Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BREAKING: Judge Orders Release of Pima County, AZ Voting Database

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 10:34 PM
Original message
BREAKING: Judge Orders Release of Pima County, AZ Voting Database


Diebold's GEMS Tabulator Files, Containing Data from '06 Election, Ordered Released to Democratic Party Experts for Scrutiny, Possible Release to Full Public Decision Seen as Important Victory for Election Integrity Advocates...

Guest Blogged by Michael Bryan, Esq.

Judge Michael Miller, in a carefully reasoned and balanced opinion, today ordered the release of the final Diebold GEMS tabulator database files from the contested 2006 Regional Transport Authority (RTA) election. The judge denied, without prejudice, full public access to every MDB and GBF database file for the 2006 elections in the possession of Pima County until and unless the plaintiffs can address remaining security concerns which might arise from that larger release.

The BRAD BLOG has been following this case closely because unsecured tabulation systems like GEMS are widely used in American elections and completely open to insider manipulation. For background and detailed commentary about the case see my 12/8/07 wrap-up post on the trial.

The immediate goal of the Democratic party --- to be able to look closer at the final election databases for the 2006 election --- is fully satisfied by the ruling. But the broader goal of being able to look at a time series of backups for discrepancies or discontinuities that could indicate manipulation, as Arizona Election Integrity advocates have feared, is stymied for the moment...


It is still unclear whether the judge will grant on-going injunctive relief to turn over the final database files from every election going forward. The denial of access to the entire series of database files indicates that the court may still need to be satisfied as to any remaining concerns about security resulting from on-going and multiple disclosures of this type of data before granting such an injunction.




http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5457
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great news! Thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Great news...but anyone want to bet that the data will get lost,
erased or destroyed before it can be provided?

Diebold who makes ATMS used windows platforms for their voting machines so they could be modifed.

This should be interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I wouldn't be surprised if it isn't already "lost".
"It was rat chere behind the file cabinet all along, Andy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Given that the incompetents at Diebold used MS Access
I think it could have genuinely been lost without malicious intent. I wouldn't use Access to record the number of times I make a bowel movement every day, let alone use it to store voting records.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. Makes my heart go "boom, boom, boom":
"...the release of the final Diebold GEMS tabulator database files..."

It's a tiny election somewhere only a small crowd of people really care about, but it grants legal status to claims upon how e-voting companies migrate their voting machine data to their super-reliable machine that figures out the totals.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC