|
Ever notice some people post NOTHING but rants about how one of the other candidates besides their own just stink? That they jump into any positive thread about the other candidates just as an excuse to bash away? Like there's nothing else going on in the world that requires their attention other than the 2008 Presidential race? Like they're sports fanatics totally mesmerized by their own team's chances of winning the World Series or the Superbowl?
I picked my candidate several months ago, and, yes, I've posted a few rants critical of Hillary Clinton, who, in my opinion, is the worst possible choice at this juncture for a variety of reasons. I've also posted positive threads about MY chosen candidate. But I don't spend my time here hunting around for anything positive about her and dragging my soapbox around so I can attack her or her supporters.
No. I have other fish to fry. My primary issue is the trickle-down Class War being fought against the middle class and working poor in this country, and it's this issue that has drawn me to my chosen candidate. Because nothing should frighten the powers-that-be more than having the nature of their game revealed to the American People.
Which is why one certain candidate has gained an almost overwhelming amount of corporate support, and a minimal amount of support and financing from labor organizations.
But that's neither here nor there.
While we're bare-knuckle brawling here, the REAL enemy, the parasites intent on sucking all the life out of not only us, but the whole world, are laughing all the way to the bank, the five-star restaurant, the high-end tailor, and the skiing vacation in the Alps.
The way I see it, we have a fine kettle of candidates. Any one of them is a better choice than any Republican. That's even considering Hillary's connection to corporate interests, Obama's faith that all the Right Wing needs is a conciliatory executive who can reach across both sides of the aisle, John Edwards's 400 dollar haircut, sprawling mansion, and mistaken votes on the Iraq war and the Bankruptcy bill, Joe Biden's off-the-cuff remarks and distressing sponsorship of the Rave Act, and Dennis Kucinich's belief in flying saucers and half-hearted campaign tactics.
We've dug deep to find each candidates weaknesses from our perspective, dragging a thousand arguments into the light of day to pick over like vultures ripping flesh from the carcass of a deer. All of them have glaring weaknesses, depending on our point of view.
Of course, the Republican strategy has been to attack the candidate's strengths. So what strengths can we find in each candidate that might be turned against them in the general? Clinton's strength is her familiarity with the whole process, and the job itself. Obama's strength is his willingness to compromise. Edwards strength is his apparent new-found dedication to populism. Biden's strength is his no-frills, plain speech. And Kucinich's strength is his strong convictions.
Again, this is a matter of perspective.
I know we're not going to have a truce until the primaries are over. Clinton supporters will be attacking Obama supporters and Edwards supporters. Obama supporters will be attacking Clinton people and, sometimes, even Edwards people. Edwards people will be attacking Clinton supporters and, occasionally, Obama people.
It's a three-way horse-race at this point and we're getting more antsy by the day.
But there are issues other than the Presidential race. My challenge to all the fanatics focusing on defending or promoting their candidate of choice is to spend a little time considering and posting about something besides the race. What are the issues that brought you to that candidate in the first place? Why not focus on those for a little while without bringing the candidate into it? Let's hear your own point of view on something that matters to YOU.
If nothing else, it would be a welcome break from sowing discord.
Or so it seems to me.
|