Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Panel Posts Text It Said Was Deleted From CDC on Global Warming Testimony

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 01:41 PM
Original message
Panel Posts Text It Said Was Deleted From CDC on Global Warming Testimony
Panel Posts Text It Said Was Deleted From CDC on Global Warming Testimony
By John Reichard, CQ HealthBeat Editor

Material deleted by the White House from congressional testimony this week on the public health impact of global warming included statements that climate change is a serious public health concern, that its health effects remain “largely unaddressed,” and that “many Americans will likely experience difficult challenges,” according to a Senate committee.

Other statements edited out of the testimony by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Julie L. Gerberding say that children and the elderly are disproportionately at risk and that climate change could lead to the scarcity of food and rising food prices. Also dropped: “Catastrophic weather events such as heat waves and hurricanes are expected to become more frequent.”

Gerberding’s Oct. 23 testimony before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee” was heavily edited during the review process coordinated by the White House’s Office of Management and Budget,” said Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., who chairs the panel. Revisions that trimmed the length of the testimony from 12 pages to 6 pages removed “most of the specific information about the health impacts of global warning,” Boxer said in a Oct. 25 statement.

A document identified as draft CDC testimony released by Boxer’s office includes paragraph after paragraph of lined out material. A CDC spokesman declined to either confirm or deny the authenticity of material identified by the committee majority as deleted. The spokesman, Tom Skinner, said that despite the impression created by media reports about the edits, Gerberding was able to fully express her views in oral testimony before the panel and that she said everything she wanted and needed to say on the issue. Gerberding told a press luncheon the day after her testimony, "I feel very confident we had a completely honest conversation" with lawmakers. She called press coverage about the edited material "the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard."

The final version of Gerberding’s testimony does not dispute that “climate change” will lead to ill health effects. But it refers to such effects largely in general terms and emphasizes CDC tracking systems that will help deal with the possibility of ill effects. John Marburger, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, said in a statement Friday that the editing changes were needed because of an “overall lack of precision” in assertions made by the original draft. Changes also were needed to assure its consistency with the current state of climate science, he added.

Lined-out statements included the following:

• “Scientific evidence supports the view that the earth’s climate is changing. A broad array of organizations ... is working to address climate change. Despite this extensive activity, the public health effects of climate change remain largely unaddressed. CDC considers climate change a serious public health concern.”

• Health effects are expected to be less severe than in the developing world. “Nevertheless, many Americans will likely experience difficult challenges. Catastrophic weather events such as heat waves and hurricanes are expected to become more frequent, severe, and costly; the U.S. population is anticipated to continue to age and move to vulnerable locations such as coastal areas, increasing exposures to specific risks; and concurrent challenges such as water scarcity in certain regions could limit our resilience ...”

• “One of the most likely climate change projections is an increase in frequency of hot days, hot nights, and heat waves. The United States is expected to see an increase in the severity, duration, and frequency of extreme heat waves. This, coupled with an aging population, increases the likelihood of higher mortality as the elderly are more vulnerable to dying from exposure to excessive heat. Midwestern and northeastern cities are at greatest risk, as heat-related illness and death appear to be related to exposure to temperatures much hotter than those to which the population is accustomed.”

• “Future climate projections also show likely increases in the frequency of heavy rainfall events, posing an increased risk of flooding events and overwhelming of sanitation infrastructure.”

• “Some studies have shown that higher surface temperatures, especially in urban areas, encourage the formation of ground level ozone...Ozone can irritate the respiratory system, reduce lung function, aggravate asthma, and inflame and damage cells that line the lungs.”

• “Changes in precipitation, temperature, humidity, and water salinity have been shown to affect the quality of water used for drinking, recreation, and commercial use.”

• Ecological changes stemming from climate change could “alter the range, seasonality, and human incidence of many ... diseases,” including Lyme disease, West Nile virus, and make it easier for “exotic vector-borne” diseases to spread to the United States.

• Climate change could cause changes in agricultural production. “This may lead to scarcity of some foods, increase food prices, and threaten access to food for Americans who experience food insecurity.”

• “Some populations of Americans are more vulnerable to the health effects of climate change than others. Children are at greater risk of worsening asthma, allergies, and certain infections diseases...”


The material removed also identifies particular areas of the country as being at greater risk, and also certain populations, such as minorities, because of where they live and their socioeconomic status.

more...

http://public.cq.com/docs/hb/hbnews110-000002614381.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for posting this, babylon sister. It is amazing that these charlatans aren't
tarred and feathered!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nannah Donating Member (690 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. thanks for posting this
sadly, a deeply cynical part of me suspects that this information was removed because the die off from global warming and oil peak needs to be controlled so it affects the most vulnerable. we have predatory leadership in the world spawned by corporate governance; predators prey on the vulnerable.

Ignorance of global warning by leaders is not driving the pretense of denial; this is a strategy to manage the die off and keep it focused on the most vulnerable. It wasn't the wealthy who died and lost everything in Katrina. It won't be the wealthy whose home won't be replaced in California; and it was the wealthy who knew enough to have their own fire departments on site, you will find that the bushes and cheneys are well situated to ride out water, oil, food shortages. They own land on huge aquifirs; they have well stocked undergrround bunkers; they will always have the cash to buy what they need. They know the truth and are making their own plans.

george bush isn't stupid; he is sly like a fox; he has always been able to manipulate people with success; the key to his success is that he has no limits to what he will do to acheive his ends; blackmail has always struck me as his style, with some dramatic lessons of punishment thrown in to get everyone's attention. He is narcissitic, cruel, petulant, sociopathic, but not stupid. there are many ways to be smart; interest in intellectual pursuits isn't everyone's schtick. george is a showman, a player, a front man; it's what he does.

Blocking info re: global warming and at the same time reducing the resources to meet expectable need is damage management.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyskye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. K & R for transparency!

Thanks so much for posting this! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLib at work Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. One more K & R ..just to spite BushCo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. Barbaara Boxer's email on this travesty:
The wildfires in California are a great tragedy. And unfortunately, as global warming increases the likelihood of extreme weather conditions -- hurricanes, droughts, floods, and others -- these kinds of disasters may become even more frequent.

According to the San Francisco Chronicle, forestry experts believe rising global temperatures will result in an increased risk of fires. And news that the Bush Administration censored a climate change report by the Director of the Center for Disease Control (CDC) last week confirms -- again -- that the President refuses to face the dangers of global warming.

Tell the Bush Administration to come clean on all of the facts surrounding global warming: Forward an email to the President and demand the full truth about the CDC Director's testimony today!

Last week, the Director of the CDC, Dr. Julie Geberding, testified at a Senate Environment and Public Works Committee hearing that I chaired. Before the hearing, Dr. Geberding provided the White House with a copy of the testimony she was preparing to deliver about the health risks associated with global warming -- but Administration officials slashed her report in half.

What information was included in the pages that were deleted from Dr. Gerberding's testimony? Many details that attributed potential public health problems to global warming -- as well as statements like, "Scientific evidence supports the view that the earth's climate is changing...CDC considers climate change a serious public health concern."

A CDC official familiar with both versions of Dr. Gerberding's testimony said that the Director's findings were "eviscerated."

Tell the Bush Administration to come clean on all of the facts surrounding global warming: Forward an email to the President and demand the full truth about the CDC Director's testimony today!

President Bush cannot continue to muzzle scientists -- especially on one of the most critical environmental challenges that we have ever faced.

We deserve a full accounting of what happened during this White House review process, and who was involved, to make sure that this kind of scientific censorship from the Bush Administration never happens again.

This is just one more example of how the Bush Administration is hiding the truth from the American people -- changing scientific reports to fit their policy, rather than fitting their policy to science.

Tell the Bush Administration to come clean on all of the facts surrounding global warming: Forward an email to the President and demand the full truth about the CDC Director's testimony today!

Thank you for your help.

In Friendship,



Barbara Boxer
U.S. Senator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, babylonsister.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. K&R dana perino lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. no way. she's not bright enough.
she gives dumb blonds a bad name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. "I feel very confident we had a completely honest conversation"
Well gosh, I feel better now! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. yeah the press coverage of this misadministration is ridiculous -- I'll agree with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. Kicked for the night crowd. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC