Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rasmussen: Tie in Iowa,... Edwards tops list of 2nd Choices ....LINK

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 03:39 PM
Original message
Rasmussen: Tie in Iowa,... Edwards tops list of 2nd Choices ....LINK
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_2008__1/2008_presidential_election/iowa/democratic_iowa_caucus

Rasmussen: Clinton, Edwards, and Obama Tied in Iowa

"The latest Rasmussen Reports poll of the Iowa Democratic Caucus for 2008 find Hillary Clinton at 27%, Barack Obama at 25%, and John Edwards at 24%. Bill Richardson is the only other Democrat in double-digits at 10% while Joe Biden earns 4% of the vote from Likely Caucus Participants.
These results reflect little change from a Rasmussen Reports survey conducted earlier in the month. In the previous survey Clinton had 29% support with Edwards at 25% and Obama at 24%."

<snip>

"Currently, in Iowa, Clinton attracts 30% of the vote from women while Obama earns 26% and Edwards 22%. Among men, it’s Edwards 26%, Clinton 24%, and Obama 23% (see crosstabs)."

"In terms of second-choices in Iowa, John Edwards tops the list of candidates. He is the second choice for 28% of likely caucus participants. Obama is the second choice for 18%, Clinton for 16%, and Richardson for 15%. Second choice preferences are especially important given the nature of the Iowa caucuses. In a particular caucus setting, if a candidate receives less than 15% of the vote, their supporters will be re-allocated to other candidates."

MORE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. so that means caucuses have a kind of instant voting rule when your #1 choice is below 15%? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. The 15% drop dead requirement takes those candidates out of the running and...
the caucus voters who originally voted for that candidate can no longer vote for that candidate in the next round, nor for any other candidate who did not reach the 15% requirement. So they are forced to vote for another candidate that did reach the 15% requirement or not vote at all.

Being second choice is critical when the polls are this close heading into the caucuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think that second choice thing is what will carry Edwards to victory in Iowa.
and why Hillary is likely to lose since she is running third in that category--while only in a statistical dead-heat for first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Edwards' people have been through the Iowa Caucus Experience before...
... and they know exactly how it will work. Combine that with years of planning, organizing, and establishing a ground operation in Iowa that has been characterized as 'the class of the field.'

Edwards is just now starting his tv/media advertising in Iowa, so people there are unlikely to tired of Edwards' ads compared to the continuous advertising that HRC and BO did in spending almost $9 mil between them over the past several months.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. The question is, where do those second choices come from?
If Obama supporters would choose Edwards as their second choice, it doesnt matter. WHat matters most is who has the Richardson, Biden, Kucinich, and Dodd supporters, because they most likely will not get above the 15 percent mark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. That's right! It is the caucus voters of those gaining less than 15% in the first round...
The plum supporters in this group would those who vote for Richardson first round if he gets less than 15%, as he is likely to have the most support at the caucuses other than JRE, BO or HRC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. I've been speculating this thing lays out well for Edwards
when the supporters of those candidates who have less than 15% have to line up behind someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. Rasmussen Was Very Accurate in 2006 Mid-Terms...
... and the Iowa caucus rules must have the Clinton campaign reaching out hard to Biden, Dodd, and maybe even Richardson (with promises of what, one can only surmise).

- Dave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. Who's feeling it?
I am!

Edwards 2008!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I'm with you nutmegger
I'm really beginning to believe he can beat the Hillary juggernaut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. The Tradewinds Seem to Be Blowing His Way (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. The slow boil in the latest polls show John Edwards closing in once again.
Edwards may have the last laugh in Iowa. If he does, he will roll into New Hampshire with a lot of credibility with voters there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. And Some New Campaign Cash...
... as many who've remained on the sidelines decide how to target their giving.

- Dave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
13. The WIN in IOWA this time will carry much more MOMENTUM than years past because...
... there will be only 5 days until the New Hampshire Primary.

Not much time to rehabilitate a 'bad showing' in Iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
15. the media has counted Edwards out for MONTHS damn Hillary 3rd for....
second choice thats brutal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. This is looking like a dead heat. Good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
17. Being Mentioned in the GOP Debate Shows They're Scared of Edwards ...
... in the Romney campaign.

- Dave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC