Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Waterboarding legal?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Prefer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 05:35 PM
Original message
Is Waterboarding legal?
Would it be within the legal power of anyone but the CIA to Waterboard?

Clearly it is not torture, by the new legal definition provided by President Bush, so there must not be anything wrong with it. So does that mean the police could do it? If they can conduct a full body cavity search, you would think Waterboarding would be less intrusive than that. Could it even be to where hired security guards like at Walmart could waterboard?

I think the current events have set a confusing precedent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R & Welcome!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. The president does not decide what's legal.
Edited on Tue Dec-11-07 05:37 PM by BuyingThyme
And welcome to DU!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. No, Sir, It Is Not Legal
The 'opinions' produced by legal sycophants within the administration have no more validity than the reports prepared by Enron's accountants....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. No, It's Not
It is a crime by international treaty, and no amount of signing statements or special legislation can get around it. Such efforts only make Congress complicit in crimes against humanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Welcome to DU
and if the trials that convicted the Japanese secret police of war crimes are any indication, waterboarding has been illegal for the past 62 years, since that was one of the main interrogation tortures that convicted them.

That Cheney and the PNAC crowd managed to convince anybody in our military or CIA that it had somehow been sanitized is pure criminality.

This country will never get its international reputation back until our own war criminals are brought to trial, convicted, and punished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. That is the correct political strategy
We are trying to reach people who never object to anything until they can imagine it being done to themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. NO no no no no no
NO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. Only when done among consenting adults
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. That new definition is, in and of itself, not legal.
US law has pretty specific definitions of torture, as does international law. Those can't be redefined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kazak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
10. Good question!
Rec'd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. the Roberts Alito Thomas Scalia Kennedy court might have to decide if the President can define it...
wanna hazard a guess as to how they'll rule?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-11-07 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. Clearly it is torture. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC