Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry sends letter to Erik Prince requesting documents

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 02:16 PM
Original message
Kerry sends letter to Erik Prince requesting documents
10/26/2007

Kerry Demands Investigation of Blackwater Tax Filings

Rather Than Hide Behind Bush Administration, Blackwater Should Come Clean on Taxes

WASHINGTON—Today Senator John Kerry (D-Mass.), pressed for more information about Blackwater USA’s alleged tax evasion. The private security firm has been under fire for hiding behind a Bush Administration business size ruling that classified some of their workers as independent contractors rather than employees to avoid paying at least $31 million in taxes. As a senior member of the Finance Committee, Kerry sent a letter to the Committee’s leadership requesting an investigation be conducted into Blackwater’s tax filings.


Kerry, also Chairman of the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, called on Blackwater to explain their decision to use the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) classification of their employees for tax purposes. Earlier this week, Kerry asked the SBA to provide documentation on any rulings made on Blackwater. In a letter to Kerry, SBA Administrator Steven Preston wrote, “SBA’s size determinations are solely for the purposes of ascertaining eligibility for our small business programs and have no applicability to tax liability matters.”


The text of the letters sent to the Senators Max Baucus (D-Mont.), and Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), Chairman and Ranking Member of the Committee on Finance and to Mr. Erik Prince, Chairman of Prince Group, the parent company of Blackwater USA, are below:


October 26, 2007
The Honorable Max Baucus
Chairman
Committee on Finance
219 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510


The Honorable Charles Grassley
Ranking Member
Committee on Finance
219 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510


Dear Senators Baucus and Grassley:


Earlier in the week, I sent a letter to Small Business Administrator Stephen C. Preston regarding a press release issued by Blackwater Worldwide in response to House Committee on Oversight and Government Chairman’s Waxman inquiry about possible tax evasion by Blackwater Security Consulting, LLC. The letter inquired about the following statement by Blackwater: “The U.S. Small Business Administration has determined in an official finding applying ‘the criteria used by the IRS for Federal income purpose,’ that ‘Blackwater security contractors are not employees.’’’


I received a prompt response from SBA Administrator Preston indicating that the Small Business Administration issued a size determination regarding Presidential Airways, an affiliate of Blackwater. As expected, the letter states that “…SBA’s size determinations are solely for the purpose of ascertaining eligibility for our small business programs and have no applicability to tax liability matters.”


I am troubled that Blackwater erroneously and inappropriately relied on an SBA size determination for the classification of its workers. SBA incorporates IRS tax criteria as an element in whether personnel are employees for determination of size. In March 2007, the IRS issued a letter to Blackwater ruling that it improperly misclassified a security guard in Afghanistan as an independent contractor. I am concerned that Blackwater is misclassifying its personnel for tax purposes.


Since the Finance Committee has jurisdiction over revenue matters generally, I request that our Committee conduct an investigation of Blackwater to determine if they are evading taxes due to the erroneous misclassification of workers. I share your concerns about the tax gap and believe that the misclassification of workers is a contributing factor and that it is an issue which the Finance Committee should address.


I am enclosing for your reference the letter I sent to the SBA and the response. In addition, I am enclosing a letter that I sent to Blackwater inquiring why they relied upon a SBA size determination for tax purposes.


Thank you in advance for consideration of this important issue. Please keep me apprised of actions on this issue and let me know if you need any additional information from the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.


Sincerely,


John F. Kerry
Chairman



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


October 26, 2007


Mr. Erik Prince Chairman
The Prince Group
1650 Tyson Boulevard, Suite 800
McLean, VA 22102


Dear Mr. Prince:


Earlier in the week, I sent a letter to Small Business Administrator Stephen C. Preston regarding a press release issued by Blackwater Worldwide in response to House Committee on Oversight and Government Chairman’s Waxman inquiry about possible tax evasion by Blackwater Security Consulting, LLC. The letter inquired about the following statement by Blackwater: “The U.S. Small Business Administration has determined in an official finding applying ‘the criteria used by the IRS for Federal income purpose,’ that ‘Blackwater security contractors are not employees.’’’


I received a prompt response from SBA Administrator Preston indicating that the Small Business Administration issued a size determination regarding Presidential Airways, an affiliate of Blackwater. As expected, the letter states that “…SBA’s size determinations are solely for the purpose of ascertaining eligibility for our small business programs and have no applicability to tax liability matters.”


I would like to know why Blackwater relied on or referenced an SBA size determination for classifying its workers for tax purposes. Please send me any documents related to the SBA size determination and your classification of workers as employees for tax purposes,an explanation of the chain of command of Blackwater workers who are deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the status of any IRS audit of Blackwater and any related companies.


Thank you in advance for your cooperation.


Sincerely,



John F. Kerry
Chairman


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. INTERESTING! I first heard the "independent contractor" issue raised by Peter B. Collins
on his radio show, at least two months ago.

I suspect other folks were on this thing as well, but if he had anything to do with raising awareness of this, good for him.

And, of course, good for Kerry. Let's see where this one leads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. good work, Sen. Kerry
Fingers crossed they (Blackwater, Bushco) pay for this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. i got a feeling erik only works for republicans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Was this a "strongly-worded letter", or can we expect that later?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I wouldn't expend too much energy focusing on irrelevant semantics, let's
wait and see where this goes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Maybe you should look at this description of John Kerry's
questioning on Iraq/Contra.

"ohn Kerry had the chance, at that point, for the first time in a secret session -- and declassified since -- to ask administration officials questions. One of the people he asked questions of was Elliot Abrams, who was the person who was in charge of the Contra policy. Through that hearing -- I read the transcript many months later -- John asked Elliot question after question after question. Very specific questions, one leading to the next, about what he knew and didn't know, about that airplane that went down in Nicaragua, that was moving weapons to the Contras.

It was a long hearing. John asked most of the questions. When that hearing got out, no one said very much to the press. The hearing was in a secret hearing room of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. …

I remember David Durenberger turning to John as they were just getting out of that room, and as I was waiting for him. Durenberger at the time was chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee. He was a Republican from Minnesota. He said, "They're not telling the truth. These guys are not telling the truth. Keep going. Don't stop. Stay with it, John. Stay with it, John."

Here's the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, a Republican, telling a junior Democrat, who doesn't have any committee, or any particular jurisdictional rights here, "Keep going." And it was John's questions that caused Eliot Abrams to wind up getting indicted for not telling the truth to Congress. John's a prosecutor. John follows the facts. The facts matter."

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/choice2004/interviews/winer.html

I'm not saying this is anything like the Iran/Contra affair where Kerry had investiagated these people for about 2 years at that point, the similarity is that he is asking specific questions, meticulously approaching a conclusion. Getting Blackwater on Tax evasion is not as spectacular as getting them on the worst things they have done - but it is better than nothing.

Interesting use of his position on the Finance Committee. I hope he can push Baucus into having hearings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. For IRS purposes, "Blackwater security contractors are NOT EMPLOYEES" -- Hold those paychecks, then!
Thanks for posting this -- & kudos to John Kerry for pursuing this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. Obama, Durbin, Kerry Call for Investigations of Alleged Blackwater Tax Dodge

Obama, Durbin, Kerry Call for Investigations of Alleged Blackwater Tax Dodge

By Paul Kiel - October 26, 2007, 2:49PM

The mad proliferation of Blackwater investigations continues.

Earlier this week, House sleuth Henry Waxman (D-CA) accused Blackwater of hiding "tens of millions of dollars, if not more" in Social Security, Medicare and retirement taxes by classifying its security guards in Iraq as independent contractors.

Today, Sens. Barack Obama (D-IL), Dick Durbin (D-IL), and Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) piled on, asking for investigations of Blackwater's alleged tax dodge.

<...>

As for Kerry, he wants the Senate Finance Committee, of which he's a member, to dig in and investigate too. So he wrote Chairman Max Baucus (R-MT) and ranking member Chuck Grassley (R-IA) to request an investigation.

All of the senators don't think much of Blackwater's reliance on a determination by the Small Business Administration that they could classify guards as independent contractors. First of all, as Spencer reported earlier this week, the SBA determination only dealt with an employee in Guam. More importantly, the SBA says it carries "no legal weight."

Unfortunately for Blackwater, Kerry is also the Chairman of the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, and he's on the case. Now he wants Blackwater to explain what the SBA finding has to do with anything. His letter to Prince, sent today, is also below.

Obama and Durbin's letter to U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson:

more


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. kick and rec!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. Doing what he does best, which is investigating folks
That's my John.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. Kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. ditto
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
13. can someone explain why it might be inappropriate for Blackwater to pay their people as contractors?
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 12:38 AM by aikoaiko
I don contact work (not for Blackwater or security), and I get a 1099.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
14. So Do These Contractors Bring Their Own Helicopters To Work?
Over a decade ago, I had an employer who attempted to get everyone who worked in his radio station to sign on as an "independent contractor"...thus avoiding paying any unemployment or benefits. His line at the time was "sign the form and be assured you'll have a job in six months". Fortunately (and thanks to a few of us who called his bluff), the IRS came after him as the "contractor" idea was well and good as long as the employees brought their own "tools to work"...meaning a transmitter. To be more specific, since he determined the conditions of their employment and had them show up at a specific time and place they weren't "independent" at all. He ended up paying several thousand in back taxes. Of course, many of the poor suckers who had to cover their own taxes never got reimbursed.

So if my understanding of the contractor laws still apply, unless their soldiers provide their own guns, hellicopter and even their own war, they are employees. NAIL 'EM!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
15. Kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YvonneCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
16. That's my president...
...Thank you, sir! :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC