Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The New Face of HIV

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 09:44 PM
Original message
The New Face of HIV
Women make up a growing percentage of new cases, so why are so many doctors still treating it like it's only a male disease?

In the United States, HIV used to be known strictly as a gay man's disease. But today, heterosexual women account for more than one quarter of all new U.S. HIV and AIDS diagnoses, up from just 7 percent in 1985. The disease is appearing in women of all ages--from young teens to nursing-home residents--but most often among those of reproductive age. Yet, even as rates climb among women, health advocates say that many doctors still talk about HIV as if it's a male disease. Some fear that infected women, particularly those in monogomous relationships, may not be tested promptly, delaying diagnosis, because health practitioners view them as atypical patients.

"Even when women present with symptoms of HIV, or a history of symptoms or conditions seen in HIV, clinicians won't think to do HIV testing, and women don't ask for it," says Dr. Kathleen Squires, director of infectious diseases and environmental medicine at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital in Philadelphia.

Women who are diagnosed with HIV complain that doctors often don't discuss issues like pregnancy and contraception with them or go through the gender-specific side effects of some drugs. In a new survey of 700 women with HIV, conducted by Roper Public Affairs in collaboration with The Well Project (a nonprofit organization for women affected by HIV), more than half of those surveyed said their health provider never discussed how treatments for the disease affect women differently than men. Only a minority (43 percent) realized that they should discuss plans to have a baby with their doctor well before they got pregnant, to reduce health risks to themselves and their babies.

Dawn Averitt Bridge, an HIV-positive mother and board chairman of The Well Project, says many people, including clinicians, also have outdated notions about HIV and pregnancy. They assume that nothing's changed since the early days when women with HIV were encouraged to get sterilized, out of fear they'd pass on the infection during the birth process. "I have two little girls who are both HIV-negative," says Bridge, who was diagnosed in 1988. "But when I wanted to talk about getting pregnant, my clinician's response was, `Are you trying to give me an ulcer?' There's a lot of bias out there. People assume that you're being irresponsible if you get pregnant when you have HIV. I am astounded how many medical providers still have no idea how successful we are in preventing transmission of the virus to newborns with good planning."

More at link: http://www.newsweek.com/id/70443
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC