Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Two Term President Shown Whose Boss by a Freshmen Senator who threatens to "show him the way"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 12:12 AM
Original message
A Two Term President Shown Whose Boss by a Freshmen Senator who threatens to "show him the way"
Was this last line of Webb's speech a hint that Bush needs to cooperate or he'll be impeached?

"Tonight we are calling on this president to take similar action, in both areas. If he does, we will join him. If he does not, we will be showing him the way."

My take on this is that it is a clear message to Bush: Withdraw from Iraq or face Impeachment.

If it wasn't intended to send that message, the wording would have been as such: "If he does, we will join him. If he does not, we will show him the way."

There is a slight difference, but significant. The phrase 'showing him the way' implies we will direct him to leave, while the phrase 'show him the way' would have implied a lead-by-example approach.

Remember, Webb is a writer. He would be fully aware of the difference in language between these two phrases. I bet that statement has analysts heads spinning tonight...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think it is purposefully ambiguous, which is great. I MUCH prefer this to:
"Impeachment is off the table" and the like.

Whether or not you intend to do it, why telegraph intentions unless it is absolutely necessary?

Why not keep all options open, let implicit threats stay implicit unless it is absolutely necessary to remove ambiguity?

I like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blonndee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. I liked the phrasing but it seems to me
not likely about impeachment, but something along the lines of "We're the ones who are really in charge now." I thought it was great. It really highlighted the Democrats' strength and determination and pointed out Chimpy's lame-duckiness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. As soon as he said it,
I told the TV (I spoke to the TV throughout the evening, yelling at times), "Show him THE DOOR. You mean show him the door!"

He couldn't have said it that way, though. It is too early for that.

The time may come for that. They would have to lay the groundwork first.

It was okay for me to yell at the TV. My husband excused himself. He simply cannot stand to see or hear * any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beltanefauve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Show him the door
was my first response, too!:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 03:12 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I also said "out the door" at our tv viewing too!
Edited on Wed Jan-24-07 03:15 AM by calipendence
I think that ambiguity was intentional! And I don't think he was necessarily celebrating Peter Frampton's song either!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. I am so happy to have this person of quality on our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clinton_Co_Regulator Donating Member (194 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. K+R
:kick:

I think you are absolutely correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
6. And Webb beat someone who was considered a shoe-in...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
7. you're making too much of it
the way he said it has a sort of emphasis by understatement - its just a creative style

that said, i believe Jim Webb means business, and WILL be "showing him the way" and that there is NOTHING "off the table"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
9. K&R #5
made it #5 so it's on the greatest thread.. I rather agree with the wording being ambiguous but threatening enough to make them nervous...



www.cafepress.com/warisprofitable <<-- antibush prodem stickers/shirts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corkhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
11. I hadn't put my finger on it but that phrase struck a chord with me that I don't think would have
had he used "show" instead of "showing". I hadn't consciously recognized it; excellent observation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
12. A lot like Newt talking about Clinton after his SOU address
Something about a train and if he didn't get on board he would be run over because the train was coming through..Also called Clinton irrelevent...:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 08:45 AM
Original message
Ooops!
I think Newt might have gotten that prediction wrong! At least that's what i think! LOL! Geez, Newt got run over by Clinton & run out of town by his own party. And, he's relevant?
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Dupe
Edited on Wed Jan-24-07 08:45 AM by ProfessorGAC
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC