Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

IT IS GOING TO THE JUDICIARY!!!!!!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 04:25 PM
Original message
IT IS GOING TO THE JUDICIARY!!!!!!!!

CALL THEM, NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. are we sure? we might need a day to sort through this stuff
then tomorrow we dial
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hell Yes!
Edited on Tue Nov-06-07 04:28 PM by Botany
Dick Cheney's record gets to go in front of the Judicary Committee.


Did Boner just fuck up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rjones2818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. The 2nd vote was procedural.
The vote that's going on now is on sending it to committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. this vote is OUT OF ORDER! a vote on the previous question yields to privilege
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sazemisery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Thank you, Mr. Coffee
Not many people understand parliamentary procedure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. i only hope DK does!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why is that bad?
Because it can be killed unceremoniously?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. it will die in committee...been there since July
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. To CONYERS' Judiciary Committee you mean
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Conyers won't push for impeachment. Hell, he won't ALLOW it.
He's as compromised as the rest of the bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Now I am thoroughly confused...
First, HR 333 was going to be tabled by Hoyer. Then, Republicans stepped forward to save HR 333 from being tabled. So is the Kucinich resolution still a going concern or not? This is so weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kas125 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. The guy on c-span said that if they tabled, or didn't vote to send it
they'd have to have an hour long debate right then and there. The republicans did NOT want to debate the impeachment of Cheney, so they had to vote the way they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ben_meyers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. It is going to the Judiciary because the Repubs want it to
What does that tell you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I read recently that Conyers had to promise pelosi to stand against impeachment or she would not
let him chair the committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Is that why he is supporting the DLC in this? I wondered why he told the press
he will not support this bill.

These DC insider deals just suck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. It made sense to me. I can't imagine he doesn't want it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
15. Conyers won't let it get very far
he sayd thy have "important legislation" to attend to, not this messy impeachment stuff. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC