Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conyers:Terrorist Surveillance Without Compromising Personal Liberties

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-18-07 04:04 PM
Original message
Conyers:Terrorist Surveillance Without Compromising Personal Liberties
Late Thursday night, the House passed the RESTORE Act, a bill that addresses the issue of warrantless surveillance and resolves outstanding issues that resulted from the stopgap measure passed in August.

We have drafted a law that will allow us to provide for the safety our citizens without asking them the sacrifice their personal rights and liberties. In rewriting this summer's Protect America Act, we reaffirmed and strengthened the role of the FISA courts ensuring that court approval must be sought for conducting this type of surveillance.

Our bill also did not provide any retroactive immunity for telecommunications carriers. The administration had asked us to provide blanket immunity for the phone companies participating in the warrantless surveillance program, yet there is no way we could even consider this request without an understanding of the full scope of the program. How can we be expected to approve of their conduct when we don't know what their conduct was?

For this reason, we requested the underlying documentation that would reveal to the Committee the nature and extent of the telephone companies' participation in this program. The administration has refused to provide us these documents for the past ten months and we had no choice but dismiss their request for immunity.

Nonetheless, the bill we passed this week provides all the tools needed by the government to fight terrorism and we are pleased that the Senate is moving in our same direction on this legislation.

http://johnconyers.com/node/173
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-18-07 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. when is Conyers gonna start enforcing his own subpoenas?????? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-18-07 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Right. when is Conyers gonna start enforcing his own subpoenas?????? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC