The EXIT POLLS were right. There was no "fraud."

What do the people making allegations of fraud, Diebold etc. think about the fact that the exit polls were correct?

:eyes:

seems like areas that were counted by diebold machines went for clinton and Mccain in higher percentages then areas taht were hand counted.

http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/1954/71200.htm...

UPDATE JAN 9 9am PST: TOWN OF SUTTON CONFIRMS RON PAUL TOTALS WERE 31, NOT ZERO.

I just got off the phone with Jennifer Call, Town Clerk for Sutton. She confirmed that the Ron Paul totals in Sutton were actually 31, and said that they were "left off the tally sheet" and it was human error.

This is not an acceptable answer, especially because one of the most common forms of fraud in a hand count system is to alter or omit results on the reporting sheet. Hand count is lovely, transparent. They then fill out another reconciliation sheet, often in front of witnesses, and it looks fine. Then they provide a summary or media sheet with the incorrect results.

Those polls?

participation of, and absolute silence of, half the population, in order for the plan to work. But then most conspiricists are also paranoid and that pretty much explains most of their logical fallacies.

wouldn't such a conspiracy know the places they need to place people to pull off their plans. and make sure to get their people placed there.

with these ridiculous comments.
I am no Hillary fan but truth still matters to me.

But that was then...