Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Harvard University opinion: "Why Gore Shouldn't Run"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Harper_is_Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 09:32 AM
Original message
Harvard University opinion: "Why Gore Shouldn't Run"
Why Gore Shouldn't Run

Staying out of D.C. makes Gore the smartest environmentalist in the country
Published On Sunday, October 28, 2007 11:54 PM
By JESSICA C. COGGINS

After the 2000 elections, Democrats around the country found themselves at a loss for words. The unthinkable had happened and George W. Bush—so inept he can’t even pronounce the word “nuclear”—was moving into the White House. And for the loser of that election? It seems Al Gore ’69 consoled himself with donuts and grew a beard any aspiring Mountain Man would be proud to bear.

Flash forward several years and Gore’s an Oscar-winning, PowerPoint junkie. He’s included in Time Magazine’s “100 Most Influential People in the World” under scientists and thinkers.
By all accounts he’s single-handedly credited with teaching an entire nation about global warming — and the Nobel committee agrees.

snip

It’s possible that we now live in an era in which politicians and the other goons in Washington are actually detrimental, or, at best, ineffectual, in enacting policy. It seems counterintuitive: After all we elect these people to competently steer the country in the right direction.
But now more than ever, the influence of elected and appointed officials has reached a new low. The public realizes they’re actually paid to be sleazy and self-absorbed.

And what makes Gore so valuable to our country is that he’s no longer among the ranks of these politicians. If he did decide to make a run for the White House again, it’d be akin to sinking his success down a toilet.

rest here...
http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=520371


I'm posting this for two reasons.

1. I think she makes an interesting case and agree with many things she says...especially in saying that Gore should be "single-handedly credited with teaching an entire nation about global warming"

and

2. I was recently accused of posting "frequent" "hysterical threads" "railing against a Gore run" in the last six months, and little else. Absolute nonsense, on all counts. As well, I (nor any DU'er) should not have to defend myself against personal attacks and accusations of nefarious motivations when we provide our opinions.
It's an attempt to intimidate.

So, when I stumbled upon this column in my daily search for global warming news, I knew I just had to respectfully post it. Non-hysterically, of course.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AlGore-08.com Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Following this logic, we should never support any one who is running for any political office
Because they are all corrupt and incompetent. All.

And when we find exceptional leaders who are neither corrupt, nor incompetent, who can do great things outside of office - - we should urge them to never run for office.

We should leave our government in the hands of corrupt, incompetent people.

And somehow, the problems of the world will get solved despite having our government run by corrupt, incompetent people...

If you follow this logic to it's conclusion, anybody who agrees with this oped should never vote for anybody in any race - - they certainly should not be wasting their time supporting a Democratic Presidential candidate in the primary or the general election. They should instead stay home all during 2008 and teach their neighbors that they last thing they should ever do is look for a political solution to the world's problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. And by this logic we should a just sit down and give up because
we have no hope of changing things for the better. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harper_is_Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I think you should read the article.
It's clear you did not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harper_is_Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. You are focussing on one line of the piece. The overall theme is that Gore...
...can be more effectual and free to effect/inspire change from the grassroots upwards in his current role.

The response to that is usually something like "the POTUS has more power than anyone else on earth to effect change", to which I disagree. But regarding that, the power that Gore wields right now means he could essentially produce a climate change bill to the Dem hopefuls, and the one that pledges to make it law gets his endorsment. They'd be falling over themselves to agree. So then Gore controls US government policy, AND gets to continue inspiring needed change throughout the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. see my thread on Gore Haters
Al doesn't have to be a Politician.

Politicians are sleazy because they lie in order to fool us into giving them what they, and a privileged few, want.

Al can tell the the truth and because it is in the best interests of Mankind, the People will listen.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harper_is_Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Well, in that regard the piece was talking about public perception more than the person
see post 4 for what I see as the main theme of the opinion piece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. I tried to make this exact point a couple of weeks ago.
And was attacked unmercifully for it. Gore is a great man, and it's entirely possible that he can do more good for this country and this world as an activist than as a President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harper_is_Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. The opinion is legitimate. Don't let them intimidate you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. Mr. Gore seems
to understand the importance of the position. And I agree with him when he says he doesn't have to play the endless campaign game the way it's rigged now. I truly hope he throws his hat in the ring.

"But I am under no illusions that any position has as much ability to influence change as the presidency does. If the President made climate change the organizing principle, the filter through which everything else had to flow, then that could really make a huge difference."


"I have no plans to be a candidate. But, yes, it's true, I have not made a so- called Sherman statement and ruled it out for all time. I see no reason or necessity to do that.

But that's not an effort to be coy or to prop the door open or to invite such speculation. Look, I don't know why it's ordained that one -- that as soon as one presidential campaign is over with, the next one begins right away. I'm one of those who doesn't like to see the Christmas goods put into storage right after Halloween.

And I think the American people are not well-served by having an endless campaign. We are 500 days away from the next election. So why just sort of close up the field and say, OK, this is it. Place your bets. I don't have to play that game."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2 Much Tribulation Donating Member (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. Gore deserves immense credit, but I learned about global warming over a decade ago
and not from Gore. I think the fully accurate praise for Gore is already plenty good that slight hyperbole isn't needed. (unless "entire nation" means making an issue "pop" in which case maybe it's fully earned)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harper_is_Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. the article put it badly. "entire nation" should have been "entire world".
He's regarded with a much more respect outside of the USA than within.

He has put the issue on the map in the rest of the world. The USA is still behind in terms of taking the issue seriously, but I think Gore certainly made it the issue it is in the USA today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC