Help end the senseless slaughter

I just donated some money to these good folks. If you would like to also do the same:

The National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty...

http://www.ncadp.org/

Upper right hand corner -- "Donate Now!"

========================================

10 reasons to abolish the death penalty

By 2004, 118 countries had abolished the death penalty, in law or practice. An average of three countries abolish the death penalty every year. The worldwide trend towards abolition of the death penalty is reflected in the Africa region, where 24 members of the African Union had abolished the death penalty, in law or practice, by 1 October 2004.(1) Here are ten reasons for the total abolition of this degrading and inhuman punishment:

1 - the death penalty violates the right to life.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) recognises each person’s right to life. Article 4 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples´ Rights (ACHPR) states that "human beings are inviolable. Every human being shall be entitled to respect for his life and the physical and moral integrity of his person." This view is reinforced by the existence of international and regional treaties providing for the abolition of the death penalty, notably the second optional protocol of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations in 1989.

2 - the death penalty is a cruel and inhuman death.

The UDHR categorically states that "No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment."All forms of execution are inhuman. No government can guarantee a dignified and painless death to condemned prisoners, who also suffer psychological pain in the period between their sentence and execution.

3 - the death penalty has no dissuasive effect.

No scientific study has proved that the death penalty has a more dissuasive effect on crime than other punishments. The most recent investigation into the links of cause and effect between capital punishment and the murder rate, was conducted by the United Nations in 1988 and updated in 2002. It came to the following conclusion: "...it is not prudent to accept the hypothesis that capital punishment deters murder to a marginally greater extent than does the threat and application of the supposedly lesser punishment of life imprisonment."

4 - the death penalty is premeditated murder, demeans the state and makes society more violent.

By executing a person, the state commits a murder and shows the same readiness to use physical violence against its victim as the criminal. Moreover, studies have shown that the murder rate increases immediately after executions. Researchers have suggested that this increase is similar to that caused by other violent public events, such as massacres and assassinations.

5 - the death penalty is discriminatory in its application.

Throughout the world, the death penalty is disproportionately used against disadvantaged people. Some condemned prisoners from the most impoverished social classes would not have been sentenced to death if they were from wealthier sectors of society. In these cases, either the accused are less able to find their way through the maze of the judicial system (because of a lack of knowledge, confidence or financial means), or the system reflects the generally negative attitude of society and the powerful towards them. It has also been proved that certain criminals run a greater risk of being condemned to death if their victims come from higher social classes.

6 - the death penalty denies the capacity of people to mend their ways and become a better person.

Defenders of the death penalty consider that anyone sentenced to death is unable to mend their ways and could re-offend at any time if they are released. However, there are many examples of offenders who have been reintegrated and who have not re-offended. Amnesty International believes that the way to prevent re-offending is to review procedures for conditional release and the psychological monitoring of prisoners during detention, and under no circumstances to increase the number of executions. In addition, the death penalty removes any possibility for the condemned person to repent.

7 - the death penalty cannot provide social stability nor bring peace to the victims.

An execution cannot give the victim his or her life back nor ease the suffering felt by their family. Far from reducing the pain, the length of the trial and the appeal procedure often prolong the family’s suffering.

8 - the death penalty denies the fallibility of human institutions.

The risk of executing innocent people remains indissolubly linked to the use of the death penalty. Since 1973, 116 people condemned to death in the United States have been released after proof of their innocence has been established. Some of them have only just escaped execution, after having passed years on death row. These repeated judicial errors have been especially due to irregularities committed by prosecution or police officers, recourse to doubtful evidence, material information or confessions, or the incompetence of defence lawyers. Other prisoners have been sent to their deaths when serious doubts existed about their guilt.

9 - the death penalty is a collective punishment.

This punishment affects all the family, friends and those sympathising with the condemned person. The close relatives of an executed prisoner, who generally do not have anything to do with the crime, could feel, as a result of the death penalty, the same dreadful sense of loss as the victim’s parents felt at the death of their loved one.

10 - the death penalty goes against the religious and humanist values that are common to all humanity.

Human rights are universal, indivisible and interdependent. They are based on many traditions that can be found in all civilisations. All religions advocate clemency, compassion and forgiveness and it is on these values that Amnesty International bases its opposition to the death penalty.

http://www.amnesty.org/en/alfresco_asset/d18adc00-a37d-11dc-9d08-f145a8145d2b/afr010132004en.html

I thought this was a Tiger thing.....

The death penalty deters crime. Look at the Dark Ages--you could be put to death for minor offenses and as a result no one ever committed a crime punishable by death. In countries where there is no death penalty for crimes such as murder, the number of homicides is astronomical! I mean look at Norway--they have no death penalty and the homicide rate there is 0.78 per 100,000 persons!

Now it's been a while since I was in high school math, but I think you're supposed to divide to find the number of people that is. So for Norway, 100,000 divided by .78 is 128,205! That means that they have more homicides than people--they're so bloodthirsty that they're killing people who don't even exist at a rate of 28,205 per 100,000 people! They're killing 28% more people than they have. For a population of 4,770,000, that's 1,335,600 people.

I suspect that I either did my math wrong, which I couldn't have--numbers don't lie, or there's some sort of cloning project where once the entire population is killed, they activate the 1.3 million clones, kill them, and then wait until spring when the new population springs up from the ground, fully grown. In the US, it's only 5.9 per 100,000. 100,000 divided by 5.9 is 16,949. If we abolish the death penalty in this country, we could end up like Norway, only since our population of about 300 million is about 64 times larger than Norway's, we'd have 84 million more murders than people. Since we don't have a cloning project or a population that springs up from the ground every year, I don't see how that can be sustained.

Conclusive proof that countries with the death penalty have lower homicide rates. It's the only way to avoid having 84 million more murders than people in this country.

on edit: I fully support abolishing the death penalty, k&r.