Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What do you think the future of the current broadcast system is?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 12:12 PM
Original message
What do you think the future of the current broadcast system is?
Edited on Thu Nov-15-07 12:15 PM by AX10
Does radio have any future in it, or will it be replaced completely by new technologies such as "podcasts" and instant downloading?

How do we effectively harness the power of the Internet to our advantage in both the political and social realms?

Discuss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't know if land-based radio has a big future.
But satellite should be around for a while.

The bigger dinosaur is newspapers, not radio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I agree. Satellite Radio does have a future.
Edited on Thu Nov-15-07 12:20 PM by AX10
Newspapers need to go 100% online or close their doors entirely. Personally, I'd like to see most of them fold up completely, at least on the domestic front. I want to see something for substantive replace the current line-up of newspapers. The Times and the Post are not in the business of hard-hitting journalism. The Wall Street Journal will now be going the same way too, seeing that Murdoch will rape the newsroom and replace it with pro-establishment propagandists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I think it would be tremendously bad if most of them folded completely...
since newspapers and magazines do most of the investigatory work in American journalism.

As for them going 100-percent online, the problem with that, of course, is the lack of substantial ad revenue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Newspapers within the international community v. domestic.
I am not impressed with many of our domestic rags. The NY Times is an example of a bad paper, they have a few liberal writers to give the illusion of it being a "liberal" paper, but still cow-tow to the right wing and smear the Democratic party quite often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I'm not talking right or left. I'm talking investigations.
Name any single solitary transgression of the Bush administration. In almost every case, we know about it because of the work of print journalists (and, usually, American print journalists), whether its warrantless wiretapping (NY Times), Abu Ghraib (Seymour Hersh), Extraordinary renditions (The WaPo), and so on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. On-line they could charge a subscription fee and advertisers...
could advertise based upon "web hits".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Web revenue doesn't come close to touching paid advertising revenue in print form...
and subscription fees for online content are useless, given the fact that subscription-based content can, after viewing, be copied and pasted and disseminated for free by thousands of secondary vendors -- witness the total failure of the NY Times' short-lived "NYTimes Select."

I don't disagree that online is the future of newspapers. But I don't think that we've yet figured out how to make it economically viable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red Zelda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Me too.
Newspapers have cut their own throats primarily by being full of stupid fluff.
Then they go online and fill their Web pages with ... stupid fluff.
There are so many brain-dead asshats running newspapers now that the industry is doomed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Land based media will still be there for emergencies
The internet and sattelite communications are the future of all media, and democracy.

It's how we will, and are beating, Ailes and Murdoch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. The next big speed bump in the internet
and fiber in the living room, and high speed wireless everywhere, will render 'broadcast media' as archaic as print media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1gobluedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I hope it takes awhile
Since I work in radio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. people still want live media content in their cars and homes
it just isn't going to be delivered exclusively by the traditional broadcast media, and the stranglehold the broadcast conglomerates have on content and delivery is going to go away, at least for a while. That is already happening with satellite radio. Internet into your car is only a matter of time.

You should still have a job in something that resembles radio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. I don't know much about the radio scene in the States
I have been stationed in Europe for years now, and radio is still
very much alive and well here. Back home in the Dallas area, with
the long distances by car and the increasing traffic, I am thankful
for the radio (KERA, the NPR station, is pretty good, and it's all
I lesten to when I'm back home--which is all of 40 days a year, if
that, so it's of no great import.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC