|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 08:13 PM Original message |
Jonathan Turley on Olbermann: "The idea that the President is not involved is ridiculous" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 08:15 PM Response to Original message |
1. How many years of this crap must we endure? It's exhausting, I tell ya! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 10:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
20. Video HERE: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 10:11 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Correct quote is: "The Suggestion the President is not Involved is Ridiculous" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 08:15 PM Response to Original message |
2. No one could ever convince me that Bush wasn't involved |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thepurpose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
3. Since there is an ongoing investigation. I can't comment on this post.Hee Hee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
4. Nominated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 08:17 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. One smart guy. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 08:52 AM Response to Reply #5 |
28. He was the only scholar to testify for impeaching Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogmarch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
6. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Postman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
7. These past 8 years have been surreal to say the least. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thepurpose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 08:28 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. Since there is an ongoing investigation. I can't comment on this post. However we will leak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Postman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 08:31 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. I'm not getting it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thepurpose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 08:37 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. If I was in the WH press briefing room that is the same question I would pose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 08:47 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Poster is mocking Dana Perino and her arbitrary inability-to-comment defense and her ignorance of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 08:54 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. The freepers and sub-freepers always get around admitting wrong-doing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
8. And this is why we need a 'fighter' from outside the Washington beltway LIKE EDWARDS.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Manifestor_of_Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
9. Turley said 6 to 12 crimes, on Randi's show today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
10. I love Turley, too bad his segment wasn't longer so we could have avoided Milbank. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 08:26 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Bushed!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Olney Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
13. Turley consistently delivers a scholarly indictment of the Chimp's assault on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 12:20 AM Response to Reply #13 |
25. Turley and John Dean: a great one-two punch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Olney Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 07:50 AM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 08:38 PM Response to Original message |
16. Kick AND Recommend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
17. Considering the track record of this administration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-10-07 10:12 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. "We mustn't investigate." Where/when have I heard those words before? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
23. Write and call your Senators and ask them to support Biden's asking for a special investigation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 12:16 AM Response to Original message |
24. SIX PEOPLE need Attorneys |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 12:37 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Add a few more co-conspirators, maybe Ashcroft and Gonzales |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
29. "The Dems may have known" but couldn't tell because of national security oaths... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-11-07 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
30. The Dems-may-have-known revelation isn't a revelation at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 07:02 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC