Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. mishandled Arar case, admits Rice (time to cover up for lies)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 03:37 PM
Original message
U.S. mishandled Arar case, admits Rice (time to cover up for lies)

U.S. mishandled Arar case, admits Rice

By Deborah Charles
1 hour, 13 minutes ago

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice admitted on Wednesday the United States had mishandled the case of a Canadian who was deported to Syria and tortured, but she stopped short of an apology.

In a rare public admission of U.S. fault, Rice sounded contrite when she responded to a lawmaker's question about Maher Arar, who was arrested during a stopover in New York in 2002 and deported to Syria where he says he was tortured and imprisoned for a year.

"We do not think that this case was handled as it should have been," Rice told the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee. "We do absolutely not wish to transfer anyone to any place in which they might be tortured."

<...>

Last week U.S. lawmakers from both parties urged the Bush administration to apologize to Arar, a software engineer who is married with two children.

Rice did not apologize in the hearing and avoided directly answering a question from Massachusetts Democrat Rep. William Delahunt who asked if she knew Arar was tortured in Syria.

"You are aware of the fact that he was tortured?" Delahunt asked.

"I am aware of claims that were made," she responded.

But when asked if the United States had received any diplomatic assurances from Syria that Arar would not be tortured, Rice said her memory of the events had faded and she would have to respond later to the question.

more





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. "she would have to respond later to the question."
Translation: She will never speak about it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. She's a lying piece of petrified shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Beware of those "fading" memories
Pretty soon she won't be able to recall any of the war crimes she perpetrated.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. faded memories of the assurances regarding torture in Syria
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. That's a blatant lie, Condi, and you know it, and we know it.


"We do absolutely not wish to transfer anyone to any place in which they might be tortured."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. And people wonder why the likes of Desiree show up and place
their red-painted hands to her face and call her a war criminal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. Did anyone ask her why the US "deported" a Canadian citizen to Syria?
Why not to the authorities in Canada? Instead they put him on one of their charter planes, took him to Jordan to be transported to Syria. Why was any of this done if not for purposes of a kind of interrogation that would not be allowed within the US or Canada?

Basic question, why "deport" a Canadian citizen to Syria in the first place? Did anyone ask her that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. He is a Syrian citizen would be the answer.
Someone put his name on a "Suspected Terrorist" List. That should be investigated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. He's a Canadian citizen & was traveling on a Canadian passport. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Canada has apologized and given him 10 million dollars
He is still not allowed in the US. Had to testify before Congress by telephone, even though a thorough investigation proves his innocence. Our government is so stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Something else they should have asked Condi was the working relationship with Syria in
regards to extraordinary renditions. The Arar case wasn't a one off deal. He wasn't simply "deported" to Syria. The US was working with Syria, a "terrorist state" according to the State Dept, and Syria was cooperating with the US in accepting such renditions for purposes of "interrogation."

Arar sued the US, but the gov't prevailed on the grounds that his case involved matters of "national security" that couldn't be revealed. The case was dropped. No doubt the gov't didn't want to reveal the extent to which they actively worked with a state that sponsors terrorism and uses torture as an interrogation method.

Thus no surprise that they don't want Arar in the US. He's not a threat to national security but he's a living example of the kinds of things the gov't has done in the name of national security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pingzing58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
12. How many months does she have in her job? The clock is ticking and she needs to be reminded of that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC