Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

omigosh, lookee here, the nutjob conspiracy theorists got one right

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 12:47 PM
Original message
omigosh, lookee here, the nutjob conspiracy theorists got one right
London Police Found Guilty of Health and Safety Failures in Brazilian's Shooting Death

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/B/BRITAIN_BRAZILIAN_SHOT?SITE=NVREN&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

By JILL LAWLESS
Associated Press Writer


(AP) -- A jury on Thursday found London's police force guilty of violating health and safety laws in a high-stakes anti-terrorist operation that led to the shooting death of a Brazilian man mistaken for a suicide bomber.

London's Metropolitan Police was convicted of placing lives at risk and fined $362,000 in the operation that led to the death of 27-year-old Jean Charles de Menezes on July 22, 2005.

The forces was also assessed $798,000 in prosecution costs.

Prosecutors told the jury at London's Central Criminal Court that police killed de Menezes and put the lives of others at risk during their anti-terrorism operation because of flawed planning and chaos at headquarters.

The force had denied the charge, saying the killing was an error, not a crime. Police chief Ian Blair issued a statement after the verdict, expressing "my deepest regrets" over the killing.


I suppose if I had a longer lunch break I might search the records and identify all the sane adults who denigrated anyone who thought this might be a bullshit terror killing, but I suspect they know who they are. So a hearty screw you - you know who you are
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Out of curiousity, how does this relate to the nutjob conspiracy theorists?
Because this was never a conspiracy theory, and doesn't have anything to do with conspiracy theories. It was pretty apparent once the accurate reports started coming in that this was a case of screwup on the part of the police.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. There was a period of days when the London police stuck to their story that he was a terrorist
only after the drip drip drip of contradictory info did the rest of us realize they were lying. There is a group of people who simply will give the authorities the benefit of the doubt regardless of the circumstances. Others among us know what bullshit smells like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. wrong. why do people make shit up when it's so easy to
check. I knew you were wrong, and you are. Within a day the cops came out and said it was a mistake. You should know what bullshit smells like, you spew enough of it.

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0724-05.htm

From wiki

"The day after the shooting, the Metropolitan Police identified the victim as Jean Charles de Menezes, and said that he had not been carrying explosives, nor was he connected in any way to the attempted bombings. They issued an apology describing the incident as "a tragedy, and one that the Metropolitan Police Service regrets."

The de Menezes' family condemned the shooting and rejected the apology. His grandmother said there was "no reason to think he was a terrorist." It was reported that the dead man's family were offered almost £585,000 compensation.<16>"



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #17
31. The article you cite continues the lies perpetrated by the metro police.
Yes within a day or so they admitted that de Menezes was not carrying explosives. They continued to lie about the circumstances of his execution, for example:

"The address in Tulse Hill was identified from materials found inside the bombers' unexploded rucksacks on Thursday and was immediately put under surveillance. When Menezes, dressed in baseball cap, blue fleece and baggy trousers, emerged from it at around 10am on Friday, he was followed. When he headed for the nearby tube station, officers decided to arrest him. An armed unit took over, ordering him to stop. He did not. His unseasonably thick jacket apparently prompted concern that he had explosives strapped beneath.

Witnesses said the man jumped the ticket barriers and was chased into the station, where he half-tripped boarding a train. He was allegedly pushed to the floor by armed police, then, according to eyewitnesses, an officer fired five shots into his head.

Police quickly discovered he did not have a bomb, but it was not until yesterday that he was cleared of any involvement.

Officers are trained to look for 'precursor activities' indicating a suicide bomber about to detonate his explosive, thought to include a look of agitation combined with a sense of disconnection from the world. The Met said Menezes' 'clothing and behavior' caused concerns."

All of that is total bullshit except that de Menezes lived at the wrong house and left for work on the wrong day.

de Menezes was never ordered to stop. He did not jump a turnstile. He did not act at all suspciously. He was not wearing an unseasonably thick jacket. He was followed into the train station (inexplicably as he could have been stopped outside the station) by a team trained in israeli counter terrorist 'krato' techniques, who then exercised the primary feature of those techniques, which is the unannounced multiple headshot execution of the victim.

You can pretend that what happened didn't happen but that does not change reality, just your perception of it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. yes, they blew it big time, and now they've been found culpable
but to state that it was a conspiracy, is absurd. Or do you really think it was a conspiracy to kill this young man from Brazil?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. They have been whitewashed and the procedure remains in force.
Edited on Thu Nov-01-07 03:05 PM by endarkenment
The only problem with the deliberate execution of innocents was that other innocents were put in danger.

Was there a conspiracy to make an example of a suspect? Yes. Hardly even a secret. If you train a team to use these techniques, you intend to conduct summary executions, and your intention is primarily to make a public example in order to terrorize a population into submission. Job done. Aided by the usual chorus.

Oh, and you of course can't even address the continued lies documented by the article you posted, which you continue to cite as evidence of 'no coverup' numerous times in this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Again. That's not a conspiracy
and of course, you're not taking into account the fact that this happened shortly after a bombing that killed over 50 people. You have zilch in the way of evidence to support your statement that the intention was to terrorize a population into submission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. Nothing, nothing at all. The nutjobs are still nutjobs, and this guy's still dead.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, that "conspiracy theory" was
pretty damn obvious..that poor guy! The overzealous London police with toady blur revving up the stakes, no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingshakabobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Only it wasn't a conspiracy to murder the man.
:eyes:



......back to the drawing board for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. No, Einstien the conspiracy was to try and cover it up.
backatcha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingshakabobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Where is your evidence of a cover-up, Columbo?
Edited on Thu Nov-01-07 01:06 PM by Kingshakabobo
Hint: erroneous news reports in the immediate aftermath don't count.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Forget erroneous news reports; howzabout DISHONEST POLICE REPORTS?
They stated he was wearing an unseasonably heavy coat that could have concealed a bomb;
That turned out to be UNTRUE.

They claimed he was confronted, and ignored orders to "stop";
That turned out to be UNTRUE.

They claimed he jumped a turnstile fleeing them;
That turned out to be UNTRUE.



The TRUTH is, an innocent man was minding his own business
when London police crept up and shot him 5 times in the head.

THEN they invented a BS story to justify the shooting;
A BS story that fell apart upon examination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. LOL!
This wasn't EVER a conspiracy theory. So sorry about that. And if you'd followed the story, you'd know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. ditto the above posters. This was obvious from the moment
a few facts came out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. I've found that the "nutjob conspiracy theorists" are usually correct.
After all, if you always beleive the Official Story then you must believe that Saddam actually had WMDs, that the Bush Administration had no knowledge of a terrorist threat before 9/11, and that these are two pics of the same guy:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. not so. Aside from the fact that the OP is more than a little confused
about this story, CTers aren't usually right. But then it all depends by what you mean by conspiracy and conspiracy theories. There's a difference
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. And that nuclear weapons caused the Indonesian tsunami...
don't forget how that one turned out to be right too.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingshakabobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Hey, wasn't the Indonesian tsunami the reason the dungeon was built?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #18
32. Not sure, but it's as good a reason as any...
:hi:

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Basileus Basileon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
29. Yep. And the Moon landings were hoaxes,
Edited on Thu Nov-01-07 01:52 PM by Basileus Basileon


the Jews control the world's markets/media/governments/everything, we're going to secretly nuke Iran next week every single week, the Soviets are putting mind-control chemicals in our water, the government is spraying mind-control chemicals in the air, the Clintons killed Vince Foster, the Clintons are going to cede control of America to the UN, the homosexuals have infiltrated the media and are converting our children, Paul is Dead, the British Royal Family controls the world's markets, the government is working with aliens, the government secretly brought over Nazis to assume shadow control of the American government, McCain is a Manchurian Candidate, Iraq had WMDs but hid them/shipped them to Syria (that was indeed a CT), barcodes/UPCs are Satanic control devices, the military caused the tsunami, the Wingdings font proves that 9/11 was an inside job, KFC is owned by the Ku Klux Klan and makes black people impotent, AIDS is a CIA bioweapon against black people, Mexican immigrants are part of a secret plan to reannex the American Southwest, and the British Royal Family are actually reptilian humanoids.

Sure, yeah, conspiracy theories are always right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. that's funny. The best way to deal with a bully is to bloody his nose.
by the way, I never thought I would see that poster's name after I put her on ignore a year ago. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Is that better?
I definitely wouldn't want to disturb you :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. Hey, didn't I lose a bet over this???
I bet that this would turn out to be a mistake somehow, and the bettee said we'd wait one month. I said one month was too short but gave in...some DUer got a star because I lost the bet. Good for him/her. I hope he's digging the star, but it does appear I've been vindicated!

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. Even a broken clock ....
you know the rest.

Conspiracy theorists see a conspiracy in everything. But they conveniently ignore the majority of the time that their theories are completely unsupported by facts.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. yeah, except there's no conspiracy at all here.
bonehead cops thought he looked like one of those wanted in association with the underground bombings, tailed him, and blew it big time by pumping the poor guy full of bullets. But there was no conspiracy to kill him. The next day the police issued a statement and an apology- not that that's any comfort. But it was not a conspiracy and the OP hasn't even bothered to tell us what the purported conspiracy was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shain from kane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. The policemen were carrying guns. Definitely a conspiracy, because they normally carry only
nightsticks. They knew that if they Rodney Kinged him, and he lived to be a sympathetic figure, they would not be invited to The Policeman's Other Ball. Therefore, it was grab your guns and shoot anyone that looks like this picture. this profile picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #23
36. There are cops in London who are authorized to carry firearms
The cops that shot de Menezes were firearms carrying cops specifically deployed to the tube station after the surveillance team incorrectly identified him as a suspect in the bombings. Facts can be your friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shain from kane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. "Facts can be your friend." Ha! One of those sarcasm tags would be my bestest friend,
if I knew how to use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. True...
There's no conspiracy with this shooting. Just a fuck-up.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
19. Weren't the conspiracy theorists the cops who shot the guy?
They were nutjobs who theorized the guy was in a terrorist conspiracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tesla78 Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
21. Won't be the only time they have it right
Edited on Thu Nov-01-07 01:25 PM by tesla78
Unfortunately, conspiracies are sometimes true.

Examples:

U.S. History of human experimentation (MKULTRA, The Tuskegee Syphilis Study...)
Pre-planned Iraq war (Downing Street Memo)
Iran-Contra Affair
U.S. Election Fraud
CIA drug dealers
9/11 commission coverup (Video: 9/11 Press for Truth)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shain from kane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. Tesla was the subject of a conspiracy.

From the internets---

"Immediately after Tesla's death became known, the Federal Bureau of Investigation instructed the government's Alien Property Custodian office to take possession of his papers and property, despite his US citizenship. His safe at the hotel was also opened. At the time of his death, Tesla had been continuing work on the teleforce weapon, or death ray, that he had unsuccessfully marketed to the US War Department. It appears that his proposed death ray was related to his research into ball lightning and plasma and was imagined as a particle beam weapon. The US government did not find a prototype of the device in the safe. After the FBI was contacted by the War Department, his papers were declared to be top secret. The so-called "peace ray" constitutes a part of some conspiracy theories as a means of destruction. The personal effects were seized on the advice of presidential advisers, and J. Edgar Hoover declared the case "most secret", because of the nature of Tesla's inventions and patents. One document states that " is reported to have some 80 trunks in different places containing transcripts and plans having to do with his experiments <...>". Charlotte Muzar reported that there were several "missing" papers and property."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
24. I think the term conspiracy theory is misapplied here
more accurately, what you're referring to is the automatic willingness of some to accept the official version of events and discount any skeptics.

What you are saying is you were skeptical of the "official" version of this man's guilt, as was I, as opposed to many who stood by the police account unequivocably.

The conspiracy, actually, was the attempted police coverup, that didn't last very long as I recall.

It is however nice to see justice served, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Basileus Basileon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
27. That wasn't a conspiracy theory.
That was a shoddy cover-up of a fuck-up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. only there was no coverup. Within 24 hrs the cops
admitted that Jean Charles was not a terrorist suspect and was innocent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anarcho-Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
38. many of the nutjob conspiracy theorists on DU
were claiming that De Menezes was shot because he "found out that 7/7 was Mihop!!!!" Did that prove to be the case? No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC