Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

At Least one Healthcare Provider Org. is seeing the light!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NGinpa Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 09:07 PM
Original message
At Least one Healthcare Provider Org. is seeing the light!
Universal access to healthcare in this country has been hampered partly because provider organizations have been against if for many years. Now at least one Provider Org,
The American College of Physicians, is now singing a different tune for some reason. If universal access to care is going to ever come about, getting the buy in of providers for system reforms is important.

Universal healthcare in this country has gone down to defeat over the last 50 years with the help and blessing of the AMA.

The AMA and the Defeat of Government Insurance before 1960

By the 1960s, the system of private health insurance in the United States was well established. In 1958, nearly 75 percent of Americans had some form of private health insurance coverage. By helping to implement a successful system of voluntary health insurance plans, the medical profession had staved off the government intervention and nationalized insurance that it had feared since the 1910s. In addition to ensuring that private citizens had access to voluntary coverage, the AMA also was a vocal opponent of any nationalized health insurance programs, suggesting that such proposals were socialistic and would interfere with physician income and the doctor-patient relationship. The AMA had played a significant role in defeating proposals for nationalized health insurance in 1935 (under the Social Security Act) and later in defeating the proposed Murray-Wagner-Dingell (MWD) bill in 1949. The MWD bill would have provided comprehensive nationalized health insurance to all Americans. To ensure the defeat of the proposal, the AMA charged every physician who was a member $25 for their lobbying efforts (Marmor 2000).


But now:

Washington -- The American College of Physicians has endorsed the concept of a single-payer health care system for the first time.

In a new position paper, the organization, which represents 124,000 physicians in internal medicine and related subspecialties, identified a system in which the federal government is the sole third-party payer as one of two reform vehicles to achieve universal coverage. The other is a public-private system that includes a legal guarantee that everyone has access to coverage and that offers health care subsidies to low-income residents.



So we have a bit of competition between two provider groups. Hopefully The American College of Physicians will take the lead from now on. Other recommendations concerning reform made by the group are:

ACP reform plan
In a recent position paper, the American College of Physicians endorsed eight health reform recommendations, including two methods of achieving universal health care -- a single-payer system or a pluralistic system. Other recommendations include:

Providing basic health care benefits that aren't dependent on residence or employment status. The benefits should not have unreasonable financial barriers and should include preventive care; primary care, including chronic disease management; and protection from catastrophic expenses.
Controlling health care costs by offering patients better health information and incentives -- but not punishments -- to adopt healthy lifestyles.
Focusing federal work-force policy on ensuring an adequate supply of primary care doctors.
Redirecting federal health care policy to support the patient-centered medical home concept.
Creating a hybrid payment system that still covers services provided but also pays for care coordination and rewards physicians who meet evidence-based care standards.
Reducing administrative burdens by creating uniform billing and credentialing systems for all payers.
Supporting with federal funds an interoperable health information technology infrastructure.


I hope these new positions are not some sort of front or scam for short-term advantage, but are a sign of a real epiphany for this group and organized medicine in general about the mission of the American health care system and how to meet that mission. Come 2009 as the new leaders of this country come to grips with this healthcare problem, I do hope this group continues its enlightened stance, and maybe it can supplant the AMA as the provider lead org for the betterment of this country!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. i never really realized the connection
but the mcarthism and and socialist fear of the time is what helped shape our nations healthcare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Many physician's groups across the country have been endorsing
single payer for some time, good to see even more joining in the chorus :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Not enough, though
Our state's medical association just announced its support only of health care reform that requires people to buy private health insurance.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. .....
:banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC