Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CBS Files To Dismiss Rather's "Bizarre Allegations"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 05:03 PM
Original message
CBS Files To Dismiss Rather's "Bizarre Allegations"
Today, in New York Supreme Court, in response to Dan Rather's civil lawsuit, CBS filed a lengthy 30-page motion to dismiss the case.

CBS executives also released a statement today, noting that they are "mystified" by Rather's "bizarre allegations" but will "vigorously" defend themselves in court if need be.

"Dan Rather is one of the most important figures in the history of broadcast journalism, and for more than 40 years was one of our most valued colleagues," CBS said in the statement. "That is why we at CBS are mystified and saddened by the baseless and self-serving allegations and distortions of fact raised in his lawsuit."

"Today we are filing a motion to dismiss," added the statement. "If we are required to proceed beyond this point, we will defend the case vigorously and demonstrate that the lawsuit is wholly without merit, and that the bizarre allegations by Mr. Rather are untrue."

UPDATE: In the motion, CBS lawyers argue that Mr. Rather's lawsuit is a "thinly-disguised" defamation suit and therefore is time-barred because of a one-year statute of limitations. To wit: They point out that the last "allegedly wrongful act" took place on June, 16 2006, and that Mr. Rather did not file suit until September 19, 2007, roughly 15 months later.

Furthermore, CBS lawyers argue that Mr. Rather's actions are motivated not by any wrongful actions on the part of the defendants but, instead, by Mr. Rather's desire to stay in the limelight.

"This lawsuit is a regrettable attempt by plaintiff Dan Rather to remain in the public eye, and to settle old scores and perceived slights, based on an array of far-fetched allegations," the lawyers write.

http://www.observer.com/2007/cbs-mystified-dan-rathers-bizarre-allegations-files-motion-dismiss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. They are disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ever since I saw "The Insider" with my man Al Pacino.......sigh.....
and saw the machinations and thuggery of corporate CBS, I would have a problem believing anything they would come forward with in rebuttal. Dan doesn't need the "limelight"... I think he's a pretty secure guy, and has a nice little gig right now. Payback's a b**ch, and yes, Dan is saying CBS committed wrongful actions. Sue their a$$es off!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. CBS (aka the Katie Couric network) has become irrelevant...
...Dan Rather, on the other hand, is a LEGEND!

Murrow and Cronkite's network has become the joke of the industry, and they're too self-absorbed and stupid to realize it.

Dan will get the last laugh - mark my words!:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. I sure agree with you!
CBS has consistently had the best news division in history. Dan Rather is "a real journalist," to quote Greg Palast, while Katie Couric is nothing but a lawn gnome, a decoration, and not even a cute one at that...:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. They had to use "bizzare" because Fox got a lock on "ridiculous"
in connection with the Kerik sex thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. I sincerely hope Rather's attorneys have their ducks in a row.
I don't believe Rather really cares about actually 'winning' this lawsuit as much as revealing the operations of CBS. THAT would be enough to put out to the public.

Please, judge, at least allow this case to proceed through full discovery. It's a worthy case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. Viacom's Belittling of Rather Begins
Dan Rather is the crazy one - Sumner Redstone perfectly sane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. Go Dan Rather.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. That statute of limitations thing
might be a real problem for Dan. I wonder why he waited so long?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC