Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bhutto Didn't Trust Bush With Sensitive Evidence of Rigging Pakistan Elections

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 10:20 AM
Original message
Bhutto Didn't Trust Bush With Sensitive Evidence of Rigging Pakistan Elections
http://alternet.org/blogs/peek/72176/#more

Bhutto Didn't Trust Bush With Sensitive Evidence of Rigging Pakistan Elections

Posted by GottaLaff , Cliff Schecter's Blog at 6:56 AM on January 1, 2008.

Can't say I blame her.


How interesting that Benazir Bhutto felt the way a lot of us do, and about the very same thing...rigging elections:

The day she was assassinated last Thursday, Benazir Bhutto had planned to reveal new evidence alleging the involvement of Pakistan's intelligence agencies in rigging the country's upcoming elections, an aide said Monday.

Bhutto had been due to meet U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., and Rep. Patrick Kennedy, D-R.I., to hand over a report charging that the military Inter-Services Intelligence agency was planning to fix the polls in the favor of President Pervez Musharraf.

Safraz Khan Lashari, a member of the Pakistan People's Party election monitoring unit, said the report was "very sensitive" and that the party wanted to initially share it with trusted American politicians rather than the Bush administration, which is seen here as strongly backing Musharraf.


Can't say as I blame them.

{Safraz Khan Lashari, a member of the Pakistan People's Party election monitoring unit}, said the report claimed that U.S. aid money was being used to fix the elections. Ballots stamped in favor of the Pakistan Muslim League-Q, which supports Musharraf, were to be produced by the intelligence agencies in about 100 parliamentary constituencies.

So now BushCo money is being used to expand election fraud to other countries. Let's hope if it happens here again, SuperObama, or SuperHill, or SuperJohn, will whoop 'em once and for all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. I fear we are heading toward our third stolen presidential election.
The talking heads will justify the theft by saying "America wasn't ready for a woman," "American wasn't ready for an African American," or not willing to trust a populist trial lawyer. And business will go as usual in a nation which hasn't had a presidential election decided by the people in twelve years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. We can't let them do it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red Zelda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. And the treasonous media
are fully complicit in this tragedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. That's Bush's brand of democracy alright...
When will Congress weigh in???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. Didn't want the BFEE to get any new Ideas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
6. I just read this article on the front page, above the fold, of my local paper.
All I can say is WOW. I hope the rest of the media picks up this story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. How many nations rely on US technology, Diebold, et.al., for fair elections?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC