Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US finds no Iran bomb program: Nuclear effort ended in 2003, report says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 06:06 AM
Original message
US finds no Iran bomb program: Nuclear effort ended in 2003, report says
Please recommend this post..It's like REALLY important:

link:
http://www.boston.com/news/world/articles/2007/12/04/us_finds_no_iran_bomb_program/

US finds no Iran bomb program
Nuclear effort ended in 2003, report says

By Bryan Bender and Farah Stockman

Globe Staff / December 4, 2007

"WASHINGTON - Iran halted its nuclear weapons program four years ago and there is no evidence it has enriched uranium to build an atomic bomb, according to declassified portions of a secret US intelligence assessment released yesterday - directly contradicting the Bush administration's portrayal of Iran as a terrorist state bent on developing an atomic arsenal.

The much-anticipated National Intelligence Estimate on Iran's nuclear program, ordered by Congress in 2006, concludes that Tehran's decision to halt its nuclear weapons program "suggests it is less determined to develop nuclear weapons than we have been judging since 2005." The Iranian government's decisions, according to the report, "are guided by a cost-benefit approach" rather than a rush to obtain a nuclear weapon "irrespective of the political, economic, and military costs."

The report - considered the collective judgment of the nation's 16 spy agencies - estimated the earliest Iran could produce a bomb is 2010 if it resumed its weapons program, but it is more likely that the ability to make a nuclear weapon "may not be attained until after 2015."

The conclusions contrasted sharply with recent statements of President Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and many of the top Republican presidential candidates. Most seem to regard Iran as a nation that wants a nuclear arsenal despite the cost - including a potential military confrontation with the United States."

http://www.boston.com/news/world/articles/2007/12/04/us_finds_no_iran_bomb_program/

another excellent article from the NYT:



An Assessment Jars a Foreign Policy Debate About Iran


link:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/04/washington/04assess.html?ex=1354424400&en=1ca323f6a311fcec&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss

"WASHINGTON, Dec. 3 — Rarely, if ever, has a single intelligence report so completely, so suddenly, and so surprisingly altered a foreign policy debate here.

A satellite image of the Natanz nuclear complex in Iran, taken this year, after military production had stopped.



An administration that had cited Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons as the rationale for an aggressive foreign policy — as an attempt to head off World War III, as President Bush himself put it only weeks ago — now has in its hands a classified document that undercuts much of the foundation for that approach.

The impact of the National Intelligence Estimate’s conclusion — that Iran had halted a military program in 2003, though it continues to enrich uranium, ostensibly for peaceful uses — will be felt in endless ways at home and abroad.

It will certainly weaken international support for tougher sanctions against Iran, as a senior administration official grudgingly acknowledged. And it will raise questions, again, about the integrity of America’s beleaguered intelligence agencies, including whether what are now acknowledged to have been overstatements about Iran’s intentions in a 2005 assessment reflected poor tradecraft or political pressure.

Seldom do those agencies vindicate irascible foreign leaders like President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, who several weeks ago said there was “no evidence” that Iran was building a nuclear weapon, dismissing the American claims as exaggerated.

link:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/04/washington/04assess.html?ex=1354424400&en=1ca323f6a311fcec&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss

.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Darn! We were supposed to invade before this got out.
Then we could make something else up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost Dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. Note ref. to "integrity of America’s beleaguered intelligence agencies"
as if there is no such thing as manipulation, stovepiping, and nobody is pressuring nobody around here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Sssssshhhhhh
The sheeple aren't supposed to know about the Office of Special Plans and the Downing Street memo. Besides, the Revolutionary Guard is a terrorist organization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC