|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Saboburns (690 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:15 PM Original message |
Make Them stand up on the floor and DEFEND Dick Cheney. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
1. It's going back to the JC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
12. You're pretty confident Conyers will continue to stonewall it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 06:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
25. That saddens me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fresh_Start (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
2. They don't have to defend Cheney. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AuntPatsy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:25 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. Do you honestly believe that with a full scale investigation allowed that the smoking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fresh_Start (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:34 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. what full scale investigation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AuntPatsy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 06:19 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. And you don't believe that if an investigation was demanded and begun that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dflprincess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:09 PM Response to Reply #15 |
31. Isn't it the point of an investigation to gather evidence? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:26 PM Response to Reply #2 |
13. Innuendo? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fresh_Start (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:33 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. You really don't understand the difference between |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCKit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 06:08 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. I disagree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fresh_Start (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 06:11 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. But, there no proof of intention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AuntPatsy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 06:22 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. I would say a real judge would see those flimsy excuses by omg our government |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:14 PM Response to Reply #18 |
27. Actually I think you are wrong. I think Joe Wilson would be glad to talk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:17 PM Response to Reply #18 |
28. "He was wrong" can be an impeachable offense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buns_of_Fire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:59 PM Response to Reply #28 |
34. Why not? If you can convince the Senate to go along, that is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 06:46 PM Response to Reply #14 |
26. Then I guess all the constitutional lawyers and scholars |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
3. The JC that just gave the nod to Mukasy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:20 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Because you're a party pooper. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:21 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. That was Senate Judiciary -- DK's res goes to House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:23 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Yeah, Conyers who just said he thought it was a distraction from "important" work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:25 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Was that a recent Conyers quote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shrek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:21 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. No, the other one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbgrunt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:21 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. well that was the SENATE judiciary committee. This |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
9. Unfortunately for us... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kimmerspixelated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:45 PM Response to Original message |
16. I'm SOOOO confused! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 06:20 PM Response to Original message |
20. Holy fuck -- it is the voice of reason. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
voice of reason (161 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 06:37 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. no . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 06:42 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Oh, sorry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 06:23 PM Response to Original message |
22. Yes. Make them stand up and defend him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Saboburns (690 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
29. Mebbe you guys didn't hear about this one, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karenina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:07 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Good one! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Saboburns (690 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:22 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Somebody help me out here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dweller (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
32. when the approval ratings for DICK fall into the negative #'s |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC