Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New AG threatens veto of Leahy surveillance plan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 06:26 AM
Original message
New AG threatens veto of Leahy surveillance plan
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Attorney General Michael Mukasey jumped into the political fray in his first week on the job, telling a key Democratic senator he opposed his electronic surveillance plan and would recommend the president veto it if it is passed.

In a letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vermont, on the eve of crucial committee votes to update the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), Mukasey was adamant in opposing Leahy's plan for changing the law. Mukasey and Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell co-signed the letter released Wednesday night by the Justice Department.

"We strongly oppose the proposed substitute amendment. If the substitute is part of a bill that is presented to the president, we and the president's other senior advisers will recommend that he veto the bill," they said.

Leahy last week introduced his substitute to a FISA modernization bill already approved by the Senate Intelligence Committee.

<snip>

Leahy, who opposed Mukasey's confirmation last week, is adamantly opposed to the immunity provision.


Mukasey and McConnell listed almost a dozen other provisions or omissions in the Leahy plan that they said "would not provide the intelligence community with the tools it needs effectively to collect foreign intelligence information vital for the security of the nation."


<snip>

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/11/14/mukasey.fisa/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Here we go; Mukasey's true colors will start to show. Can't wait
for Schumer's and Feinstein's reactions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. We've already got Feinstein's reaction. She supports
immunity for telecoms and is undoubtedly opposed to other provisions safeguarding civil liberties in Leahy's bill. She's already committed to stabbing us in the back, and to voting against the Leahy bill. Schumer, I suspect, will vote with Leahy and the others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. This is on today's agenda IIRC. Should be interesting - or disappointing. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Why don't we just be honest, and label Feinstein "Lieberman West"...???
Edited on Thu Nov-15-07 07:17 AM by regnaD kciN
God knows she's been pulling the same sort of DLC crap ever since she was lucky enough to have a wingnut councilman get wired on Twinkies and shoot the mayor who was her superior. Even before that, she was a mouthpiece for big business and "developers" in SF, and she spent little time washing Moscone's blood out of the office carpet before making it clear that there was a new sheriff in town, and that their agenda was her agenda. Getting kicked upstairs merely allowed her to combine her loyalty to business interests with an equally-fervid zeal for neo-con "security" matters from unlimited government snooping to pre-emptive war against any place filled with a) Muslims and b) oil.

It amazes me that so many consider her a "leading liberal." I guess they figure that, if you're a woman and a Democrat, that automatically makes you a progressive. If it was David Feinstein, do you think people would have been more ready to recognize "his" DINO leanings?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. i don't want to hear a damn word out of schumer or feinstein's mouths.
they sold us to the wolves. they have absolutely nothing to say, except to hang their heads in shame, that is, if ever they did care about democracy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. I didn't know Attorney General had veto power
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I didn't know that the AG
was a top advisor to the president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. This is exactly..
.... the shit Mukasey said he wouldn't do.

Surprise, surprise, surprise.

Thanks Chuck and Diane, thank a whole fucking lot. I hope you get retired soon, you deserve it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC