of crony contracters).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC