|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 03:39 PM Original message |
Rasmussen: Tie in Iowa,... Edwards tops list of 2nd Choices ....LINK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
1. so that means caucuses have a kind of instant voting rule when your #1 choice is below 15%? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 03:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. The 15% drop dead requirement takes those candidates out of the running and... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
book_worm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
2. I think that second choice thing is what will carry Edwards to victory in Iowa. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 04:06 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Edwards' people have been through the Iowa Caucus Experience before... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
3. The question is, where do those second choices come from? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 04:01 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. That's right! It is the caucus voters of those gaining less than 15% in the first round... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
7. I've been speculating this thing lays out well for Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
8. Rasmussen Was Very Accurate in 2006 Mid-Terms... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
9. Who's feeling it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 04:17 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. I'm with you nutmegger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 06:27 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. The Tradewinds Seem to Be Blowing His Way (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
11. The slow boil in the latest polls show John Edwards closing in once again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 04:33 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. And Some New Campaign Cash... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
13. The WIN in IOWA this time will carry much more MOMENTUM than years past because... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigdarryl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
15. the media has counted Edwards out for MONTHS damn Hillary 3rd for.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mayberry Machiavelli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
16. This is looking like a dead heat. Good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-30-07 08:49 AM Response to Original message |
17. Being Mentioned in the GOP Debate Shows They're Scared of Edwards ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:59 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC