Why Gore Shouldn't RunStaying out of D.C. makes Gore the smartest environmentalist in the country
Published On Sunday, October 28, 2007 11:54 PM
By JESSICA C. COGGINS
After the 2000 elections, Democrats around the country found themselves at a loss for words. The unthinkable had happened and George W. Bush—so inept he can’t even pronounce the word “nuclear”—was moving into the White House. And for the loser of that election? It seems Al Gore ’69 consoled himself with donuts and grew a beard any aspiring Mountain Man would be proud to bear.
Flash forward several years and Gore’s an Oscar-winning, PowerPoint junkie. He’s included in Time Magazine’s “100 Most Influential People in the World” under scientists and thinkers.
By all accounts he’s single-handedly credited with teaching an entire nation about global warming — and the Nobel committee agrees.snip
It’s possible that we now live in an era in which politicians and the other goons in Washington are actually detrimental, or, at best, ineffectual, in enacting policy. It seems counterintuitive: After all we elect these people to competently steer the country in the right direction.
But now more than ever, the influence of elected and appointed officials has reached a new low. The public realizes they’re actually paid to be sleazy and self-absorbed. And what makes Gore so valuable to our country is that he’s no longer among the ranks of these politicians. If he did decide to make a run for the White House again, it’d be akin to sinking his success down a toilet.
rest here...
http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=520371 I'm posting this for two reasons.
1. I think she makes an interesting case and agree with many things she says...especially in saying that Gore should be "single-handedly credited with teaching an entire nation about global warming"
and
2. I was recently accused of posting "frequent" "hysterical threads" "railing against a Gore run" in the last six months, and little else. Absolute nonsense, on all counts. As well, I (nor any DU'er) should not have to defend myself against personal attacks and accusations of nefarious motivations when we provide our opinions.
It's an attempt to intimidate.
So, when I stumbled upon this column in my daily search for global warming news, I knew I just had to respectfully post it. Non-hysterically, of course.