Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What does anyone know about HR676? There was a full page ad in the USA Today

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 08:53 AM
Original message
What does anyone know about HR676? There was a full page ad in the USA Today
paid for by the National Nurses Organizing Committee. Supposedly it: "provides complete medical, dental, vision and long term care; eliminates deductibles, co-pays, and hidden fees; allows you to choose your doctor, lab, hospital, healthcare facility; is completely portable and not tied to employment; is free from interference or second guessing by insurance companies."
They call it CheneyCare becuase they say every American should be entitled to the same care as our veep.
More at www.cheneycare.org
or call 1-800-440-6877
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. I know it is an awesome bill
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 09:01 AM by harun
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_National_Health_Insurance_Act

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:HR676:

Current co-sponsors (if your rep isn't on the list write them, I did):

Rep Abercrombie, Neil - 1/24/2007
Rep Baca, Joe - 9/17/2007
Rep Baldwin, Tammy - 1/24/2007
Rep Becerra, Xavier - 6/13/2007
Rep Berman, Howard L. - 6/15/2007
Rep Bishop, Sanford D., Jr. - 12/11/2007
Rep Brady, Robert A. - 2/27/2007
Rep Brown, Corrine - 4/17/2007
Rep Capuano, Michael E. - 11/9/2007
Rep Carson, Julia - 1/24/2007
Rep Christensen, Donna M. - 1/24/2007
Rep Clarke, Yvette D. - 2/16/2007
Rep Clay, Wm. Lacy - 1/24/2007
Rep Cohen, Steve - 2/7/2007
Rep Cummings, Elijah E. - 1/24/2007
Rep Davis, Danny K. - 1/24/2007
Rep Delahunt, William D. - 2/12/2007
Rep Doyle, Michael F. - 3/21/2007
Rep Ellison, Keith - 1/24/2007
Rep Engel, Eliot L. - 1/24/2007
Rep Farr, Sam - 1/24/2007
Rep Fattah, Chaka - 1/24/2007
Rep Filner, Bob - 1/24/2007
Rep Frank, Barney - 3/7/2007
Rep Green, Al - 1/24/2007
Rep Grijalva, Raul M. - 1/24/2007
Rep Gutierrez, Luis V. - 1/24/2007
Rep Hare, Phil - 4/30/2007
Rep Hastings, Alcee L. - 1/29/2007
Rep Hinchey, Maurice D. - 1/24/2007
Rep Hirono, Mazie K. - 7/23/2007
Rep Honda, Michael M. - 1/24/2007
Rep Jackson, Jesse L., Jr. - 1/24/2007
Rep Jackson-Lee, Sheila - 1/24/2007
Rep Jefferson, William J. - 6/26/2007
Rep Johnson, Eddie Bernice - 1/24/2007
Rep Johnson, Henry C. "Hank," Jr. - 2/13/2007
Rep Jones, Stephanie Tubbs - 5/23/2007
Rep Kaptur, Marcy - 2/12/2007
Rep Kennedy, Patrick J. - 9/24/2007
Rep Kildee, Dale E. - 4/17/2007
Rep Kilpatrick, Carolyn C. - 1/24/2007
Rep Kucinich, Dennis J. - 1/24/2007
Rep Lantos, Tom - 10/1/2007
Rep Lee, Barbara - 1/24/2007
Rep Lewis, John - 1/24/2007
Rep Loebsack, David - 1/24/2007
Rep Lynch, Stephen F. - 10/9/2007
Rep Maloney, Carolyn B. - 1/29/2007
Rep McDermott, Jim - 1/24/2007
Rep McGovern, James P. - 1/24/2007
Rep McNulty, Michael R. - 1/24/2007
Rep Meehan, Martin T. - 1/24/2007
Rep Meeks, Gregory W. - 9/20/2007
Rep Miller, George - 1/24/2007
Rep Moore, Gwen - 1/24/2007
Rep Nadler, Jerrold - 1/29/2007
Rep Napolitano, Grace F. - 2/27/2007
Rep Norton, Eleanor Holmes - 3/21/2007
Rep Olver, John W. - 2/16/2007
Rep Pastor, Ed - 1/24/2007
Rep Payne, Donald M. - 1/24/2007
Rep Rangel, Charles B. - 1/24/2007
Rep Richardson, Laura - 9/20/2007
Rep Roybal-Allard, Lucille - 1/24/2007
Rep Rush, Bobby L. - 2/6/2007
Rep Ryan, Tim - 5/8/2007
Rep Sanchez, Linda T. - 4/23/2007
Rep Sanchez, Loretta - 9/20/2007
Rep Schakowsky, Janice D. - 4/17/2007
Rep Scott, David - 9/20/2007
Rep Scott, Robert C. "Bobby" - 1/24/2007
Rep Serrano, Jose E. - 2/7/2007
Rep Solis, Hilda L. - 2/12/2007
Rep Sutton, Betty - 3/27/2007
Rep Thompson, Bennie G. - 6/12/2007
Rep Tierney, John F. - 9/6/2007
Rep Towns, Edolphus - 1/24/2007
Rep Udall, Tom - 2/27/2007
Rep Waters, Maxine - 1/29/2007
Rep Watson, Diane E. - 1/24/2007
Rep Weiner, Anthony D. - 1/24/2007
Rep Welch, Peter - 5/3/2007
Rep Wexler, Robert - 1/24/2007
Rep Woolsey, Lynn C. - 1/24/2007
Rep Wynn, Albert Russell - 1/24/2007
Rep Yarmuth, John A. - 2/27/2007
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. I am so so glad these nurses are bringing Health care to the forefront! Enough of
emotions and hair cuts and other crap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I wrote to my Rep about this bill and explained how my wife
works at a hospital and I work in the health care industry and we both think this is the way to go, even if it brings economic hardship on us. It is doing what is right over what is profitable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. Every doctor in the country should be supporting this bill.
But they wont. The doctors in the US are making way too much money off this system to want to change it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I work for workers Donating Member (551 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. It still doesn't cover laser eye surgery, and expressly goes out of its way to deny
vision corrective surgery as "cosmetic". I don't get this at all. Pretending glasses aren't outdated and borderline barbaric is like giving someone a crutch because they broke their Achilles tendon. Better options exist, and they should be covered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I have private health insurance now
and it doesn't cover laser eye surgery. Why would you expect a national healthcare plan to cover them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I work for workers Donating Member (551 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Because fixed vision trumps lenses strapped to your head in my book.
I've always thought that the insurance industries refusal to cover laser corrective surgery was BS. I'm just shocked and saddened to see HR676 pull the same dirty trick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. The thing that has to be realized...and it will be painful for some
that there is only a finite amount of dollars for healthcare.
Right now, I pay a small fortune for my insurance and theoretically, it SHOULD cover anything I want.
However, in a system that is designed for ALL--I can surely see that any "vanity" procedures would not be covered.
I would rather, as a whole, make sure every man, woman, and child had the insurance they needed to cover their healthcare, even at the expense of any vanity surgery that I might want to have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. I have eye car insurance and mine only covers laser vision
correction for a 15 percent discount of 5 percent off any promotional price for laser vision correction surgery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. I can't stand the name of it, but otherwise it sounds good. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warren pease Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Exactly. It's time for a little marketing...
Instead of calling it single-payer, universal-access health care -- which most people don't have a clue about -- why not go the shameless route and try to get something passed on raw emotion for a change? Nothing else seems to work.

Cigna has handed us the opportunity to go the same route with single-payer, or HR 676, or whatever the hell it's called.

So let's call it "Nataline's Law" after the kid they killed by denial-of-coverage a couple of weeks ago. Then, not only does single-payer have a face, but every time some apologist for the current for-profit disaster tries to insult the alternative, they're stuck invoking her name yet again.

I fail to see how this could be any less effective than what we're doing now.

We have things like "Amber alerts" and "Megan's Law" and "The Ryan White CARE Act" because people respond more readily to emotional issues than to the straight story. Suppose Amber Alerts were known as "kidnapped kid phone trees." Think they'd get the attention they get now?


wp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. It's the way to go: single payer universal health care
Representative Conyers' page on it:http://www.house.gov/conyers/news_hr676.htm

PNHP info on it:http://www.pnhp.org/publications/the_national_health_insurance_bill_hr_676.php

What we need is enough Democrats in Congress to enact it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC