Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who thinks the little monkey in a uniform Musharaff didn't check with his handlers in DC before...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 07:46 AM
Original message
Who thinks the little monkey in a uniform Musharaff didn't check with his handlers in DC before...
...he suspended the constitution in order to fight terrorism more effectively?

I promise this tin pot dictators doesn't do anything without getting the Okay from the Bush regime first.

He never has.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. His DC handlers told him not to do it, but he ignored them. That
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. His DC handlers talk out of both sides of their mouth regularly
We have to take that into consideration here.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. How is the US benefitting from this? I don't see an upside. It's just
another mess they're incapable of dealing with. Send in soldiers? Not likely-where would they get the warm bodies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. The situation was getting awful hot over there
So Musharaff is deposed and by election or coup another cleric-run state is born. With nukes. Another Bush fuckup. Or another opportunity to start banging the TERROR drum again. Either way, a dictator is preferable. Washington has always liked pliant authoritarians, better for business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. How much news have we had from Iraq today as the genocide continues?
None here on my TV.

Bush and his minions like that.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. "Little monkey in a uniform"?
racist much?

He's the President of Pakistan. Grow up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I call Bush a chimpanzee regularly around here
Edited on Mon Nov-05-07 07:58 AM by NNN0LHI
You must not have noticed?

And by the way anyone who calls a thuggish dictator a president has lost touch with reality.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I think you insulted MonkeyFunk's relatives ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. He's a tinpot dictator. I don't think the OP's remark is racist
and Musharaff isn't deserving of anything but condemnation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. I'm not defending Musharraf
I can't stand him.

But he's nobody's monkey, and to characterize him as such is silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. Not me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
11. Despite warnings, Bush officials couldn't stop Musharraf
Despite warnings, Bush officials couldn't stop Musharraf
By Renee Schoof and Warren P. Strobel | McClatchy Newspapers

* Posted on Saturday, November 3, 2007


WASHINGTON — The imposition of emergency rule on Saturday in nuclear-armed Pakistan underscores how little influence the Bush administration has on events in a country that has become the bulwark in the U.S. fight against terrorism.

U.S. officials moved quickly to denounce the order by Pakistan President Gen. Pervez Musharraf, which suspended the constitution and shut down non-government news media. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said the U.S. government was "deeply disturbed" by the move, which the White House called "very disappointing."

Washington's lack of influence, however, was palpable. On Friday, both Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, in Turkey for talks on Iraq, and Adm. William J. Fallon, the commander of U.S. forces in the Middle East, had warned Musharraf not to impose emergency rule. But Musharraf didn't even wait for Fallon, who was in Pakistan, to leave the country before making his declaration.

Foreign policy experts said there were few steps the administration could take to pressure Musharraf to change course.

more...

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/21076.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. yep. years of terrible foreign policy and a State dept that
is little more than a tool of the Defense Dept, have left us without influence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC