|
It was about a year ago when I posted precisely how disgusted this phrase made me, and why. "Fight them over there?"
The initial reasoning for going to war in Iraq was, ostensibly, that they had WMDs. They didn't. Then it was to topple Saddam, a tyrant, to be sure, but no worse than many. And questionably certainly no worse in some respect to the extremist-influenced puppet government in place there now. Don't think so? Ask any Iraqi woman--particularly those who had a career under Saddam and are now relegated back to second-class citizens.
"Fight them over there?"
Well, sure, it's not OUR fucking backyard. It's not our schools, homes, and shops being blown up, now is it? It's not OUR children who are lucky to make it to school, and not us who are scared that something may happen while they're there.
"So we don't have to fight them over here."
Yeah, right. So hundreds of thousands of innocent people die in OUR war, conducted on THEIR streets, all so we don't have to worry about it happening on our turf? Setting aside the fact that we don't know if the war there is in any way keeping them from eventually coming here, it's still a morally bankrupt position.
There's a point where the very notion of collatoral damage morphs into something else. Hundreds of thousands of people killed in OUR War? Not their war, since they never asked for it, but OUR war. To allegedly keep US safe.
Sure as hell didn't keep THEM safe, now did it?
We can arrest them, torture them, disappear them, and ignore the incidental deaths because, as our leaders tell us, it's "all in a good cause." We're spreading Democracy, damn it. Oh, sure, it's crappy, corrupt, corporate-controlled, religious-fanatic influenced democracy, but it's better than a dictatorship.
Isn't it?
Ask the parents who've lost children, the children who've lost parents, and the women who've lost their freedom. Ask them.
Just don't be surprised if you don't like the answer.
|