Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Key Guantánamo cases hit Supreme Court today

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 07:20 AM
Original message
Key Guantánamo cases hit Supreme Court today
Key Guantánamo cases hit Supreme Court
The high court hears two cases Wednesday that challenge the basic US terms of detention at the prison camp.
By Warren Richey | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

from the December 5, 2007 edition

Reporter Warren Richey discusses two potential landmark cases before the US Supreme Court involving America's treatment of Guantánamo detainees.


WASHINGTON - Habeas corpus – the right to test the legality of one's detention before a neutral judge – is widely recognized as a cornerstone of government rule by law and the most basic guarantee of individual freedom. The Founding Fathers deemed it so fundamental that they wrote it into the body of the Constitution itself.

But does that core freedom extend overseas to America's enemies in the war on terror?

On Wednesday, the US Supreme Court takes up two potential landmark cases examining the legality of America's treatment of terror suspects at the Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, prison camp.

The stakes are enormously high, not just for the detainees but for the Bush administration as well. If constitutional and other legal rights extend to the 305 enemy combatants currently being detained at the naval base, administration officials, military officers, interrogators, and others could be forced by federal judges to appear in open court to reveal every detail of how detainees were captured and treated – including harsh interrogation methods and alleged torture. If the administration refuses to comply, the remedy under habeas corpus is immediate release from custody.

more...

http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/1205/p01s02-usju.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yep.
Everyone who cares about democracy and freedom needs to keep an eye on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. How the SC votes will tell us a lot and I'm not optimistic.
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Me either, but the NIE and their ongoing complicance with Dicky 'n Jorge
isn't making them look good right now.

People are pissed off and they're going to be some lashing out.

There's a slim chance a ruling and guidelines to begin releasing hostages would give the maladministration an out of sorts.

Morning Babs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Keep the faith.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Thanks for those links, mmonk, and your optimism! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. You can read the transcript of the oral arguments later today - link included
Oral arguments are posted on line on the same day that the Court hears the case if you wish to read them. Sometimes its interesting.

http://www.supremecourtus.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. There must be a lot of interest because I heard on Washington Journal
that they will be releasing audio as well. Maybe CSPAN will link to it at their site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I'm hoping there's a link direct from the gov't..
I'm poking around.. looking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. CSPAN-3 is covering it per Wash. Journal and their schedule,
11:15am EST.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. YES! CSPAN-3 @ 11:15AM EST...
http://inside.c-spanarchives.org:8080/cspan/schedule.csp

Judicial Proceeding
U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. Supreme Court
Washington, District of Columbia (United States)
ID: 202767 - 12/05/2007 - 1:00 - No Sale


Oral arguments on Boumediene v. Bush and Al Odah v. U.S.

CPAN-3
11:15 AM EST
1:00 (est.) LIVE
Judicial Proceeding
U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. Supreme Court
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. Thanks
from all who aren't going to be able to follow live.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
10. Kick for the most important cases in a hundred years.
Edited on Wed Dec-05-07 08:29 AM by mmonk
This will determine how difficult a task it will be to restore constitutional representative government.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
11. K&R for the start of the return of my country - nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
12. Even the Supreme Court we have now has favored the Constitution
so far - so I am hopeful - of course, as usual, the MSM will spin it as Bush's "defeat" in the "War on Terror."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
14. KICK! Important! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
15. CSPAN-3, should be starting. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC