Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

June '06: Iraqi Army Will Be 'Built' By End of Year -- Nov '07: not ready yet

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 10:37 AM
Original message
June '06: Iraqi Army Will Be 'Built' By End of Year -- Nov '07: not ready yet
June 2006

http://www.voanews.com/english/archive/2006-06/2006-06-27-voa84.cfm?CFID=239660925&CFTOKEN=11904307

The U.S. Army general in charge of training Iraq's new security forces says the new Iraqi army will be fully in place by the end of the year, but it will need additional time to become fully capable. The general spoke Tuesday at the Pentagon..

Lieutenant General Martin Dempsey says the effort is on track to finish building Iraq's new army by the end of this year.

"The Iraqi army will be built by the end of this calendar year," said General Dempsey. "All of the pieces and parts and processes will be in place by the end of calendar year '06. Iraqis will be fully capable of recruiting, vetting, inducting, training, forming into units, putting them in barracks, sending them out the gate to perform their missions."


November 2007

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L26463623.htm

Iraq forces better but not ready yet-US general

BAGHDAD, Nov 26 (Reuters) - Iraq's security forces are improving but will not be ready to take control of as many provinces by the end of the year as the U.S. military had hoped, a top U.S. general said.

Iraq has experienced a rare lull in violence in the past few months, allowing U.S. forces to plan and begin a gradual drawdown of troops that will see 20,000 leave Iraq by July 2008.

The speed of withdrawals has been tied to improvements in Iraq's security forces, which Lieutenant-General James Dubik, the U.S. general in charge of training the nation's soldiers, described as good but mixed.

His predecessor, Lieutenant-General Martin Dempsey, had said in June that Iraqi forces should be ready to be in control of 14 of Iraq's 18 provinces by the end of the year.

"I don't think we'll make that," Dubik told Reuters in an interview late on Sunday.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. How long are the Iraqi soldiers enlisted for?
It seems many will retire before they are trained.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trouser Trout Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. Nov 2008: Getting there, not quite ready. Nov 2009; getting closer
almost ready to turn over everything to Iraqis. Nov 2010; huge upsurge in violence. 200,000 more US troops needed to get back to 2004 stability.

Get the picture?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. Are you rememberin' stuff again?
His imperial majesty, George Dubya, has warned you libruls and America haters about that. Besides, the Iraq Army would have been ready to take over, but there are some parts on back order. And then some old friends from out of town dropped in unexpectedly. Oh, and the baby got the croup. Did we mention the flat tire?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC