Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feinstein: Blowjob worse than violating rights of millions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 09:27 AM
Original message
Feinstein: Blowjob worse than violating rights of millions
Edited on Sat Nov-10-07 09:31 AM by kpete
Feinstein: Blowjob worse than violating rights of millions: 1999, censure for Clinton. 2007, retroactive immunity for telcos

Submitted by lambert on Fri, 2007-11-09 19:05.

Bush Panopticon Department of You Can't Buff a Turd Diane Feinstein warrantless surveillance
Fresh from subjecting the body politic to cruel and unusual punishment by inflicting pro-torture Judge Mukasey on us at Justice, DiFi wrestles the Constitution to the ground and gratuitously kicks the carcass by attempting to destroy the rule of law entirely.

Yes—and I know this will surprise you—DiFi’s supporting retroactive immunity for the telcos.

With Democrats like this, who needs Republicans?

San Francisco Chronicle:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/11/09/BA13T97BN.DTL

Sen. Dianne Feinstein said Thursday that she favors legal immunity for telecommunications companies that allegedly shared millions of customers’ telephone and e-mail messages and records with the government, a position that could lead to the dismissal of numerous lawsuits pending in San Francisco.

In a statement at a hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is considering legislation to extend the Bush administration’s electronic surveillance program, Feinstein said the companies should not be “held hostage to costly litigation in what is essentially a complaint about administration activities.”


Wouldn’t it be wonderful if our Diane showed the same maternal solicitude for the millions of American citizens whose rights were destroyed?

Now, back in 1999, DiFi introduced a resolution to censure President Clinton:

http://www.cnsnews.com/InDepth/archive/199902/IND19990212c.html
Whereas William Jefferson Clinton, president of the United States, engaged in an inappropriate relationship with a subordinate employee in the White House, which was shameful, reckless and indefensible;

Whereas William Jefferson Clinton, president of the United States, deliberately misled and deceived the American people, and people in all branches of the United States government;

Whereas William Jefferson Clinton, president of the United States, gave false or misleading testimony and his actions have had the effect of impeding discovery of evidence in judicial
proceedings;

Whereas William Jefferson Clinton’s conduct in this matter is unacceptable for a president of the United States, does demean the office of the president as well as the president himself, and creates disrespect for laws of the land;

Whereas President Clinton fully deserves censure for engaging in such behavior;

Whereas future generations of Americans must know that such behavior is not only unacceptable but also bears grave consequences, including loss of integrity, trust and respect;

Whereas William Jefferson Clinton remains subject to criminal actions in a court of law like any other citizen;

When Clinton gets a blowjob, Diane gets very concerned about the rule of law. But when billion dollar telcos break the law, destroy the rights of millions of Americans, and then demand retroactive immunity? Not so much.


Oh, and the cream of the jest is that DiFi introduced this resolution after Clinton had already been acquitted. Honestly.

http://www.correntewire.com/feinstein_blowjob_worse_than_violating_rights_of_millions_1999_censure_for_clinton_2007_retroactive_immunity_for_telcos

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Um...did you have to say "cream of the jest"?
I agree with your point...just sayin'. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Feinstein is a despicable warmongering bitch
Plain and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. If this is what the Democratic party is becoming we are all doomed
I can't believe that these types of messages come from our own party. Another DINO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. it is getting pretty bad of late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
man4allcats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. I think that both the Republican and Democratic parties have
become an anachronism. The Republicans are and have been for some time publicly committing suicide. The Democrats, with their own well documented propensity for self destruction and with their useless, embarrassing Congress and DINOs like Feinstein and Schumer, are apparently in a race with the ReThugs to see who can get themselves sucked down the toilet first.

If there is any hope at all left for America or the Democratic party, it lies with Dennis Kucinich. Vote for him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. More proof that the "coup" has happened, imho...K&R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. But DiFi serves corporations, not people...
Wouldn’t it be wonderful if our Diane showed the same maternal solicitude for the millions of American citizens whose rights were destroyed?


If she were to do otherwise, her "constituents" would raise holy hell! She understands that the Korporatist Party's definition of the Declaration of Independence has been "corrected" to read "We the corporations of the United States"...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
8. feinstein is a DINO
puke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
9. She is corrupt. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Venus Dog Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
10. Feinstein's career is now over
And her life will never be the same. She has served her master for many years and now the veil has come down. She can no longer hide behind the deception of being the "loyal opposition".

She is just another Lena Brandt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. Feinstein the millionaire
Edited on Sat Nov-10-07 12:14 PM by Don1
She lives in this $16.5 million mansion:
www.counterpunch.org/frank02282006.html

and her husband is a defense contractor making millions from Bush's war while she aids and abets the war vote on various committees and in the Senate.

Conflict of interest?

Anyway, she approved Mukasey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. feinstein, schumer, and lieberman, traitors all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. Kucinich voted FOR two of the articles of impeachment
for the record
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
14. I wish there was some way to take the D from behind her name.
She is a disgrace. Doing everything within her power to advance the whole Bush Doctrine. Traitor.

Heads on pikes!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
15. give me a break! that bitch has been giving blowjobs to corporate
republicans FOR YEARS!
and i'm pretty sure her war contracting husband has been blowing them all too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
16. This is how much her hubby has been raking in since 2000
2000.....$074,688,661

2001.....$077,339,066

2002.....$024,361,837

2003....$113,664,836

2004....$459,405,010

2005....$200,977,056

2006.....$082,838,964

2007.....$037,238,811

Grand Total


$1,070,514,241

That would be OVER ONE BILLION DOLLARS




Is it any wonder why she wants to continue funding the war?

I think everyone should email (of course you will have to find a California address) her censure on Clinton.

If she thinks what Bill did was soooo wrong, then you would think she would feel even worse by what Mad king Boy George and Oil Slick Dick have been doing. Oh wait that would effect her sweet government contracts.

Remember after she flew on Air Force One with Mad king Boy George she was all about the love for him. Perhaps they were working up a scheme to funnel some more $$$$ from the US Treasury.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
17. I was about to say "Thank God she is not
my Senator," and then I remembered that Schumer is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC