Feinstein: Blowjob worse than violating rights of millions: 1999, censure for Clinton. 2007, retroactive immunity for telcos
Submitted by lambert on Fri, 2007-11-09 19:05.
Bush Panopticon Department of You Can't Buff a Turd Diane Feinstein warrantless surveillance
Fresh from subjecting the body politic to cruel and unusual punishment by inflicting pro-torture Judge Mukasey on us at Justice, DiFi wrestles the Constitution to the ground and gratuitously kicks the carcass by attempting to destroy the rule of law entirely.
Yes—and I know this will surprise you—
DiFi’s supporting retroactive immunity for the telcos.With Democrats like this, who needs Republicans?
San Francisco Chronicle:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/11/09/BA13T97BN.DTLSen. Dianne Feinstein said Thursday that she favors legal immunity for telecommunications companies that allegedly shared millions of customers’ telephone and e-mail messages and records with the government, a position that could lead to the dismissal of numerous lawsuits pending in San Francisco.
In a statement at a hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is considering legislation to extend the Bush administration’s electronic surveillance program, Feinstein said the companies should not be “held hostage to costly litigation in what is essentially a complaint about administration activities.”
Wouldn’t it be wonderful if our Diane showed the same maternal solicitude for the millions of American citizens whose rights were destroyed?
Now, back in 1999, DiFi introduced a resolution to censure President Clinton:http://www.cnsnews.com/InDepth/archive/199902/IND19990212c.htmlWhereas William Jefferson Clinton, president of the United States, engaged in an inappropriate relationship with a subordinate employee in the White House, which was shameful, reckless and indefensible;
Whereas William Jefferson Clinton, president of the United States, deliberately misled and deceived the American people, and people in all branches of the United States government;
Whereas William Jefferson Clinton, president of the United States, gave false or misleading testimony and his actions have had the effect of impeding discovery of evidence in judicial
proceedings;
Whereas William Jefferson Clinton’s conduct in this matter is unacceptable for a president of the United States, does demean the office of the president as well as the president himself, and creates disrespect for laws of the land;
Whereas President Clinton fully deserves censure for engaging in such behavior;
Whereas future generations of Americans must know that such behavior is not only unacceptable but also bears grave consequences, including loss of integrity, trust and respect;
Whereas William Jefferson Clinton remains subject to criminal actions in a court of law like any other citizen;
When Clinton gets a blowjob, Diane gets very concerned about the rule of law. But when billion dollar telcos break the law, destroy the rights of millions of Americans, and then demand retroactive immunity? Not so much.
Oh, and the cream of the jest is that
DiFi introduced this resolution after Clinton had already been acquitted. Honestly.
http://www.correntewire.com/feinstein_blowjob_worse_than_violating_rights_of_millions_1999_censure_for_clinton_2007_retroactive_immunity_for_telcos