NeoCons Pushing GOP to Nominate Lieberman for VP!

Brilliant. May he be as much of an asset to the Repubs as he was to the Dems!


http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/13549.html

Vice President Lieberman?
Posted November 10th, 2007 at 11:30 am

Share This | Spotlight | Permalink

Just eight years after Joe Lieberman was on the Democratic Party’s presidential ticket, a growing number of conservatives have a better idea: put in him on the Republican Party’s presidential ticket.

The Weekly Standard’s William Kristol touted the idea in his column this week. After running a lengthy excerpt of a speech Lieberman recently gave, imploring Democrats to embrace Bush’s vision for combating “Islamist extremism,” Kristol concluded:

Read the whole speech on Lieberman’s website. As for Rudy and John and Fred and Mitt and Mike: Take a break from kissing babies to pick up the phone and congratulate Joe. Seek his endorsement after you win the nomination. What the heck–offer him the vice presidency. (Rudy, you might try State or Defense, since you’ll need a pro-life running mate.)

But McCain-Lieberman, Thompson-Lieberman, Romney-Lieberman, Huckabee-Lieberman — those sound like winning tickets to us. It’s true, given the behavior of the congressional Democrats, the GOP nominee might well win with a more conventional running mate. But why settle for a victory if you can have a realignment?

The idea is, oddly enough, drawing praise in several conservative circles. National Review’s Peter Wehner seems to like Kristol’s suggestion:

At the end of the editorial, Kristol suggests Lieberman for VP again — but this time, to serve as the running mate on a Republican ticket. It’s an intriguing idea — and it would certain scramble the political chessboard. Whichever party wins in ‘08, let’s hope Joe Lieberman plays a pivotal role on national-security matters. In the entire political world, there are not many who are better, or politically braver.

And far-right blogger Mark Noonan went so far as to describe Lieberman as “the ideal candidate for Vice President on the Republican ticket in 2008,” in part because it would demonstrate to the world that “America is united in its quest for victory.”

At the risk of raining on the parade, this seems ridiculously far-fetched. As humiliating as Lieberman is on matters of foreign policy and national security, he’s also fairly liberal on most domestic policy matters, including abortion and gay rights. Is the Republican Party so devoid of leaders that can win a national election that it has to look beyond the GOP for running mates?


...

boot-licking scum for v.p.damn they really want to lose.:scared:

As I said on another thread, he's a jinx, and there with them is right where he belongs.

Funny how everyone's confused about that, huh?

Now THERE'S a dream ticket! :rofl:

he ran for VP twice and LOST BOTH TIMES!

It's gonna be a tough choice for the Repubs next summer...

I can actually see them deciding on Jebbie since they cannot agree on any of the others..

and why not take Joe? That allows a republican governor to replace him, so they pick up a senate seat..

think they couldn't win?? think again

As far-fetched as the idea seems, the possibility of it makes me nervous.

I don't think she's a neocon. But even if she did appoint somebody, it would only be until a special election could be held, right? Or maybe until 2010, the next general election?

I'm not worried about it. It only become a factor if LIEberman has to quit the senate to take the veep slot... and since a Jeb/Joe ticket will make most of the country barf 'till their shoes come out, I don't think that's an issue.

...and a Big Time fuck up!

because thats about how usefull he is to the Democrats.

Assholes!

that might not be a bad idea. Especially if he shows the same loyalty to the Republican pres. candidate as he did to Gore.

he can put another losing notch on his belt!!1

Fuck Joe. :mad:

Lieberman might vote with the Republicans on some issues, but like the article says, his positions on domestic and social issues are liberal, everything the Republicans hate, so I don't think this would go over well with radical conservatives.