Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reallocated Numbers Based on Second Preferences Gives EDWARDS A Solid Lead

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
AmBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 09:48 PM
Original message
Reallocated Numbers Based on Second Preferences Gives EDWARDS A Solid Lead
Reallocated Numbers Based on Second Preferences Gives Edwards A Solid Lead

InsiderAdvantage/Majority Opinion Poll: Clinton and Edwards in Virtual Tie in Iowa
Compiled from InsiderAdvantage and Southern Political Report staff reports


December 31, 2007 — Using the same polling methodology that successfully predicted the outcome of the 2004 Democratic Caucus in Iowa, InsiderAdvantage/Majority Opinion Research has been conducting a daily tracking poll among likely voters in the Jan. 3 Iowa Democratic Caucus, and it shows a statistical tie between Hillary Clinton and John Edwards, with Barack Obama starting to lag.

Clinton has 30%, Edwards 29%, Obama 22%, with 14% committed to other candidates and 5% undecided.
The survey was conducted Dec. 28-29 among 788 likely Democratic voters in Iowa. The poll has been weighted for gender and age. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.4%.

Critically, Edwards was the second choice of 62% of those who supported other candidates that did not receive the required 15% of the vote. Clinton was the second choice of 21% and Obama of 17%.

Using the reallocation methodology InsiderAdvantage used in 2004 – which correctly indicated a fairly comfortable win for John Kerry – our new poll reveals that, if the caucuses were held today, the reallocated final outcome would be:

Edwards: 41%
Clinton: 34%
Obama: 25%


“We removed from the results the percentages allocated for ‘other candidates’ and ‘undecideds,’ and then reallocated the support of those who are supporting candidates without the required 15% level of support,” said Jeff Shusterman of InsiderAdvantage’s research partner, Majority Opinion Research.

“We then merged these totals with the percentages of support the top candidates received on the first ‘ballot.’ This is the same methodology we used in 2004,” he said.
InsiderAdvantage CEO/Creators Syndicate’s Matt Towery offered this analysis:

“What many who look at the Iowa Democratic Caucus may miss is that its delegates are apportioned much like the old “county unit system” once used in Southern states. This gives rural areas, where Edwards is running strong, the opportunity to have a disproportionately significant impact on the ultimate outcome.
“Regardless of geographic areas of support, the Edwards ‘second choice’ percentage has remained well over 50% since we first released a second-choice survey in early December,” he said. As a follow-up to that earlier survey, InsiderAdvantage has polled the race every night since Dec. 26.

“The overall trend lines have changed very little over the last several days,” Towery said. “Generally, every night shows Clinton with a slight lead, Obama losing steam, and Edwards hanging in close to Clinton. Moreover, the trends show that Edwards consistently is the second choice of those whose first choice candidate is below 15%.
“Probably the race will tighten. I would expect that the reallocated numbers will tighten among the top candidates as well.

“The most that can be said now is that Clinton likely will appear to be the leader in many caucus locations on the first round, but not by a big margin. If Edwards’ second preference position holds, he may very well be the upset winner on Jan. 3.

“As for the Republicans, I’m not comfortable releasing numbers yet. I’ve seen enough GOP polls in 28 years to know when some sort of shift is taking place.

“The Republican numbers right now are all over the place and, in my experience, that means the numbers probably won’t settle until immediately prior to the voting,” Towery said.

http://www.southernpoliticalreport.com/storylink_1231_103.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. The article is two days old
Which may not be significant, but I'd be happier if the most up-to-date numbers and analysis also showed a big Edwards win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. These numbers have remained fairly consistent...
...all month, unlike the Republicans numbers that are all over the place. The DM Register Poll was done with bogus methodology and the media is putting way too much emphasis on it. But of course the corporate MSM doesn't want Edwards to win this so that makes perfect sense. These guys predicted Kerry's unexpected win with this same polling method. I think they're spot on now. And that's one hefty margin for Edwards that they are showing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. The margin certainly is hefty
Maybe tomorrow evening will be a happy time in our home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandyd921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is what a lot of people are not taking into account:
1. the second choices

2. the rural caucus advantage

Interesting article!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yes ma'am.....
Edited on Wed Jan-02-08 10:19 PM by AmBlue
You're right. A lot of folks don't understand how caucusing works. These guys can see our Edwards win coming down the tracks!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC