Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WTF???-20% of soldiers that die in Iraq are not combat related???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 09:39 AM
Original message
WTF???-20% of soldiers that die in Iraq are not combat related???
Who Will Probe 'Noncombat' Deaths in Iraq?
About 20% of the U.S. deaths in Iraq are officially labeled "noncombat," and that number has been surging. This includes accidents, friendly fire and well over 120 suicides. But the government, and the media, seem reluctant to expose the tragedy,
argues vets leader Paul Rieckhoff.

By Greg Mitchell

NEW YORK (November 06, 2007) -- Pretty much alone in the media, E&P for weeks had been charting a troubling increase in non-combat deaths among U.S. troops in Iraq. So it came as no surprise recently when the Pentagon announced that it would probe the perplexing trend. Lt. Gen. Carter Ham, operations director of the Joint Staff, said commanders in Iraq were concerned enough about the spike in non-combat deaths -- from accidents, illness, friendly-fire or suicide -- that it had asked for an assessment by an Army team.

According to Pentagon figures, 29 soldiers lost their lives in August for non-hostile reasons, and another 23 died of non-combat causes in September. Compare that with the average for the first seven months of this year: fewer than nine per month. The spike has coincided with extended 15-month deployments, one senior military official said.

The military officially counts about 20% of the nearly 3900 U.S. fatalities in Iraq as "noncombat." It has officially confirmed 128 suicides in Iraq since 2003, with many others under investigation (and still more taking place on the return home).

more at:
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/columns/pressingissues_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003668890
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Of course they're lying about this!
Non-Combat means less $$ to the families, doesn't it? :shrug:

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. OMG! I didn't know that. So if a soldier who has been sent into
war on behalf of the U.S. is unfortunate enough to die in some way other than combat his family is paid less? What an atrocity!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Non-combat death = $12,420 -- Combat death = $100,000 !!
Edited on Sat Nov-10-07 09:57 AM by Breeze54
Death Gratuity

http://usmilitary.about.com/library/milinfo/casualty/blgratuity.htm

A lump sum gratuitous payment made by the Air Force to eligible beneficiaries of a member who dies
on AD, ADT, or IDT, or full-time National Guard duty. Its purpose is to help the survivors in their
readjustment and to aid them in meeting immediate expenses incurred.

The death gratuity payment is $12,420, and is non-taxable.

For those whose death is as a result of hostile actions and occurred in a designated combat operation
or combat zone or while training for combat or performing hazardous duty, the payment is $100,000.


The death gratuity payment is made to survivors of the deceased in this order:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. That's *exactly* what it means. I found that out from a friend of mine...
Edited on Sat Nov-10-07 09:53 AM by mcscajun
...her close friend's brother was killed in Iraq in a jeep "accident" two years ago, and his death was classified non-combat related, with less benefits to the family as a result.

:grr:

They've been running this war "on the cheap" ONLY where our servicepeople are concerned; before, during, and especially after; everyone else involved is making a bundle!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Thanks for the sad and infuriating info.
:banghead:

This HAS to stop!!

IMPEACH NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. My first thought exactly.
personally I don't care if the guy slipped in the shower and died because he broke his neck -- or if he DID commit suicide. It's GOT to be combat related if it's in a war zone. The whole point of these nitpicky distinctions - which is far from new BTW - is to rip off the family of the dearly departed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Is that true?
Is there a source - I'd love to be able to counter the "war is working" "casualties minimum" folks on another board with the information.

thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. so are the fatality numbers fudged by 20%?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. I don't think so but if a soldier is injured in Iraq and dies in another country
then they are not even included in the total. However, non-combat deaths are included in the official total.


This website shows they do show non-combat deaths: http://icasualties.org/oif/prdDetails.aspx?hndRef=11-2007
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
8. Since when is "Friendly Fire" not considered Combat?
The reason there is "Friendly Fire" going on is because they are in Combat. Sometimes mistakes are made and some of that fire goes astray but that doesn't mean that they weren't engaged in Combat. This is just a way of getting out of paying the Combat Death benefit which I believe has been raised to over a hundred thousand dollars..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
11. How are they giong to siphon Treasury money into their own interests
if they give it away to American families?

Remember, they own the hive and they want as much of the honey as they can get. Damn the drones!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC