Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lerk's suggestion of incidental land use

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 05:16 PM
Original message
Lerk's suggestion of incidental land use
take unused stretches along highways, (you know that space that mowers and bushhogs constantly have to go over) and allow the poor to plant and harvest crops there, with some help from local agriculture experts.
Additionally, on all public land, only plant trees and plants that bear edible fruit, instead of ornamental trees and flowers. Allow the poor to help in gathering, canning, distributing, etc. in return for part of the bounty.

Or if Bush is hellbent to have faith initiatives, have churches make pies and breads and other staples from all the harvests on incidental unused land to feed the homeless and poor.

If even only the medians on city streets were planted with blackberry bushes, there would be a large enough readily available sustenance for homeless at least for part of the year.

there is a great deal of incidental land doing nothing except being mowed all over the US, and it would cost very little to plant things that bear fruit or grain.

Even if it was haphazard farming, whatever it yielded would be more than places have now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. the 'iron law of olligarcy' ..the rich will have the poor work'n on it and yhen selling it to them
at a premium

welfare slavery for profit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think the problem is lack of food or arable land.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. agreed. I'm only suggesting a way around the gridlock of haves and havenots
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. In Biblical times, landowners were required to leave part of their harvest in
the fields for the poor to pick up as "gleaners."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC