Bill O'Reilly on Oprah " his crusade against pedophiles "

Just heard that "BillO" will be on Oprah to promote his crusade to keep pedophiles in jail. I wonder if she knows what he said about that boy being held captive a few weeks ago. He is such a hypocrite. I am going to write and protest his being portrayed as a good guy on this subject. He has shown contempt for the victim by saying that that child wanted to be there or he would have left.

:hide:

They are as deranged and deviant as the Felafelphiles !

And both perverions are exclusively republicon !!!

Only a really sick republicon type would get his perverted sexual jollies
with felafel, wouldn't you agree, Mr. Chickenhawk O'Reilly?

...is because he views them as COMPETITION.

He's a PROVEN sexual harasser, he shows the world nightly
that he's got some very twisted power/control issues, and
his statements on that kidnapping case sounded like he was
paraphrasing an official press release from NAMBLA.

The guy just SCREAMS 'molestor' to me, on many levels.

I told my husband that he gave me the creeps long before his phone message incident. There has always been that strange look in his eyes an spit seems to gather in the corners of his lips when he talked about anything sexual.

... attempting to tread water. I guessing that his demographic is diminishing because of "attritition" (ie, going to their great reward) and, more importanly, growing weary of his tired routine.

:evilgrin:

And, from everything I've read, commiserated with him, as she herself was the victim of lon-term sexual abuse by relatives. I don't know why she's having him of her show, but I hope she calls him on this. Oprah has been very vocal about rights and protection for child abuse victims.

How long do you give it until O'Really is found out like Mark Foley?

He's the one that said that Shawn Hornbeck stayed with his captor because he "enjoyed it."

BillO said the kid was "tortured" into co-operating, did not just stay because he wanted to.

Because he ACTUALLY said this on his show on Jan 15th. 2007:

All right, you know, the Stockholm syndrome thing,
I don't buy it. I've never bought it. I didn't think
it happened in the Patty Hearst case. I don't think it
happened here.

<...>

O'REILLY: I'm not buying this. If you're 11 years old or
12 years old, 13, and you have a strong bond with your family,
OK, even if the guy threatens you, this and that, you're riding
your bike around, you got friends. The kid didn't go to school.
There's all kinds of stuff. If you can get away, you get away.
All right? If you're 11.

<...>

O'REILLY: This is what I believe happened in the Hearst case
and in this case. The situation that Hearst found herself in
was exciting. She had a boring life. She was a child of privilege.
All of a sudden, she's in with a bunch of charismatic thugs,
and she enjoyed it. The situation here for this kid looks to me
to be a lot more fun than what he had under his old parents.
He didn't have to go to school. He could run around and do whatever he wanted.

Shithead, but he said just yesterday when I listened to him during my commute that the boys were tortured into staying. I don't know (and doubt) that there has ever been a mea culpa for his statements in January, but he is not saying that anymore.

I hate billyboy, but I do agree with much of what he has to say about pedophiles.

I don't listen to him often, but I didn't have my mp3 with me in the car and I hate music radio.

I heard it played many times and he was not in any way standing up for the child.

Try reading them.

On the January 15 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor, host Bill O'Reilly said of Shawn Hornbeck -- who was abducted at the age of 11, held for four years, and recently found in Missouri -- that "there was an element here that this kid liked about this circumstances" and that he "do(esn't) buy" "the Stockholm syndrome thing." O'Reilly also said: "The situation here for this kid looks to me to be a lot more fun than what he had under his old parents. He didn't have to go to school. He could run around and do whatever he wanted." When fellow Fox News host Greta Van Susteren pointed out that "some kids like school," O'Reilly replied: "Well, I don't believe this kid did."

http://mediamatters.org/items/200701170009

But don't take MY word for it, click on the link and you can watch the actual video of Bill's atrocious remarks.

what you claim in your post.

I guess Mr. O'Loofah is just gonna pretend his statements
of a month ago never happened...

his statements in January reveal exactly the type of person that he is and his actions toward his former assistant should be enough for anyone never to listen to anything he has to say on sexual predators.

He spouted off non-sense and now regrets it.

wanted to stay because they had more fun than their true home life should earn that filthy pig a one-way ticket to hell.

And it's despicable that you seem to be defending him. :puke:

So I went to her website to write her a letter and it says that she's also going to have on a man who is explaining why he didn't run when it happened to him as a young teenager. So that's good.

I'm still writing her. I don't know when the show was taped, but I'd still like her to hear my opinion on the subject.

I can't stand it when legitimate shows give people like him a platform to spread their lies and hate.

for missing children recently cancelled his appearance because of the remarks he made about this boy.

How could she even CONSIDER inviting Bill back under these circumstances? If he wants to atone for what he said, he has a TV and radio show at his disposal--oh, wait, their ratings are dropping. Anyway, what an insult!

rocknation
:wow:

how the hell is he going to be able to do that?

People are posting some good stuff there!

Yeah, he's the one to lead the crusade! :sarcasm:

LOL

but O'Reilly has changed his tune on the Hornbeck case.

From his article about his appearance on Oprah


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,253367,00.html

I have no idea if he apologized for his original comments (doubt it).

He's a grown man who has been in the news business his entire life. Nobody that old needs to be educated on the trauma caused by abuse. He said what he said because he's an idiot. Changing his tune now is because of the reaction, not because he was suddenly educated to something that wasn't commonly known before. The man really ought to be fired. There was a time when he would have been, he and Limbaugh both.

People have said that O'Asshole has never said that about torture. That isn't true. I just gave the link so that the discussion of how much of an asshole billyboy is, is an accurate one.

Again, I'm not a Bill O'Reilly supporter.

Going up against the powerful pro-pedophile lobby!