Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gov.Ed Rendell of Pennsylvania Puts Gun Divide to the Test: Will Force a Public Reckoning.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 08:11 PM
Original message
Gov.Ed Rendell of Pennsylvania Puts Gun Divide to the Test: Will Force a Public Reckoning.
Edited on Mon Nov-26-07 08:11 PM by billbuckhead
Ed Rendell of Pennsylvania Puts Gun Divide to the Test: Will Force a Public Reckoning.

"Because of the perceived clout of the mythical gun lobby – and we emphasize the word “perceived,” not actual – gun control legislation in most state houses is shot down faster than a pheasant at a “canned” hunt.

What it takes to advance public safety is leadership and an engaged citizenry. Both those forces are coming together in Pennsylvania, even though the state, until recently, had the highest number of National Rifle Association members.

So our hat goes off to Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell this week for getting mad as all heck about the bloodshed in his state, particularly in Philadelphia, caused by guns.

As quoted in the Philadelphia Inquirer, Rendell pleaded: "How much will it take? What does the toll have to be before we do anything?" Rendell said during a news conference. He noted that two more Philadelphia police officers had been wounded by gunmen since Nov. 9, the date he proposed a mandatory 20-year sentence for shooting at a police officer. "We have a problem," Rendell said, pausing. "Houston, we have a problem.""
------------snip-----------------------------
<http://www.gunguys.com/>

First crack in PA's wall of unreason
Posted by Bryan Miller November 26, 2007 9:35AM
Categories: Hot Topics, Law & Order

"In unprecedentedted move, Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell addressed the Judiciary Committee of the state House of Representatives last Tuesday morning. The governor called for the committee to favorably report to the House floor three bills intended to place barriers to the rampant illegal trade in handguns in Pennsylvania- HB 22, to limit handgun buyers to the purchase of no more than a single handgun in any 30-day period (up to 13 per year); HB 29, to require gun owners to report lost or stolen guns; and HB 18, to allow municipalities to set their own gun regulations.

The illegal gun trade, which moves handguns from legal sale at Pennsylvania gun shops to illegal street sale, fuels gun crime and violence in the Keystone State and throughout the Northeast US (and especially, according to recently published ATF data, in New Jersey).

Rendell did not succeed on Tuesday, but, for the first time in memory, the mountain (and I don't mean Rendell himself) moved. Namely, a bill of exceeding common sense (HB 29), that would simply require the reporting of lost or stolen guns to police, was tabled for future consideration. HB 29 had been defeated by the same committee just six months previously.

Legislation is generally tabled when it makes legislators so uncomfortable that they don't wish to have their votes recorded. Such discomfort in Pennsylvania on gun bills is new and refreshing. In past, legislators felt no hesitation about voting down any bill that had the merest hint of National Rifle Association opposition. Not so now with HB 29, violently opposed by the leadership of the NRA and its ilk. Although hardly a major victory for reasonableness and safety, Tuesday was an important start in a state long viewed as totally dominated by the gun lobby.

The wall of reaction and unreason, built by legislators' fear of the gun lobby, has suffered its first crack. This is important and encouraging news for New Jerseyans, whose communities suffer from the interstate trafficking of handguns, which Pennsylvania's lax handgun laws encourage. Per recent Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms data, only about a quarter of guns recovered from crime in New Jersey during '06 and traced back to their original source were originally purchased in our state. Fully three-quarters of recovered and traced crime guns were originally purchased elsewhere and brought here. Pennsylvania is the leading external source of guns used in New Jersey crimes."
-------------snip-----------------------
<http://blog.nj.com/njv_bryan_miller/2007/11/first_crack_in_pas_wall_of_unr.html>

Lets make Reichwing legistlators pledge their allegiance to the gun lobby in public. Three cheers to a fearless Democrat who has beat the NRA several times and would make a hell of a good VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blue neen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm with you.
I also think he would make a hell of a good VP.

Congrats to Rendell. It takes a lot of gumption to take on the NRA in Pennsylvania.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Edwards/Rendell
Pretty good ticket!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue neen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. It would be a great ticket!
I could definitely live with that. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. I could throw my support behind HB 29...
...but laws that punish law-abiding gun owners for simply being law-abiding? I'm not buying it.

And then there's Bob Casey, the junior Senator from PA, who is pro-RKBA last time I checked.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Casey got less votes than Rendell
and the NRA has tried hard to beat Rendell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Casey and Rendell weren't running against each other
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC