Taylor Marsh the Clinton DLC operative having daily MELTDOWN

She is so predictable.
I won't link to her site to give her traffic, but todays claim is that Obama is slamming Gore, something she derived from a Daily News article. Of course Obama NEVER mentions Gore, but talks about the 2000, and 2004 electorate.
The DLC'ers are melting down about the latest polls. Expect more nonsense today.
They don't want Obama to even place, it shows who they are really frightened of, in this race.

she also is involved in the obama/edwards hit site "hillary is 44". if one reads the trash that who ever writes for "hillary is 44" they are not above using race and racial code words to attack obama.

writes. Her agenda is transparent and she doesn't seem too ethical to me, more like desperate.

http://www.taylormarsh.com/

I'd never heard of this woman before today. But she's a Democrat, and this IS Democratic Underground, after all.

The Gore (and don't forget KERRY in there, either) article is second in the queue, and was put up YESTERDAY, FWIW....

The top article as of this moment of this posting discusses Obama's seven point lead.

It's pretty pointless to gripe about someone or something on these internets without directing people to what you are griping about. It makes it appear as though you have a particular and not entirely forthright agenda. And that is all well and good, but it's best to be even-handed about these sorts of things. It's a credibility enhancer, certainly.

Taylor Marsh is a DLC Clinton operative, and uses Rovian tactics, so believe her if you want.
Anyonw who is a Rove clone is NOT a democrat, they are an ABOMINATION!

This isn't "LEFT WING" Democratic Underground, it's Democratic Underground. The Democratic Party actually IS a big tent, see?

Well, you don't see, I'm guessing, because you are an ideologue who doesn't apparently subscribe to the "Big Tent" philosophy that the party platform exhorts.

I gotta say, though, you're killing me with that "abomination" nonsense--that's a great 'fundy' word to use to exhort your particular party-wing views!! You probably aren't seeing the irony, but it's plain as day to me...

And you may say it is "well known" repeatedly, but I had never heard of the woman before you griped about her without a cite.

I don't "believe" her, or disbelieve her, see?

I don't KNOW her.

So much for "well known" then, eh?

I never said DU was left wing only.
So NO SALE HERE.
I DO know her, so I can have my opinion, and you can have yours...SEE!...that is really what big tent means.
As for your fundie slam.....take that elsewhere like free republic, I am a progressive.

You're essentially calling me one of those fucks with that halfassed comment.

And you ARE, also, by saying that, suggesting that the DLC isn't part of the party. Sorry, it is.

You might benefit from a reread of the rules.

My fundy comment wasn't a slam--it was a fact. Those fundies DO love that "abomination" word, and it was, certainly, ironic, that you used it from a far-left perpespective to insult those members of the Democratic Party who aren't like you.

The fact that you are using phrases like
"seig heil"
"fundie"
ARE SLAMS
I never said the DLC wasn't part of the party, I called it a BAD part of the party. My opinion, you can have yours.
You are all in a teitter about my comments, but by calling me a fundie, you did what you accuse me of doing.
I responded in kind.
As i said befor I am not responding to you again and I will put you on ignore!!!

HAPPY NEW YEAR!

My response was not to YOU, see--it was to Methuen Progressive, who cleverly made a Hitler joke.

Abomination is a fundie word, like it or not. You apparently don't like that fact, but a fact it remains. Too bad for you!

What is a "teitter?" Sounds a bit German, that.

I never called you a fundie. You need to learn to read for comprehension. And maybe to get over yourself a bit, too, while you're at it.

Context is everything. You seem to have trouble with it.

That 'ignore' idea of yours IS a good one. I find Skimmers-Not-Readers a bit of an effort these days in the run-up to the elections. Do remember though, that if you SAY you are going to do it, you have to do it--that's in those DU rules.

Looking forward to never hearing from you again, then! Cheerio!

chug a lug it to get their ears and eyes open.

Why do you think the "Elites, some from both parties" have begun
to show their hand? This whole Bloomberg tease about running.
reflects the fear reverberating throughout the world of American
Elites. The fact that Obama and Edwards are doing well in Iowa
has thrown them into a panic. When people panic they can do stupid
things or act wisely. Our Elites have,so far. not scored too many
points that could be characterized as wise. Threatening to run
Bloomberg is not even Democratic much less wise. Third Party
Candidates need to have a base from the grassroots who get out
and work to get their candidate on the ballot. Having Elites
push a candidate after an election is already enjoined is
questionable.

It just is not the Clinton Campaign, Foks. The timing of the
WaPO story on Bloomberg and the hoopla around a Bloomberg Run.
is just as suspect. At least to rank and file Democrats.

DUers please remember this. There are Dems and Repubs becoming
Independents. As the elections officials in the states will tell
anyone willing to listen. These people are strong Democratic
Independents or Strong Republican Independents. They did not
become Independents seeking some mushy middle. They are disgusted
with the Democratic Party for not standing up to the Republicans.
Independent Republicans are disgusted with their party for being
so far right and never compromising. There is no pool of people
sitting in the "middle" lacking convictions for anything.
There are people fed up with this Center Right Governance.

It is more than Clinton Campaigner meltdwon.

More of her like, wicked nasty hate and stuff:



What a witch...

As long as THEIR DLC candidates win....Marsh is one of them!
NO SALE HERE!

:rofl:

I had no clue who she was to this very day...! She's not as well known as some might think, I guess!

You obviously just want to slam others who have a diff. opinion!
Last response to you

Happy New Year!

How many times are you going to contnue to use that "slam" word out of context?

I just took a poll of the three others in the room, also very politically active--they've never heard of her either. Two thought that Taylor was a man's name.

She's not the "Big Cheese" you're making her out to be. She's a small fry who barely makes a blip on the big stage.