Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Citing AMT concerns, Blue Dogs revolt on procedural vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 11:47 AM
Original message
Citing AMT concerns, Blue Dogs revolt on procedural vote
Yep, there's nothing like party unity. Thank you, rahm.


Citing AMT concerns, Blue Dogs revolt on procedural vote
By Alexander Bolton | Posted: 12/18/07 10:35 AM
December 18, 2007


Nearly 30 conservative Blue Dog Democrats voted with Republicans Monday night to defeat an effort by Democratic leaders to pass a resolution that would have allowed Congress to adjourn for the year at the end of this week.

By preventing the House from adjourning, Blue Dogs have in effect taken hostage, at least temporarily, their colleagues’ hopes to be home for Christmas to possibly use as a bargaining chip in tax relief talks.

The surprise revolt sent jitters among Capitol staff who envisioned the less-than-merry prospect of staying in session past this week.

The conservative Democrats blocked their leadership’s attempt to prepare for adjournment after hearing rumors that the House would vote on the Senate’s version of an Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) relief bill later this week. Unlike two House-passed versions, the Senate-passed legislation would not offset the cost of tax relief with other tax increases, thus violating budget rules House Democrats adopted at the start of the year.

Earlier this month, 31 House Blue Dogs signed a letter to Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) insisting that AMT legislation comply with budget rules known as “pay as you go” or “PAYGO,” which require the cost of legislation be paid for. House and Senate Democratic leaders support paying for the AMT bill, but Senate Republicans refused to a relief measure with offsets.

A senior Democratic aide not aligned with the Blue Dogs argued that Monday’s action was intended to send a message to the Senate that it should a version of AMT relief paid for with corporate tax increases that passed the House recently. But Blue Dogs sent a clear message to House leaders as well: They may team up with Republicans to cause procedural havoc if their fiscal concerns are ignored.

more...

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/citing-amt-concerns-blue-dogs-revolt-on-procedural-vote-2007-12-18.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Jesus, how long before it becomes Pelosi's fault for not being a dictator
and "ordering" those Blue Dogs to obey her like a queen?

I say the Democrats should get ready to enjoy the joys of a DC Xmas--and turn the tables on those fuckers. Smile at the Staff, bring in Xmas cookies, put up a few more decorations. No crying. Just press on smartly.

Besides, Charlie Knows Best:

Rep. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.), chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, which has jurisdiction over taxes, said he did not think the Blue Dogs tactic would prove effective.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zabet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds like
someone needs to call
the Dogcatcher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. Its about time, dammit!
We have to get back to fiscally responsible legislation. The dems said they would, and now its time to walk the walk! If you can't pay for it, you can't have it.....period!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeStateDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. "AMT relief paid for with corporate tax increases," why not do this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC